Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Fix MG_DP_MODE() register programming
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:04:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190419160444.GB972@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8e59209982585690e185f83f6cf21be85eb4a14.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 07:02:10PM +0300, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 10:10 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Fix the order of lane, port parameters passed to the register macro.
> > 
> > Note that this was already partly fixed by commit
> > 37fc7845df7b6 ("drm/i915: Call MG_DP_MODE() macro with the right
> > parameters order")
> > 
> > Fixes: 58106b7d816e1 ("drm/i915: Make MG PHY macros semantically
> > consistent")
> > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index 24f9106efcc6..f181c26f62fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -2905,21 +2905,20 @@ static void
> > icl_enable_phy_clock_gating(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> > >base.base.dev);
> >  	enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> >  	enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> > -	i915_reg_t mg_regs[2] = { MG_DP_MODE(0, port), MG_DP_MODE(1,
> > port) };
> >  	u32 val;
> > -	int i;
> > +	int ln;
> >  
> >  	if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mg_regs); i++) {
> > -		val = I915_READ(mg_regs[i]);
> > +	for (ln = 0; ln < 2; ln++) {
> > +		val = I915_READ(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port));
> >  		val |= MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TR2PWR_GATING |
> >  		       MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TRPWR_GATING |
> >  		       MG_DP_MODE_CFG_CLNPWR_GATING |
> >  		       MG_DP_MODE_CFG_DIGPWR_GATING |
> >  		       MG_DP_MODE_CFG_GAONPWR_GATING;
> > -		I915_WRITE(mg_regs[i], val);
> > +		I915_WRITE(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port), val);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	val = I915_READ(MG_MISC_SUS0(tc_port));
> > @@ -2938,21 +2937,20 @@ static void
> > icl_disable_phy_clock_gating(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> > >base.base.dev);
> >  	enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> >  	enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> > -	i915_reg_t mg_regs[2] = { MG_DP_MODE(port, 0), MG_DP_MODE(port,
> > 1) };
> 
> I would split this fix from the change dropping mg_regs or at least
> tell that while you were fixing it you changed the way it reads
> each MG_DP_MODE line.

I don't think it's worth a separate patch, since it's a small change
and quite obvious what and how changed. I can add a note to the commit
message about making things simpler.

> 
> 
> >  	u32 val;
> > -	int i;
> > +	int ln;
> >  
> >  	if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mg_regs); i++) {
> > -		val = I915_READ(mg_regs[i]);
> > +	for (ln = 0; ln < 2; ln++) {
> > +		val = I915_READ(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port));
> >  		val &= ~(MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TR2PWR_GATING |
> >  			 MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TRPWR_GATING |
> >  			 MG_DP_MODE_CFG_CLNPWR_GATING |
> >  			 MG_DP_MODE_CFG_DIGPWR_GATING |
> >  			 MG_DP_MODE_CFG_GAONPWR_GATING);
> > -		I915_WRITE(mg_regs[i], val);
> > +		I915_WRITE(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port), val);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	val = I915_READ(MG_MISC_SUS0(tc_port));


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-19 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-19  7:10 [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Fix MG_DP_MODE() register programming Imre Deak
2019-04-19  7:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-04-19  7:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-04-19  8:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-04-23  8:13   ` Imre Deak
2019-04-19 16:02 ` [PATCH] " Souza, Jose
2019-04-19 16:04   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2019-04-19 16:29     ` Souza, Jose
2019-04-19 17:01       ` Imre Deak
2019-04-22 16:15 ` Lucas De Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190419160444.GB972@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox