From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Remove redundant on stack dpll_hw_state from icl_get_dpll()
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 19:32:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207173230.22368-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207173230.22368-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Just store the stuff directly into crtc_state->dpll_hw_state rather
than to a temp and copying the whole thing over.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 35 +++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 879f405d9742..fa2e5aae3f72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2525,10 +2525,9 @@ static bool icl_calc_tbt_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
}
static bool icl_calc_dpll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder, int clock,
- struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
+ struct intel_encoder *encoder)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
u32 cfgcr0, cfgcr1;
struct skl_wrpll_params pll_params = { 0 };
bool ret;
@@ -2553,8 +2552,12 @@ static bool icl_calc_dpll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
DPLL_CFGCR1_PDIV(pll_params.pdiv) |
DPLL_CFGCR1_CENTRAL_FREQ_8400;
- pll_state->cfgcr0 = cfgcr0;
- pll_state->cfgcr1 = cfgcr1;
+ memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
+ sizeof(crtc_state->dpll_hw_state));
+
+ crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr0 = cfgcr0;
+ crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1 = cfgcr1;
+
return true;
}
@@ -2718,12 +2721,12 @@ static bool icl_mg_pll_find_divisors(int clock_khz, bool is_dp, bool use_ssc,
* The specification for this function uses real numbers, so the math had to be
* adapted to integer-only calculation, that's why it looks so different.
*/
-static bool icl_calc_mg_pll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder, int clock,
- struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
+static bool icl_calc_mg_pll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
+ struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
int refclk_khz = dev_priv->cdclk.hw.ref;
+ int clock = crtc_state->port_clock;
u32 dco_khz, m1div, m2div_int, m2div_rem, m2div_frac;
u32 iref_ndiv, iref_trim, iref_pulse_w;
u32 prop_coeff, int_coeff;
@@ -2733,6 +2736,8 @@ static bool icl_calc_mg_pll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
bool use_ssc = false;
bool is_dp = !intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI);
+ memset(pll_state, 0, sizeof(*pll_state));
+
if (!icl_mg_pll_find_divisors(clock, is_dp, use_ssc, &dco_khz,
pll_state)) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to find divisors for clock %d\n", clock);
@@ -2888,17 +2893,14 @@ icl_get_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port;
struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
- struct intel_dpll_hw_state pll_state = {};
enum port port = encoder->port;
enum intel_dpll_id min, max;
- int clock = crtc_state->port_clock;
bool ret;
if (intel_port_is_combophy(dev_priv, port)) {
min = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL0;
max = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL1;
- ret = icl_calc_dpll_state(crtc_state, encoder, clock,
- &pll_state);
+ ret = icl_calc_dpll_state(crtc_state, encoder);
} else if (intel_port_is_tc(dev_priv, port)) {
if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST) {
struct intel_dp_mst_encoder *mst_encoder;
@@ -2912,16 +2914,14 @@ icl_get_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
if (intel_dig_port->tc_type == TC_PORT_TBT) {
min = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL;
max = min;
- ret = icl_calc_dpll_state(crtc_state, encoder, clock,
- &pll_state);
+ ret = icl_calc_dpll_state(crtc_state, encoder);
} else {
enum tc_port tc_port;
tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
min = icl_tc_port_to_pll_id(tc_port);
max = min;
- ret = icl_calc_mg_pll_state(crtc_state, encoder, clock,
- &pll_state);
+ ret = icl_calc_mg_pll_state(crtc_state);
}
} else {
MISSING_CASE(port);
@@ -2933,7 +2933,6 @@ icl_get_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
return NULL;
}
- crtc_state->dpll_hw_state = pll_state;
pll = intel_find_shared_dpll(crtc_state, min, max);
if (!pll) {
--
2.19.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-07 17:32 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc to intel_find_shared_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc to intel_get_shared_dpll() and .get_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Pass crtc_state down to skl dpll funcs Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Remove redundant on stack dpll_hw_state from skl_get_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Pass crtc_state down to bxt dpll funcs Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Remove redundant on stack dpll_hw_state from bxt_get_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Pass crtc_state down to cnl dpll funcs Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Remove redundant on stack dpll_hw_state from cnl_get_dpll() Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Pass crtc_state down to icl dpll funcs Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Fix readout for cnl DPLL kdiv==3 Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 22:48 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Nuke icl_calc_dp_combo_pll_link() Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 17:32 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Remove the fragile array index -> link rate mapping Ville Syrjala
2019-02-07 23:11 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-02-08 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-02-07 18:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc to intel_find_shared_dpll() Patchwork
2019-02-07 18:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-07 20:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-02 0:28 ` [PATCH 01/13] " Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190207173230.22368-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox