From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gem: Distinguish each object type
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:51:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104175135.GN10326@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM0jSHPom-2SKVrOZ4FCvu8D6upmjTF_dHudkS0gYsLt4fhKTQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:30:13PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 09:03, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Separate each object class into a separate lock type to avoid lockdep
> > cross-contamination between paths (i.e. userptr!).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
> As per the explanation you gave on IRC, makes sense.
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
It would be really lovely if such explanations would make it from
ephemeral irc onto something more permanent like mailing lists, or even
better, commit messages :-)
So, why do we need this?
I'm wondering since aside from userptr we'll have to unify how locking for
bo works longer term (with all the dma_buf/ww_mutex stuff going on), not
make it more distinct.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gem: Distinguish each object type
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:51:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104175135.GN10326@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191104175135.UXijfewvcqT6eJPY5_jF2M-PrbSRs9r55jmYemAqcX8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM0jSHPom-2SKVrOZ4FCvu8D6upmjTF_dHudkS0gYsLt4fhKTQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:30:13PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 09:03, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Separate each object class into a separate lock type to avoid lockdep
> > cross-contamination between paths (i.e. userptr!).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
> As per the explanation you gave on IRC, makes sense.
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
It would be really lovely if such explanations would make it from
ephemeral irc onto something more permanent like mailing lists, or even
better, commit messages :-)
So, why do we need this?
I'm wondering since aside from userptr we'll have to unify how locking for
bo works longer term (with all the dma_buf/ww_mutex stuff going on), not
make it more distinct.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 8:02 [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915: Don't set queue_priority_hint if we don't kick the submission Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915: Drop assertion that ce->pin_mutex guards state updates Chris Wilson
2019-10-22 12:25 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/selftests: Add coverage of mocs registers Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/selftests: Teach igt_flush_test and igt_live_test to take intel_gt Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/selftests: Force ordering of context switches Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Expose engine properties via sysfs Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Expose engine->mmio_base " Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915: Expose timeslice duration to sysfs Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/execlists: Force preemption Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/gt: Introduce barrier pulses along engines Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/execlists: Cancel banned contexts on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/gem: Cancel contexts when hangchecking is disabled Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/gem: Make context persistence optional Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gem: Distinguish each object type Chris Wilson
2019-10-22 14:30 ` Matthew Auld
2019-11-04 17:51 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-11-04 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-10-21 8:02 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Flush idle barriers when waiting Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 8:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/16] drm/i915: Don't set queue_priority_hint if we don't kick the submission Patchwork
2019-10-21 9:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-10-21 9:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-21 9:49 ` [PATCH 01/16] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-21 9:56 ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-21 10:01 ` Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191104175135.GN10326@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.william.auld@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox