From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Constify intel_pipe_config_compare()
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:25:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190618122527.GC3733@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612130801.2085-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:07:59PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Now that intel_pipe_config_compare() no longer clobbers the passed
> in state we can make both crtc states const. And while at we simplify
> the calling convention, and clean up intel_compare_link_m_n() a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 43 +++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 73b3e92b7ed5..dcc301df6174 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -12291,18 +12291,14 @@ intel_compare_m_n(unsigned int m, unsigned int n,
>
> static bool
> intel_compare_link_m_n(const struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
> - struct intel_link_m_n *m2_n2,
> - bool adjust)
> -{
> - if (m_n->tu == m2_n2->tu &&
> - intel_compare_m_n(m_n->gmch_m, m_n->gmch_n,
> - m2_n2->gmch_m, m2_n2->gmch_n, !adjust) &&
> - intel_compare_m_n(m_n->link_m, m_n->link_n,
> - m2_n2->link_m, m2_n2->link_n, !adjust)) {
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> + const struct intel_link_m_n *m2_n2,
> + bool exact)
> +{
> + return m_n->tu == m2_n2->tu &&
> + intel_compare_m_n(m_n->gmch_m, m_n->gmch_n,
> + m2_n2->gmch_m, m2_n2->gmch_n, exact) &&
> + intel_compare_m_n(m_n->link_m, m_n->link_n,
> + m2_n2->link_m, m2_n2->link_n, exact);
> }
>
> static bool
> @@ -12372,11 +12368,11 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> }
>
> static bool
> -intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> +intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> bool adjust)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(current_config->base.crtc->dev);
> bool ret = true;
> bool fixup_inherited = adjust &&
> (current_config->base.mode.private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED) &&
> @@ -12447,7 +12443,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_M_N(name) do { \
> if (!intel_compare_link_m_n(¤t_config->name, \
> &pipe_config->name,\
> - adjust)) { \
> + !adjust)) { \
> pipe_config_err(adjust, __stringify(name), \
> "(expected tu %i gmch %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> "found tu %i, gmch %i/%i link %i/%i)\n", \
> @@ -12472,9 +12468,9 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> */
> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_M_N_ALT(name, alt_name) do { \
> if (!intel_compare_link_m_n(¤t_config->name, \
> - &pipe_config->name, adjust) && \
> + &pipe_config->name, !adjust) && \
> !intel_compare_link_m_n(¤t_config->alt_name, \
> - &pipe_config->name, adjust)) { \
> + &pipe_config->name, !adjust)) { \
> pipe_config_err(adjust, __stringify(name), \
> "(expected tu %i gmch %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> "or tu %i gmch %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> @@ -12984,8 +12980,7 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>
> sw_config = to_intel_crtc_state(new_crtc_state);
> - if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(dev_priv, sw_config,
> - pipe_config, false)) {
> + if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(sw_config, pipe_config, false)) {
> I915_STATE_WARN(1, "pipe state doesn't match!\n");
> intel_dump_pipe_config(pipe_config, NULL, "[hw state]");
> intel_dump_pipe_config(sw_config, NULL, "[sw state]");
> @@ -13430,14 +13425,10 @@ static int calc_watermark_data(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void intel_crtc_check_fastset(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> +static void intel_crtc_check_fastset(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> - to_i915(new_crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
> -
> - if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(dev_priv, old_crtc_state,
> - new_crtc_state, true))
> + if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, true))
> return;
>
> new_crtc_state->base.mode_changed = false;
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 13:07 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Don't clobber M/N values during fastset check Ville Syrjala
2019-06-12 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Constify intel_pipe_config_compare() Ville Syrjala
2019-06-18 12:25 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2019-06-12 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Make pipe_config_err() vs. fastset less confusing Ville Syrjala
2019-06-12 15:43 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-12 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Drop the _INCOMPLETE for has_infoframe Ville Syrjala
2019-06-18 12:34 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-18 12:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-18 13:28 ` Imre Deak
2019-06-12 13:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Don't clobber M/N values during fastset check Patchwork
2019-06-12 13:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-06-12 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Ville Syrjala
2019-06-13 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-06-18 12:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Imre Deak
2019-06-15 22:16 ` Sasha Levin
2019-06-12 18:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915: Don't clobber M/N values during fastset check (rev2) Patchwork
2019-06-12 19:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-06-14 13:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190618122527.GC3733@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox