Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2
@ 2018-08-24 23:08 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-08-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan @ 2018-08-24 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan, Rodrigo Vivi

CI runs show PSR2 does not go to IDLE with selective update enabled on
all PSR exit triggers. Specifically, logs indicate the hardware enters
"SLEEP Selective Update" and not "IDLE Reset state', like the kernel
expects, when vblank interrupts are enabled. This check was added for PSR1
but incorrectly extended to PSR2, remove the check as it breaks tests
and prints out misleading error messages.

v2: Split out non-code changes (Rodrigo)

Cc: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fixes: c43dbcbbcc8c ("drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle")
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index da583a45e942..2cb931f3019b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -771,8 +771,6 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
 {
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc_state->base.crtc);
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
-	i915_reg_t reg;
-	u32 mask;
 
 	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled || !new_crtc_state->has_psr)
 		return 0;
@@ -787,13 +785,10 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
 	 * not needed and will induce latencies in the atomic
 	 * update path.
 	 */
-	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
-		reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS;
-		mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
-	} else {
-		reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS;
-		mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
-	}
+
+	/* FIXME: Update this for PSR2 if we need to wait for idle */
+	if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled))
+		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Max time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate +
@@ -801,7 +796,8 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
 	 * handshake. 50 msec is defesive enough to cover everything.
 	 */
 
-	return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask,
+	return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_STATUS,
+					 EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
 					 EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_IDLE, 2, 50,
 					 out_value);
 }
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle()
  2018-08-24 23:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
@ 2018-08-24 23:08 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-08-24 23:19   ` Rodrigo Vivi
  2018-08-24 23:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Rodrigo Vivi
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan @ 2018-08-24 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan, Rodrigo Vivi

Added bspec reference, aligned text and documented the function.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 2cb931f3019b..aee64aee18fe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -766,6 +766,16 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
 }
 
+/**
+ * intel_psr_wait_for_idle - wait for PSR1 to idle
+ * @new_crtc_state: new CRTC state
+ * @out_value: PSR status in case of failure
+ *
+ * This function is expected to be called from pipe_update_start() where it is
+ * not expected to race with PSR enable or disable.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success or -ETIMEOUT if PSR status does not idle.
+ */
 int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
 			    u32 *out_value)
 {
@@ -775,25 +785,15 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
 	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled || !new_crtc_state->has_psr)
 		return 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * The sole user right now is intel_pipe_update_start(),
-	 * which won't race with psr_enable/disable, which is
-	 * where psr2_enabled is written to. So, we don't need
-	 * to acquire the psr.lock. More importantly, we want the
-	 * latency inside intel_pipe_update_start() to be as low
-	 * as possible, so no need to acquire psr.lock when it is
-	 * not needed and will induce latencies in the atomic
-	 * update path.
-	 */
-
 	/* FIXME: Update this for PSR2 if we need to wait for idle */
 	if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * Max time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate +
-	 * 6 ms of exit training time + 1.5 ms of aux channel
-	 * handshake. 50 msec is defesive enough to cover everything.
+	 * From bspec: Panel Self Refresh (BDW+)
+	 * Max. time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate + 6 ms of
+	 * exit training time + 1.5 ms of aux channel handshake. 50 ms is
+	 * defensive enough to cover everything.
 	 */
 
 	return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_STATUS,
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2
  2018-08-24 23:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-08-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
@ 2018-08-24 23:18 ` Rodrigo Vivi
  2018-08-24 23:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
  2018-08-25  0:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2018-08-24 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:08:43PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> CI runs show PSR2 does not go to IDLE with selective update enabled on
> all PSR exit triggers. Specifically, logs indicate the hardware enters
> "SLEEP Selective Update" and not "IDLE Reset state', like the kernel
> expects, when vblank interrupts are enabled. This check was added for PSR1
> but incorrectly extended to PSR2, remove the check as it breaks tests
> and prints out misleading error messages.
> 
> v2: Split out non-code changes (Rodrigo)
> 
> Cc: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Fixes: c43dbcbbcc8c ("drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle")
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index da583a45e942..2cb931f3019b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -771,8 +771,6 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc_state->base.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> -	i915_reg_t reg;
> -	u32 mask;
>  
>  	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled || !new_crtc_state->has_psr)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -787,13 +785,10 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>  	 * not needed and will induce latencies in the atomic
>  	 * update path.
>  	 */
> -	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> -		reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS;
> -		mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
> -	} else {
> -		reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS;
> -		mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
> -	}
> +
> +	/* FIXME: Update this for PSR2 if we need to wait for idle */
> +	if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled))
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Max time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate +
> @@ -801,7 +796,8 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>  	 * handshake. 50 msec is defesive enough to cover everything.
>  	 */
>  
> -	return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask,
> +	return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_STATUS,
> +					 EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
>  					 EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_IDLE, 2, 50,
>  					 out_value);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle()
  2018-08-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
@ 2018-08-24 23:19   ` Rodrigo Vivi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2018-08-24 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:08:44PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> Added bspec reference, aligned text and documented the function.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 2cb931f3019b..aee64aee18fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -766,6 +766,16 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * intel_psr_wait_for_idle - wait for PSR1 to idle
> + * @new_crtc_state: new CRTC state
> + * @out_value: PSR status in case of failure
> + *
> + * This function is expected to be called from pipe_update_start() where it is
> + * not expected to race with PSR enable or disable.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 on success or -ETIMEOUT if PSR status does not idle.
> + */
>  int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>  			    u32 *out_value)
>  {
> @@ -775,25 +785,15 @@ int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>  	if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled || !new_crtc_state->has_psr)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The sole user right now is intel_pipe_update_start(),
> -	 * which won't race with psr_enable/disable, which is
> -	 * where psr2_enabled is written to. So, we don't need
> -	 * to acquire the psr.lock. More importantly, we want the
> -	 * latency inside intel_pipe_update_start() to be as low
> -	 * as possible, so no need to acquire psr.lock when it is
> -	 * not needed and will induce latencies in the atomic
> -	 * update path.
> -	 */
> -
>  	/* FIXME: Update this for PSR2 if we need to wait for idle */
>  	if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Max time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate +
> -	 * 6 ms of exit training time + 1.5 ms of aux channel
> -	 * handshake. 50 msec is defesive enough to cover everything.
> +	 * From bspec: Panel Self Refresh (BDW+)
> +	 * Max. time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate + 6 ms of
> +	 * exit training time + 1.5 ms of aux channel handshake. 50 ms is
> +	 * defensive enough to cover everything.
>  	 */
>  
>  	return __intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_STATUS,
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2
  2018-08-24 23:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-08-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
  2018-08-24 23:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Rodrigo Vivi
@ 2018-08-24 23:31 ` Patchwork
  2018-08-25  0:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-08-24 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48691/
State : success

== Summary ==

= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4704 -> Patchwork_10014 =

== Summary - SUCCESS ==

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/48691/revisions/1/mbox/

== Possible new issues ==

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_10014:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Warnings ====

    {igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move}:
      fi-cnl-psr:         DMESG-FAIL -> FAIL

    
== Known issues ==

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_10014 that come from known issues:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Issues hit ====

    igt@drv_selftest@live_hangcheck:
      {fi-cfl-8109u}:     PASS -> DMESG-FAIL (fdo#106560)

    igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
      fi-bxt-dsi:         PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103927)

    
    ==== Possible fixes ====

    igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@hang-read-crc-pipe-b:
      fi-skl-guc:         FAIL (fdo#103191) -> PASS +1
      {fi-byt-clapper}:   FAIL (fdo#107362, fdo#103191) -> PASS

    igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
      fi-skl-6260u:       INCOMPLETE (fdo#104108) -> PASS

    {igt@kms_psr@primary_mmap_gtt}:
      fi-cnl-psr:         DMESG-WARN -> PASS +1

    
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  fdo#103191 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
  fdo#103927 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
  fdo#104108 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
  fdo#106560 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106560
  fdo#107362 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107362


== Participating hosts (54 -> 48) ==

  Missing    (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-j1900 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 


== Build changes ==

    * Linux: CI_DRM_4704 -> Patchwork_10014

  CI_DRM_4704: eb9a20b20d4790be1561235f45e209fba02dc6c0 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4609: 0bc9763af77bbb37f2ed65cc39c398e88db7d8e3 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_10014: 45eabe700f63f7160911b083c0775e251871bc0e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

45eabe700f63 drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle()
62024ccae1a4 drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_10014/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2
  2018-08-24 23:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-08-24 23:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
@ 2018-08-25  0:20 ` Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-08-25  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48691/
State : success

== Summary ==

= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4704_full -> Patchwork_10014_full =

== Summary - SUCCESS ==

  No regressions found.

  

== Known issues ==

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_10014_full that come from known issues:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Issues hit ====

    igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3:
      shard-kbl:          PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103665) +1

    igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
      shard-glk:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105363)

    igt@kms_setmode@basic:
      shard-kbl:          PASS -> FAIL (fdo#99912)

    
    ==== Possible fixes ====

    igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle:
      shard-hsw:          FAIL (fdo#103355) -> PASS

    igt@kms_setmode@basic:
      shard-apl:          FAIL (fdo#99912) -> PASS

    igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
      shard-hsw:          FAIL (fdo#104894) -> PASS

    
  fdo#103355 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
  fdo#103665 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
  fdo#104894 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
  fdo#105363 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105363
  fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912


== Participating hosts (5 -> 5) ==

  No changes in participating hosts


== Build changes ==

    * Linux: CI_DRM_4704 -> Patchwork_10014

  CI_DRM_4704: eb9a20b20d4790be1561235f45e209fba02dc6c0 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4609: 0bc9763af77bbb37f2ed65cc39c398e88db7d8e3 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_10014: 45eabe700f63f7160911b083c0775e251871bc0e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_10014/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-25  0:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-24 23:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-08-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Rewrite comments in intel_psr_wait_for_idle() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-08-24 23:19   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-24 23:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/psr: Remove wait_for_idle() for PSR2 Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-24 23:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2018-08-25  0:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox