public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Apply LUT validation checks to platforms more accurately (v2)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:12:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131011249.GC10103@mdroper-desk.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130142847.GL20097@intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:49:28PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > Use of the new DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING test was a bit over-zealous;
> > it doesn't actually need to be applied to the degamma on "bdw-style"
> > platforms.  Likewise, we overlooked the fact that CHV should have that
> > test applied to the gamma LUT as well as the degamma LUT.
> > 
> > Rather than adding more complicated platform checking to
> > intel_color_check(), let's just store the appropriate set of LUT
> > validation flags for each platform in the intel_device_info structure.
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Shuffle around LUT size tests so that the hardware-specific tests
> >    won't be applied to legacy gamma tables.  (Ville)
> >  - Add a debug message so that it will be easier to understand why an
> >    atomic transaction involving incorrectly-sized LUT's got rejected
> >    by the driver.
> > 
> > Fixes: 85e2d61e4976 ("drm/i915: Validate userspace-provided color management LUT's (v4)")
> > References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2019-January/187634.html
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          | 10 ++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c       | 58 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > index 44c23ac60347..17f5a605b0b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > @@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
> >  #define BDW_COLORS \
> >  	.color = { .degamma_lut_size = 512, .gamma_lut_size = 512 }
> >  #define CHV_COLORS \
> > -	.color = { .degamma_lut_size = 65, .gamma_lut_size = 257 }
> > +	.color = { .degamma_lut_size = 65, .gamma_lut_size = 257, \
> > +		   .degamma_lut_tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING, \
> > +		   .gamma_lut_tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING, \
> > +	}
> >  #define GLK_COLORS \
> > -	.color = { .degamma_lut_size = 0, .gamma_lut_size = 1024 }
> > +	.color = { .degamma_lut_size = 0, .gamma_lut_size = 1024, \
> > +		   .degamma_lut_tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING | \
> > +					DRM_COLOR_LUT_EQUAL_CHANNELS, \
> > +	}
> >  
> >  /* Keep in gen based order, and chronological order within a gen */
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> > index bc7589656a8f..59b8a644b218 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> > @@ -605,48 +605,48 @@ void intel_color_load_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  	dev_priv->display.load_luts(crtc_state);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int check_lut_size(const struct drm_property_blob *lut, size_t expected)
> > +{
> > +	size_t len;
> 
> I'd probably just use int here. size_t makes me think it's in bytes or
> something like that.
> 
> Otherwise lgtm. Either way
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Switched to int's and BAT is still happy, so applied to dinq.  Thanks
for the review.


Matt

> 
> > +
> > +	if (!lut)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	len = drm_color_lut_size(lut);
> > +	if (len != expected) {
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid LUT size; got %lu, expected %lu\n",
> > +			      len, expected);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
> >  	size_t gamma_length, degamma_length;
> > -	uint32_t tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING;
> > +	u32 gamma_tests, degamma_tests;
> >  
> >  	degamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_size;
> >  	gamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
> > +	degamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_tests;
> > +	gamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_tests;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * All of our platforms mandate that the degamma curve be
> > -	 * non-decreasing.  Additionally, GLK and gen11 only accept a single
> > -	 * value for red, green, and blue in the degamma table.  Make sure
> > -	 * userspace didn't try to pass us something we can't handle.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * We don't have any extra hardware constraints on the gamma table,
> > -	 * so no need to explicitly check it.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > -		tests |= DRM_COLOR_LUT_EQUAL_CHANNELS;
> > +	/* Always allow legacy gamma LUT with no further checking. */
> > +	if (crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma(crtc_state))
> > +		return 0;
> >  
> > -	if (drm_color_lut_check(crtc_state->base.degamma_lut, tests) != 0)
> > +	if (check_lut_size(crtc_state->base.degamma_lut, degamma_length) ||
> > +	    check_lut_size(crtc_state->base.gamma_lut, gamma_length))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We allow both degamma & gamma luts at the right size or
> > -	 * NULL.
> > -	 */
> > -	if ((!crtc_state->base.degamma_lut ||
> > -	     drm_color_lut_size(crtc_state->base.degamma_lut) == degamma_length) &&
> > -	    (!crtc_state->base.gamma_lut ||
> > -	     drm_color_lut_size(crtc_state->base.gamma_lut) == gamma_length))
> > -		return 0;
> > +	if (drm_color_lut_check(crtc_state->base.degamma_lut, degamma_tests) ||
> > +	    drm_color_lut_check(crtc_state->base.gamma_lut, gamma_tests))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We also allow no degamma lut/ctm and a gamma lut at the legacy
> > -	 * size (256 entries).
> > -	 */
> > -	if (crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma(crtc_state))
> > -		return 0;
> >  
> > -	return -EINVAL;
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> > index 957c6527f76b..7bf09cef591a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> > @@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ struct intel_device_info {
> >  	struct color_luts {
> >  		u16 degamma_lut_size;
> >  		u16 gamma_lut_size;
> > +		u32 degamma_lut_tests;
> > +		u32 gamma_lut_tests;
> >  	} color;
> >  };
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.14.5
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-31  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-26  1:28 [PATCH] drm/i915: Apply LUT validation checks to platforms more accurately Matt Roper
2019-01-26  2:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-01-26  3:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-01-26  8:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-01-28 20:05 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-01-30  0:49   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Apply LUT validation checks to platforms more accurately (v2) Matt Roper
2019-01-30 14:28     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-01-30 18:10       ` [CI] drm/i915: Apply LUT validation checks to platforms more accurately (v3) Matt Roper
2019-01-31  1:12       ` Matt Roper [this message]
2019-01-30  1:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Apply LUT validation checks to platforms more accurately (rev2) Patchwork
2019-01-30  1:29 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-01-30  6:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-01-30 18:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Apply LUT validation checks to platforms more accurately (rev3) Patchwork
2019-01-30 19:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-01-31  1:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190131011249.GC10103@mdroper-desk.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox