From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC 2/8] drm/i915: Move IRQ related stuff from intel_rps to the new intel_irq.
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:53:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418205347.6402-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190418205347.6402-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The plan is to consolidate all IRQ related stuff together
under the new intel_irq.
So let's continue with RPS stuff.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 ++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 0b4aa818d66b..06617a67002c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -650,16 +650,12 @@ struct intel_rps_ei {
struct intel_irq {
/* protects the irq masks */
spinlock_t lock;
+ bool rps_interrupts_enabled;
+ u32 pm_iir;
};
struct intel_rps {
- /*
- * work, interrupts_enabled and pm_iir are protected by
- * dev_priv->irq.lock
- */
struct work_struct work;
- bool interrupts_enabled;
- u32 pm_iir;
/* PM interrupt bits that should never be masked */
u32 pm_intrmsk_mbz;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 679dc63244d9..487ea27ea152 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ void gen11_reset_rps_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
while (gen11_reset_one_iir(dev_priv, 0, GEN11_GTPM))
;
- dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.pm_iir = 0;
+ dev_priv->irq.pm_iir = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
}
@@ -528,46 +528,47 @@ void gen6_reset_rps_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
gen6_reset_pm_iir(dev_priv, GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
- dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.pm_iir = 0;
+ dev_priv->irq.pm_iir = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
}
void gen6_enable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps;
+ struct intel_irq *irq = &dev_priv->irq;
- if (READ_ONCE(rps->interrupts_enabled))
+ if (READ_ONCE(irq->rps_interrupts_enabled))
return;
- spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rps->pm_iir);
+ spin_lock_irq(&irq->lock);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(irq->pm_iir);
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
WARN_ON_ONCE(gen11_reset_one_iir(dev_priv, 0, GEN11_GTPM));
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(I915_READ(gen6_pm_iir(dev_priv)) & dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
- rps->interrupts_enabled = true;
+ irq->rps_interrupts_enabled = true;
gen6_enable_pm_irq(dev_priv, dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
- spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&irq->lock);
}
void gen6_disable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps;
+ struct intel_irq *irq = &dev_priv->irq;
- if (!READ_ONCE(rps->interrupts_enabled))
+ if (!READ_ONCE(irq->rps_interrupts_enabled))
return;
- spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
- rps->interrupts_enabled = false;
+ spin_lock_irq(&irq->lock);
+ irq->rps_interrupts_enabled = false;
I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_sanitize_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, ~0u));
gen6_disable_pm_irq(dev_priv, GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
- spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&irq->lock);
synchronize_irq(dev_priv->drm.irq);
/* Now that we will not be generating any more work, flush any
@@ -1290,8 +1291,8 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
u32 pm_iir = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
- if (rps->interrupts_enabled) {
- pm_iir = fetch_and_zero(&rps->pm_iir);
+ if (dev_priv->irq.rps_interrupts_enabled) {
+ pm_iir = fetch_and_zero(&dev_priv->irq.pm_iir);
client_boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
@@ -1372,7 +1373,7 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
out:
/* Make sure not to corrupt PMIMR state used by ringbuffer on GEN6 */
spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
- if (rps->interrupts_enabled)
+ if (dev_priv->irq.rps_interrupts_enabled)
gen6_unmask_pm_irq(dev_priv, dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
}
@@ -1843,6 +1844,7 @@ static void i9xx_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
static void gen11_rps_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 pm_iir)
{
struct intel_rps *rps = &i915->gt_pm.rps;
+ struct intel_irq *irq = &i915->irq;
const u32 events = i915->pm_rps_events & pm_iir;
lockdep_assert_held(&i915->irq.lock);
@@ -1852,22 +1854,23 @@ static void gen11_rps_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 pm_iir)
gen6_mask_pm_irq(i915, events);
- if (!rps->interrupts_enabled)
+ if (!irq->rps_interrupts_enabled)
return;
- rps->pm_iir |= events;
+ irq->pm_iir |= events;
schedule_work(&rps->work);
}
static void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
{
struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps;
+ struct intel_irq *irq = &dev_priv->irq;
if (pm_iir & dev_priv->pm_rps_events) {
spin_lock(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
gen6_mask_pm_irq(dev_priv, pm_iir & dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
- if (rps->interrupts_enabled) {
- rps->pm_iir |= pm_iir & dev_priv->pm_rps_events;
+ if (irq->rps_interrupts_enabled) {
+ irq->pm_iir |= pm_iir & dev_priv->pm_rps_events;
schedule_work(&rps->work);
}
spin_unlock(&dev_priv->irq.lock);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-18 20:53 [RFC 0/8] Start some re-org around IRQ Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 1/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_irq Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2019-04-18 21:15 ` [RFC 2/8] drm/i915: Move IRQ related stuff from intel_rps to the new intel_irq Chris Wilson
2019-04-18 22:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 3/8] drm/i915: Move display_irqs_enabled to intel_irq Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Consolidated iir, imr and ier Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 5/8] drm/i915: Move all irq related masks to intel_irq Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 6/8] drm/i915: Prefer passing intel_irq instead of intel_core Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 7/8] drm/i915: Start the conversion from passing intel_irq instead of dev_priv/i915 Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 20:53 ` [RFC 8/8] drm/i915: Migrate more gen11 irq functions towards intel_irq and uncore funcs Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-18 21:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Start some re-org around IRQ Patchwork
2019-04-18 21:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-04-19 0:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190418205347.6402-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox