* [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously
@ 2019-10-31 23:29 Chris Wilson
2019-10-31 23:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-01 0:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3) Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-10-31 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Vanshidhar Konda asked for the simplest test "to verify that the kernel
can submit and hardware can execute batch buffers on all the command
streamers in parallel." We have a number of tests in userspace that
submit load to each engine and verify that it is present, but strictly
we have no selftest to prove that the kernel can _simultaneously_
execute on all known engines. (We have tests to demonstrate that we can
submit to HW in parallel, but we don't insist that they execute in
parallel.)
v2: Improve the igt_spinner support for older gen.
Suggested-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c | 36 ++++++---
3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index a22d969cb352..0c3ab6020bc6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -891,6 +891,10 @@ struct intel_cdclk_state {
u8 voltage_level;
};
+struct i915_selftest_stash {
+ atomic_t counter;
+};
+
struct drm_i915_private {
struct drm_device drm;
@@ -1286,6 +1290,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
/* Mutex to protect the above hdcp component related values. */
struct mutex hdcp_comp_mutex;
+ I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(struct i915_selftest_stash selftest;)
+
/*
* NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
* will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
index 30ae34f62176..4efc24c3eed7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include "i915_random.h"
#include "i915_selftest.h"
#include "igt_live_test.h"
+#include "igt_spinner.h"
#include "lib_sw_fence.h"
#include "mock_drm.h"
@@ -1115,12 +1116,85 @@ static int __live_parallel_engineN(void *arg)
return 0;
}
+static bool wake_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&i915->selftest.counter)) {
+ wake_up_var(&i915->selftest.counter);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int wait_for_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ if (wake_all(i915))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (wait_var_event_timeout(&i915->selftest.counter,
+ !atomic_read(&i915->selftest.counter),
+ i915_selftest.timeout_jiffies))
+ return 0;
+
+ return -ETIME;
+}
+
+static int __live_parallel_spin(void *arg)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine = arg;
+ struct igt_spinner spin;
+ struct i915_request *rq;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Create a spinner running for eternity on each engine. If a second
+ * spinner is incorrectly placed on the same engine, it will not be
+ * able to start in time.
+ */
+
+ if (igt_spinner_init(&spin, engine->gt)) {
+ wake_all(engine->i915);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin,
+ engine->kernel_context,
+ MI_NOOP); /* no preemption */
+ if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(rq);
+ if (err == -ENODEV)
+ err = 0;
+ wake_all(engine->i915);
+ goto out_spin;
+ }
+
+ i915_request_get(rq);
+ i915_request_add(rq);
+ if (igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin, rq)) {
+ /* Occupy this engine for the whole test */
+ err = wait_for_all(engine->i915);
+ } else {
+ pr_err("Failed to start spinner on %s\n", engine->name);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ igt_spinner_end(&spin);
+
+ if (err == 0 && i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0)
+ err = -EIO;
+ i915_request_put(rq);
+
+out_spin:
+ igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
+ return err;
+}
+
static int live_parallel_engines(void *arg)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
static int (* const func[])(void *arg) = {
__live_parallel_engine1,
__live_parallel_engineN,
+ __live_parallel_spin,
NULL,
};
const unsigned int nengines = num_uabi_engines(i915);
@@ -1146,6 +1220,8 @@ static int live_parallel_engines(void *arg)
if (err)
break;
+ atomic_set(&i915->selftest.counter, nengines);
+
idx = 0;
for_each_uabi_engine(engine, i915) {
tsk[idx] = kthread_run(*fn, engine,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
index ee8450b871da..20ca1134c1b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ int igt_spinner_init(struct igt_spinner *spin, struct intel_gt *gt)
void *vaddr;
int err;
- GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(gt->i915) < 8);
-
memset(spin, 0, sizeof(*spin));
spin->gt = gt;
@@ -100,6 +98,9 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin,
GEM_BUG_ON(spin->gt != ce->vm->gt);
+ if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(ce->engine))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
vma = i915_vma_instance(spin->obj, ce->vm, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(vma))
return ERR_CAST(vma);
@@ -132,16 +133,33 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin,
batch = spin->batch;
- *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
- *batch++ = lower_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
- *batch++ = upper_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
- *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) {
+ *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
+ *batch++ = lower_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
+ *batch++ = upper_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
+ *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 4) {
+ *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
+ *batch++ = 0;
+ *batch++ = hws_address(hws, rq);
+ *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ } else {
+ *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | MI_MEM_VIRTUAL;
+ *batch++ = hws_address(hws, rq);
+ *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ }
*batch++ = arbitration_command;
- *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | 1 << 8 | 1;
- *batch++ = lower_32_bits(vma->node.start);
- *batch++ = upper_32_bits(vma->node.start);
+ if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) {
+ *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | 1 << 8 | 1;
+ *batch++ = lower_32_bits(vma->node.start);
+ *batch++ = upper_32_bits(vma->node.start);
+ } else {
+ *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_GTT;
+ *batch++ = vma->node.start;
+ }
+
*batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END; /* not reached */
intel_gt_chipset_flush(engine->gt);
--
2.24.0.rc2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously
2019-10-31 23:29 [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously Chris Wilson
@ 2019-10-31 23:29 ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-01 0:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3) Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-10-31 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Vanshidhar Konda asked for the simplest test "to verify that the kernel
can submit and hardware can execute batch buffers on all the command
streamers in parallel." We have a number of tests in userspace that
submit load to each engine and verify that it is present, but strictly
we have no selftest to prove that the kernel can _simultaneously_
execute on all known engines. (We have tests to demonstrate that we can
submit to HW in parallel, but we don't insist that they execute in
parallel.)
v2: Improve the igt_spinner support for older gen.
Suggested-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c | 36 ++++++---
3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index a22d969cb352..0c3ab6020bc6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -891,6 +891,10 @@ struct intel_cdclk_state {
u8 voltage_level;
};
+struct i915_selftest_stash {
+ atomic_t counter;
+};
+
struct drm_i915_private {
struct drm_device drm;
@@ -1286,6 +1290,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
/* Mutex to protect the above hdcp component related values. */
struct mutex hdcp_comp_mutex;
+ I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(struct i915_selftest_stash selftest;)
+
/*
* NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
* will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
index 30ae34f62176..4efc24c3eed7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include "i915_random.h"
#include "i915_selftest.h"
#include "igt_live_test.h"
+#include "igt_spinner.h"
#include "lib_sw_fence.h"
#include "mock_drm.h"
@@ -1115,12 +1116,85 @@ static int __live_parallel_engineN(void *arg)
return 0;
}
+static bool wake_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&i915->selftest.counter)) {
+ wake_up_var(&i915->selftest.counter);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int wait_for_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ if (wake_all(i915))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (wait_var_event_timeout(&i915->selftest.counter,
+ !atomic_read(&i915->selftest.counter),
+ i915_selftest.timeout_jiffies))
+ return 0;
+
+ return -ETIME;
+}
+
+static int __live_parallel_spin(void *arg)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine = arg;
+ struct igt_spinner spin;
+ struct i915_request *rq;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Create a spinner running for eternity on each engine. If a second
+ * spinner is incorrectly placed on the same engine, it will not be
+ * able to start in time.
+ */
+
+ if (igt_spinner_init(&spin, engine->gt)) {
+ wake_all(engine->i915);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin,
+ engine->kernel_context,
+ MI_NOOP); /* no preemption */
+ if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(rq);
+ if (err == -ENODEV)
+ err = 0;
+ wake_all(engine->i915);
+ goto out_spin;
+ }
+
+ i915_request_get(rq);
+ i915_request_add(rq);
+ if (igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin, rq)) {
+ /* Occupy this engine for the whole test */
+ err = wait_for_all(engine->i915);
+ } else {
+ pr_err("Failed to start spinner on %s\n", engine->name);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ igt_spinner_end(&spin);
+
+ if (err == 0 && i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0)
+ err = -EIO;
+ i915_request_put(rq);
+
+out_spin:
+ igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
+ return err;
+}
+
static int live_parallel_engines(void *arg)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
static int (* const func[])(void *arg) = {
__live_parallel_engine1,
__live_parallel_engineN,
+ __live_parallel_spin,
NULL,
};
const unsigned int nengines = num_uabi_engines(i915);
@@ -1146,6 +1220,8 @@ static int live_parallel_engines(void *arg)
if (err)
break;
+ atomic_set(&i915->selftest.counter, nengines);
+
idx = 0;
for_each_uabi_engine(engine, i915) {
tsk[idx] = kthread_run(*fn, engine,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
index ee8450b871da..20ca1134c1b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ int igt_spinner_init(struct igt_spinner *spin, struct intel_gt *gt)
void *vaddr;
int err;
- GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(gt->i915) < 8);
-
memset(spin, 0, sizeof(*spin));
spin->gt = gt;
@@ -100,6 +98,9 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin,
GEM_BUG_ON(spin->gt != ce->vm->gt);
+ if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(ce->engine))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
vma = i915_vma_instance(spin->obj, ce->vm, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(vma))
return ERR_CAST(vma);
@@ -132,16 +133,33 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin,
batch = spin->batch;
- *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
- *batch++ = lower_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
- *batch++ = upper_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
- *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) {
+ *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
+ *batch++ = lower_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
+ *batch++ = upper_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq));
+ *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 4) {
+ *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4;
+ *batch++ = 0;
+ *batch++ = hws_address(hws, rq);
+ *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ } else {
+ *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | MI_MEM_VIRTUAL;
+ *batch++ = hws_address(hws, rq);
+ *batch++ = rq->fence.seqno;
+ }
*batch++ = arbitration_command;
- *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | 1 << 8 | 1;
- *batch++ = lower_32_bits(vma->node.start);
- *batch++ = upper_32_bits(vma->node.start);
+ if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) {
+ *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | 1 << 8 | 1;
+ *batch++ = lower_32_bits(vma->node.start);
+ *batch++ = upper_32_bits(vma->node.start);
+ } else {
+ *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_GTT;
+ *batch++ = vma->node.start;
+ }
+
*batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END; /* not reached */
intel_gt_chipset_flush(engine->gt);
--
2.24.0.rc2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3)
2019-10-31 23:29 [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously Chris Wilson
2019-10-31 23:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
@ 2019-11-01 0:00 ` Patchwork
2019-11-01 0:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-11-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68836/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7234 -> Patchwork_15096
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15096 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_15096, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15096:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_requests:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-byt-n2820: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-ivb-3770: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-FAIL][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-FAIL][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-elk-e7500: [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-FAIL][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-elk-e7500/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-elk-e7500/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-ilk-650: [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-FAIL][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-ilk-650/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-ilk-650/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15096 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
- fi-icl-u3: [PASS][15] -> [INCOMPLETE][16] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#109100])
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
* igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render:
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][17] -> [INCOMPLETE][18] ([fdo#103927])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-skl-6600u: [PASS][19] -> [INCOMPLETE][20] ([fdo#107807])
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-skl-6600u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-skl-6600u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_busy@busy-all:
- fi-icl-u3: [DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][22]
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_busy@busy-all.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_busy@busy-all.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
[fdo#107807]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107807
[fdo#109100]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109100
Participating hosts (52 -> 45)
------------------------------
Missing (7): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7234 -> Patchwork_15096
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7234: 4163f8c46b6ef75ea32737f08aa3f5fd429a4462 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5255: b21b6a7aaa0db2159f22ee4427804e5a16fe2261 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_15096: 0a1f236b06bec3f47e919530ddab5e554248a71e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
0a1f236b06be drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3)
2019-11-01 0:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3) Patchwork
@ 2019-11-01 0:00 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-11-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68836/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7234 -> Patchwork_15096
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15096 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_15096, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15096:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_requests:
- fi-hsw-peppy: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-byt-n2820: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-byt-n2820/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-ivb-3770: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-ivb-3770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-FAIL][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-hsw-4770/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-byt-j1900: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-FAIL][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-elk-e7500: [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-FAIL][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-elk-e7500/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-elk-e7500/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
- fi-ilk-650: [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-FAIL][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-ilk-650/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-ilk-650/igt@i915_selftest@live_requests.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15096 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
- fi-icl-u3: [PASS][15] -> [INCOMPLETE][16] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#109100])
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
* igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render:
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][17] -> [INCOMPLETE][18] ([fdo#103927])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-skl-6600u: [PASS][19] -> [INCOMPLETE][20] ([fdo#107807])
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-skl-6600u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-skl-6600u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_busy@busy-all:
- fi-icl-u3: [DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][22]
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7234/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_busy@busy-all.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_busy@busy-all.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
[fdo#107807]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107807
[fdo#109100]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109100
Participating hosts (52 -> 45)
------------------------------
Missing (7): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7234 -> Patchwork_15096
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7234: 4163f8c46b6ef75ea32737f08aa3f5fd429a4462 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5255: b21b6a7aaa0db2159f22ee4427804e5a16fe2261 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_15096: 0a1f236b06bec3f47e919530ddab5e554248a71e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
0a1f236b06be drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15096/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-31 23:29 [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously Chris Wilson
2019-10-31 23:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-01 0:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Spin on all engines simultaneously (rev3) Patchwork
2019-11-01 0:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox