From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915/icl: split pll functions
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:28:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190311162822.GB3888@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190309035727.25389-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:57:22PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> v2 of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/57618/
>
> Only difference is that patch 2 got replaced with a different one.
> Instead of passing a function pointer to write the pll, split the
> function in three and pass the different arguments for each type of
> plls as suggested by Ville. I think this is neater and cleaner as
> well.
>
> Lucas De Marchi (5):
> drm/i915/icl: split combo and mg pll enable
> drm/i915/icl: split pll enable in three steps
> drm/i915/icl: split combo and mg pll disable
> drm/i915/icl: split combo and tbt pll funcs
> drm/i915/icl: remove intel_dpll_is_combophy()
Series is
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-09 3:57 [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915/icl: split pll functions Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-09 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/icl: split combo and mg pll enable Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-09 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/icl: split pll enable in three steps Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-09 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/icl: split combo and mg pll disable Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-09 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/icl: split combo and tbt pll funcs Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-09 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915/icl: remove intel_dpll_is_combophy() Lucas De Marchi
2019-03-09 5:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: split pll functions (rev2) Patchwork
2019-03-09 10:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-03-11 16:28 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-03-14 23:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: split pll functions (rev3) Patchwork
2019-03-15 11:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190311162822.GB3888@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox