From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Enable pipe HDR mode on ICL if only HDR planes are used
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:37:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426143715.GP24299@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a2a7f7d-7799-8b22-db7e-db73418a95c6@intel.com>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 06:40:11PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>
> On 4/13/2019 12:00 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The pipe has a special HDR mode with higher precision when only
> > HDR planes are active. Let's use it.
> >
> > Curiously this fixes the kms_color gamma/degamma tests when
> > using a HDR plane, which is always the case unless one hacks
> > the test to use an SDR plane. If one does hack the test to use
> > an SDR plane it does pass already.
> >
> > I have no actual explanation how the output after the gamma
> > LUT can be different between the two modes. The way the tests
> > are written should mean that the output should be identical
> > between the solid color vs. the gradient. But clearly that
> > somehow doesn't hold true for the HDR planes in non-HDR pipe
> > mode. Anyways, as long as we stick to one type of plane the
> > test should produce sensible results now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 7 +++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.h | 12 ++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 8ad2f0a03f28..90d60ecd3317 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -5767,6 +5767,7 @@ enum {
> > #define _PIPE_MISC_B 0x71030
> > #define PIPEMISC_YUV420_ENABLE (1 << 27)
> > #define PIPEMISC_YUV420_MODE_FULL_BLEND (1 << 26)
> > +#define PIPEMISC_HDR_MODE (1 << 23) /* icl+ */
> > #define PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_COLORSPACE_YUV (1 << 11)
> > #define PIPEMISC_DITHER_BPC_MASK (7 << 5)
> > #define PIPEMISC_DITHER_8_BPC (0 << 5)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 490bd49ff42a..d0dbdbd5db3f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -4055,6 +4055,9 @@ static void intel_update_pipe_config(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_sta
> > ironlake_pfit_disable(old_crtc_state);
> > }
> >
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> > + bdw_set_pipemisc(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > icl_set_pipe_chicken(crtc);
> > }
> > @@ -8869,6 +8872,10 @@ static void bdw_set_pipemisc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > val |= PIPEMISC_YUV420_ENABLE |
> > PIPEMISC_YUV420_MODE_FULL_BLEND;
> >
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 &&
> > + (crtc_state->active_planes & ~icl_hdr_plane_mask()) == 0)
> > + val |= PIPEMISC_HDR_MODE;
> > +
>
> Shouldn't we check if the content being played on plane is HDR before
> enabling this bit (even though I am not sure if there is any harm in
> doing that)? Or maybe check the connector->output_hdr_metadata ? Most of
> the times we would be sending SDR buffers on this plane. What happens
> exactly when we set this bit ? The bspec says:
>
> "This field enables the HDR mode, allowing for higher precision output
> from the HDR supporting planes and bypassing the SDR planes in blending. "
I think the bit is just misnamed (like most things with "HDR" in their
name). It's just a "gimme moar precision" bit.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 18:30 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Flatten and rename haswell_set_pipemisc() Ville Syrjala
2019-04-12 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Enable pipe HDR mode on ICL if only HDR planes are used Ville Syrjala
2019-04-26 13:10 ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-04-26 14:37 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-04-30 4:52 ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-04-30 10:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-30 13:43 ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-04-30 19:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-30 9:17 ` Shankar, Uma
2019-04-12 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Flatten and rename haswell_set_pipemisc() Chris Wilson
2019-04-12 19:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2019-04-12 23:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190426143715.GP24299@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox