* [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests
@ 2019-07-24 12:43 Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 12:50 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 16:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev2) Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-07-24 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Under some circumstances (see intel_context_prepare_remote_request), we
may use a requst along a kernel context to modify the logical state of
another. To keep the target context in place while the request executes,
we take an active reference on it using the kernel timeline. This is the
same timeline as we use for the idle-barrier, and so we end up reusing
the same active node. Except that the idle barrier is special and cannot
be reused in this manner! Give the idle-barrier a reserved timeline
index (0) so that is will always be unique (give or take we may issue
multiple idle barriers across multiple engines).
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: ce476c80b8bf ("drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch")
Fixes: a9877da2d629 ("drm/i915/oa: Reconfigure contexts on the fly")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index 13f304a29fc8..4f7f698bff15 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
ref->cache = node;
mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*node), base));
return &node->base;
}
@@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
struct i915_active_request *active;
int err;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!timeline); /* reserved for idle-barrier */
+
/* Prevent reaping in case we malloc/wait while building the tree */
err = i915_active_acquire(ref);
if (err)
@@ -342,6 +345,31 @@ void i915_active_fini(struct i915_active *ref)
}
#endif
+static struct active_node *idle_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
+{
+ struct active_node *node = NULL;
+ struct rb_node *rb;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ref->mutex);
+
+ rb = rb_first(&ref->tree);
+ if (!rb)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ node = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*node), node);
+ if (node->timeline || i915_active_request_isset(&node->base)) {
+ node = NULL;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->base.link));
+ rb_erase(rb, &ref->tree);
+
+unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex);
+ return node;
+}
+
int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
@@ -352,22 +380,29 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->mask);
for_each_engine_masked(engine, i915, engine->mask, tmp) {
- struct intel_context *kctx = engine->kernel_context;
struct active_node *node;
- node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (unlikely(!node)) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto unwind;
+ node = idle_barrier(ref);
+ if (!node) {
+ node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache,
+ GFP_KERNEL |
+ __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+ __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (unlikely(!node)) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unwind;
+ }
+
+ node->ref = ref;
+ node->timeline = 0;
+ node->base.retire = node_retire;
}
- i915_active_request_init(&node->base,
- (void *)engine, node_retire);
- node->timeline = kctx->ring->timeline->fence_context;
- node->ref = ref;
+ intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
+
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.request, (void *)engine);
atomic_inc(&ref->count);
- intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
llist_add((struct llist_node *)&node->base.link,
&ref->barriers);
}
@@ -402,6 +437,7 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
node = container_of((struct list_head *)pos,
typeof(*node), base.link);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(node->timeline);
engine = (void *)rcu_access_pointer(node->base.request);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.request, ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
@@ -410,12 +446,7 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
p = &ref->tree.rb_node;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
- if (rb_entry(parent,
- struct active_node,
- node)->timeline < node->timeline)
- p = &parent->rb_right;
- else
- p = &parent->rb_left;
+ p = &parent->rb_left;
}
rb_link_node(&node->node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&node->node, &ref->tree);
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests
2019-07-24 12:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests Chris Wilson
@ 2019-07-24 12:50 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 16:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev2) Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-07-24 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Under some circumstances (see intel_context_prepare_remote_request), we
may use a request along a kernel context to modify the logical state of
another. To keep the target context in place while the request executes,
we take an active reference on it using the kernel timeline. This is the
same timeline as we use for the idle-barrier, and so we end up reusing
the same active node. Except that the idle barrier is special and cannot
be reused in this manner! Give the idle-barrier a reserved timeline
index (0) so that it will always be unique (give or take we may issue
multiple idle barriers across multiple engines).
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: ce476c80b8bf ("drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch")
Fixes: a9877da2d629 ("drm/i915/oa: Reconfigure contexts on the fly")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
Replace recursive attempt to acquire the i915_active.mutex with a
lockdep annotation.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index 13f304a29fc8..99bebd77f364 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
ref->cache = node;
mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*node), base));
return &node->base;
}
@@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
struct i915_active_request *active;
int err;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!timeline); /* reserved for idle-barrier */
+
/* Prevent reaping in case we malloc/wait while building the tree */
err = i915_active_acquire(ref);
if (err)
@@ -342,6 +345,26 @@ void i915_active_fini(struct i915_active *ref)
}
#endif
+static struct active_node *idle_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
+{
+ struct active_node *node;
+ struct rb_node *rb;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ref->mutex);
+ rb = rb_first(&ref->tree);
+ if (!rb)
+ return NULL;
+
+ node = rb_entry(rb, typeof(*node), node);
+ if (node->timeline || i915_active_request_isset(&node->base))
+ return NULL;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->base.link));
+ rb_erase(rb, &ref->tree);
+
+ return node;
+}
+
int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
@@ -352,22 +375,29 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->mask);
for_each_engine_masked(engine, i915, engine->mask, tmp) {
- struct intel_context *kctx = engine->kernel_context;
struct active_node *node;
- node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (unlikely(!node)) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto unwind;
+ node = idle_barrier(ref);
+ if (!node) {
+ node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache,
+ GFP_KERNEL |
+ __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+ __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (unlikely(!node)) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unwind;
+ }
+
+ node->ref = ref;
+ node->timeline = 0;
+ node->base.retire = node_retire;
}
- i915_active_request_init(&node->base,
- (void *)engine, node_retire);
- node->timeline = kctx->ring->timeline->fence_context;
- node->ref = ref;
+ intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
+
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.request, (void *)engine);
atomic_inc(&ref->count);
- intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
llist_add((struct llist_node *)&node->base.link,
&ref->barriers);
}
@@ -402,6 +432,7 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
node = container_of((struct list_head *)pos,
typeof(*node), base.link);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(node->timeline);
engine = (void *)rcu_access_pointer(node->base.request);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.request, ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
@@ -410,12 +441,7 @@ void i915_active_acquire_barrier(struct i915_active *ref)
p = &ref->tree.rb_node;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
- if (rb_entry(parent,
- struct active_node,
- node)->timeline < node->timeline)
- p = &parent->rb_right;
- else
- p = &parent->rb_left;
+ p = &parent->rb_left;
}
rb_link_node(&node->node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&node->node, &ref->tree);
--
2.22.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev2)
2019-07-24 12:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 12:50 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2019-07-24 16:35 ` Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-07-24 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/64171/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6545 -> Patchwork_13735
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_13735 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_13735, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_13735:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
- fi-snb-2520m: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6545/fi-snb-2520m/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/fi-snb-2520m/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_13735 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([fdo#105128] / [fdo#107139])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6545/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html
* igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a:
- fi-kbl-7567u: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#109278]) +2 similar issues
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6545/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([fdo#109485])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6545/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-icl-guc: [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([fdo#103167])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6545/fi-icl-guc/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/fi-icl-guc/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
- fi-icl-u2: [INCOMPLETE][11] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#109100]) -> [PASS][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6545/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#102505]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102505
[fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
[fdo#105128]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105128
[fdo#105602]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105602
[fdo#107139]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107139
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#109100]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109100
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109278]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
[fdo#109485]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109485
[fdo#111045]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
[fdo#111046 ]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111046
[fdo#111049]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111049
Participating hosts (52 -> 43)
------------------------------
Additional (1): fi-skl-gvtdvm
Missing (10): fi-kbl-soraka fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-cfl-8109u fi-pnv-d510 fi-icl-y fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_6545 -> Patchwork_13735
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_6545: a6efe73f1e086c7935d56b08342f9e1c5565fcf3 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5109: e5fd509e16ec649436be31f38eaa5b85cb7f72f1 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_13735: cf9d7252c06a11879a9cce16ad324a64f7055892 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
cf9d7252c06a drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13735/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-24 16:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-24 12:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 12:50 ` Chris Wilson
2019-07-24 16:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Unshare the idle-barrier from other kernel requests (rev2) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox