public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/i915/psr: Always wait for idle state when disabling PSR
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:45:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026164517.GD2232@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026011737.23684-2-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 06:17:29PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
> could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
> still being disabled asynchronously userspace could change the
> modeset causing a call to psr_disable() that will not wait for PSR
> idle and then PSR will be enabled again while PSR is still not idle.
> 
> v2: rebased on top of the patch reusing psr_exit()
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 41 ++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index f698b3f45c6d..4c226b78c3fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -661,8 +661,12 @@ static void intel_psr_exit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
>  
> -	if (!dev_priv->psr.active)
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.active) {
> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)

This should be PSR2 check instead of platform no?!

> +			WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> +		WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
>  		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL);
> @@ -680,32 +684,23 @@ static void
>  intel_psr_disable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	i915_reg_t psr_status;
> +	u32 psr_status_mask;
>  
> -	if (dev_priv->psr.active) {
> -		i915_reg_t psr_status;
> -		u32 psr_status_mask;
> -
> -		intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
> +	intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
>  
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> -			psr_status = EDP_PSR2_STATUS;
> -			psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
> -		} else {
> -			psr_status = EDP_PSR_STATUS;
> -			psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* Wait till PSR is idle */
> -		if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> -					    psr_status, psr_status_mask, 0,
> -					    2000))
> -			DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> +		psr_status = EDP_PSR2_STATUS;
> +		psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
>  	} else {
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled)
> -			WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> -		else
> -			WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> +		psr_status = EDP_PSR_STATUS;
> +		psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Wait till PSR is idle */
> +	if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, psr_status, psr_status_mask, 0,
> +				    2000))
> +		DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting PSR idle state\n");
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-26 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-26  1:17 [PATCH v3 01/10] drm/i915/psr: Use intel_psr_exit() in intel_psr_disable_source() José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/i915/psr: Always wait for idle state when disabling PSR José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26 16:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-10-26 17:10     ` Souza, Jose
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/i915/psr: Move intel_psr_disable_source() code to intel_psr_disable_locked() José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/i915: Avoid a full port detection in the first eDP short pulse José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/i915: Check PSR errors instead of retrain while PSR is enabled José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915: Unmask PSR interruptions before assert IIR José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26 17:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/i915/icl: Reset PSR interruptions José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26 17:13   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/i915: Disable PSR when a PSR aux error happen José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/i915: Keep PSR disabled after a driver reload after a PSR error José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26 17:53   ` Souza, Jose
2018-10-26 18:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-26 19:34       ` Souza, Jose
2018-10-29 11:18         ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-31 23:45   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-11-06  0:00     ` Souza, Jose
2018-10-26  1:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/i915: Do not enable PSR in the next modeset after a error José Roberto de Souza
2018-10-26  1:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,01/10] drm/i915/psr: Use intel_psr_exit() in intel_psr_disable_source() Patchwork
2018-10-26  1:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-26  1:47 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181026164517.GD2232@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox