From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Fix MG_DP_MODE() register programming
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:02:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8e59209982585690e185f83f6cf21be85eb4a14.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190419071026.32370-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3016 bytes --]
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 10:10 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Fix the order of lane, port parameters passed to the register macro.
>
> Note that this was already partly fixed by commit
> 37fc7845df7b6 ("drm/i915: Call MG_DP_MODE() macro with the right
> parameters order")
>
> Fixes: 58106b7d816e1 ("drm/i915: Make MG PHY macros semantically
> consistent")
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 24f9106efcc6..f181c26f62fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2905,21 +2905,20 @@ static void
> icl_enable_phy_clock_gating(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> >base.base.dev);
> enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> - i915_reg_t mg_regs[2] = { MG_DP_MODE(0, port), MG_DP_MODE(1,
> port) };
> u32 val;
> - int i;
> + int ln;
>
> if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mg_regs); i++) {
> - val = I915_READ(mg_regs[i]);
> + for (ln = 0; ln < 2; ln++) {
> + val = I915_READ(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port));
> val |= MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TR2PWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TRPWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_CLNPWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_DIGPWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_GAONPWR_GATING;
> - I915_WRITE(mg_regs[i], val);
> + I915_WRITE(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port), val);
> }
>
> val = I915_READ(MG_MISC_SUS0(tc_port));
> @@ -2938,21 +2937,20 @@ static void
> icl_disable_phy_clock_gating(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port-
> >base.base.dev);
> enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv, port);
> - i915_reg_t mg_regs[2] = { MG_DP_MODE(port, 0), MG_DP_MODE(port,
> 1) };
I would split this fix from the change dropping mg_regs or at least
tell that while you were fixing it you changed the way it reads
each MG_DP_MODE line.
> u32 val;
> - int i;
> + int ln;
>
> if (tc_port == PORT_TC_NONE)
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mg_regs); i++) {
> - val = I915_READ(mg_regs[i]);
> + for (ln = 0; ln < 2; ln++) {
> + val = I915_READ(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port));
> val &= ~(MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TR2PWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_TRPWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_CLNPWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_DIGPWR_GATING |
> MG_DP_MODE_CFG_GAONPWR_GATING);
> - I915_WRITE(mg_regs[i], val);
> + I915_WRITE(MG_DP_MODE(ln, port), val);
> }
>
> val = I915_READ(MG_MISC_SUS0(tc_port));
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-19 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-19 7:10 [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Fix MG_DP_MODE() register programming Imre Deak
2019-04-19 7:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-04-19 7:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-04-19 8:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-04-23 8:13 ` Imre Deak
2019-04-19 16:02 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2019-04-19 16:04 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2019-04-19 16:29 ` Souza, Jose
2019-04-19 17:01 ` Imre Deak
2019-04-22 16:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8e59209982585690e185f83f6cf21be85eb4a14.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox