Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/psr: Move logic to get TPS registers values to another function
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:57:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312195743.8829-2-jose.souza@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312195743.8829-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

This will make hsw_activate_psr1() more easy to read and will make
future modification to TPS registers more easy to review and read.

v4: Rename new function to intel_psr1_get_tp_time() (Dhinakaran and
Rodrigo)

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index f534d2aa6406..813be3b81bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -434,33 +434,13 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
 }
 
-static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+static u32 intel_psr1_get_tp_time(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
-	u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
-	u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
-
-	/* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
-	 * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
-	 */
-	int idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
-
-	/* sink_sync_latency of 8 means source has to wait for more than 8
-	 * frames, we'll go with 9 frames for now
-	 */
-	idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
-
-	val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
-
-	val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
-	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
-		val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
-
-	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
-		val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
+	u32 val = 0;
 
 	if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us == 0)
-		val |=  EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
+		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
 	else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us;
 	else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
@@ -469,7 +449,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
 
 	if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us == 0)
-		val |=  EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
+		val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
 	else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us;
 	else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
@@ -483,6 +463,35 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	else
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
 
+	return val;
+}
+
+static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
+	u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
+	u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
+
+	/* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
+	 * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
+	 */
+	int idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
+
+	/* sink_sync_latency of 8 means source has to wait for more than 8
+	 * frames, we'll go with 9 frames for now
+	 */
+	idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
+	val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
+
+	val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
+	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
+		val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
+
+	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
+		val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
+
+	val |= intel_psr1_get_tp_time(intel_dp);
+
 	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
 		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
 
-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-12 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12 19:57 [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/i915/vbt: Parse and use the new field with PSR2 TP2/3 wakeup time José Roberto de Souza
2019-03-12 19:57 ` José Roberto de Souza [this message]
2019-03-12 19:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/icl+: Always use TPS2 or TPS3 when exiting PSR1 José Roberto de Souza
2019-03-13 14:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v4,1/3] drm/i915/vbt: Parse and use the new field with PSR2 TP2/3 wakeup time Patchwork
2019-03-13 14:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-03-13 14:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-03-13 19:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-03-13 21:33   ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190312195743.8829-2-jose.souza@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox