From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i915: do not leak module ref counter
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:35:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802133503.GA18318@tigerII.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190802131523.GB466@tigerII.localdomain>
On (08/02/19 22:15), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> > > Looking around, it looks like we always need to drop type after
> > > mounting. Should the
> > > put_filesystem(type);
> > > be here instead?
> > >
> > > Anyway, nice catch.
> >
> > Sigh. put_filesystem() is part of fs internals. I'd be tempted to add
>
> Good catch!
>
> So we can switch to vfs_kern_mount(), I guess, but pass different options,
> depending on has_transparent_hugepage().
Hmm. This doesn't look exactly right. It appears that vfs_kern_mount()
has a slightly different purpose. It's for drivers which register their
own fstype and fs_context/sb callbacks. A typical usage would be
static struct file_system_type nfsd_fs_type = {
.owner→ → = THIS_MODULE,
.name→ → = "nfsd",
.init_fs_context = nfsd_init_fs_context,
.kill_sb→ = nfsd_umount,
};
MODULE_ALIAS_FS("nfsd");
vfs_kern_mount(&nfsd_fs_type, SB_KERNMOUNT, "nfsd", NULL);
i915 is a different beast, it just wants to mount fs and reconfigure
it, it doesn't want to be an fs. So it seems that current kern_mount()
is actually right.
Maybe we need to export put_filesystem() instead.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 12:39 [PATCH 1/2] i915: convert to new mount API Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-02 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] i915: do not leak module ref counter Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-02 12:58 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-02 13:10 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-02 13:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-02 13:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-08-02 13:41 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-02 13:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-02 13:59 ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-02 12:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] i915: convert to new mount API Chris Wilson
2019-08-02 13:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-02 12:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2019-08-02 14:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] i915: convert to new mount API (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190802133503.GA18318@tigerII.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox