From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] drm/i915: Remove skl_ddl_allocation struct
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:13:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128161357.GU1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127144128.3195-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:41:25PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Current consensus that it is redundant as
> we already have skl_ddb_values struct out there,
> also this struct contains only single member
> which makes it unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 +++++-----
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 +++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 53dc310a5f6d..530832067113 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -13393,10 +13393,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct skl_hw_state {
> struct skl_ddb_entry ddb_y[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> struct skl_ddb_entry ddb_uv[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
> + struct skl_ddb_values ddb;
> } *hw;
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *sw_ddb;
> + struct skl_ddb_values *sw_ddb;
> struct skl_pipe_wm *sw_wm;
> struct skl_ddb_entry *hw_ddb_entry, *sw_ddb_entry;
> const enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> @@ -13415,7 +13415,7 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(crtc, hw->ddb_y, hw->ddb_uv);
>
> skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, &hw->ddb);
> - sw_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> + sw_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 &&
> hw->ddb.enabled_slices != sw_ddb->enabled_slices)
> @@ -14647,8 +14647,8 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> unsigned int updated = 0;
> bool progress;
> int i;
> - u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices;
> - u8 required_slices = state->wm_results.ddb.enabled_slices;
> + u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices;
> + u8 required_slices = state->wm_results.enabled_slices;
> struct skl_ddb_entry entries[I915_MAX_PIPES] = {};
>
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index ce1b64f4dd44..75198da13479 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -4264,7 +4264,7 @@ static u8 intel_dbuf_max_slices(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u8 req_slices)
> {
> - const u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices;
> + const u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices;
> bool ret;
>
> if (req_slices > intel_dbuf_max_slices(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -4281,7 +4281,7 @@ void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> ret = intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL_S2, false);
>
> if (ret)
> - dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = req_slices;
> + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices = req_slices;
> }
>
> static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -4300,7 +4300,7 @@ static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * FIXME: for now pretend that we only have 1 slice, see
> * intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num().
> */
> - dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 1;
> + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices = 1;
> }
>
> static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -4319,7 +4319,7 @@ static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * FIXME: for now pretend that the first slice is always
> * enabled, see intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num().
> */
> - dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 1;
> + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices = 1;
> }
>
> static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index fdae5a919bc8..6457f8e557a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -798,13 +798,9 @@ static inline bool skl_ddb_entry_equal(const struct skl_ddb_entry *e1,
> return false;
> }
>
> -struct skl_ddb_allocation {
> - u8 enabled_slices; /* GEN11 has configurable 2 slices */
> -};
> -
> struct skl_ddb_values {
> unsigned dirty_pipes;
Didn't I already nuke this dirty_pipes crap?
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
> + u8 enabled_slices; /* GEN11 has configurable 2 slices */
> };
>
> struct skl_wm_level {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 5aad9d49a528..3857ec3d2bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3823,7 +3823,7 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const u64 total_data_rate,
> const int num_active,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb)
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb)
> {
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode;
> u64 total_data_bw;
> @@ -3859,7 +3859,7 @@ static void
> skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const u64 total_data_rate,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb,
> struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */
> int *num_active /* out */)
> {
> @@ -4047,7 +4047,7 @@ void skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> }
>
> void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb /* out */)
> {
> ddb->enabled_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num(dev_priv);
> }
> @@ -4227,7 +4227,7 @@ icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>
> static int
> skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb /* out */)
> {
> struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> struct drm_crtc *crtc = crtc_state->uapi.crtc;
> @@ -5184,13 +5184,13 @@ static int
> skl_compute_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &state->wm_results.ddb;
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb = &state->wm_results;
> struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> int ret, i;
>
> - memcpy(ddb, &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb, sizeof(*ddb));
> + memcpy(ddb, &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw, sizeof(*ddb));
>
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state, i) {
> @@ -5666,11 +5666,10 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> struct skl_ddb_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>
> - skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, ddb);
> + skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, hw);
> for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
> crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> index b579c724b915..1d03732ff22e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
> struct intel_plane;
> -struct skl_ddb_allocation;
> struct skl_ddb_entry;
> +struct skl_ddb_values;
> struct skl_pipe_wm;
> struct skl_wm_level;
>
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb_y,
> struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb_uv);
> void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */);
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb /* out */);
> void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct skl_pipe_wm *out);
> void g4x_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/4] drm/i915: Remove skl_ddl_allocation struct
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:13:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128161357.GU1208@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191128161357.2AC-CvBKTZYVESA52e2RG_4VkaE86XfrX1Kb6SlpGok@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127144128.3195-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:41:25PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Current consensus that it is redundant as
> we already have skl_ddb_values struct out there,
> also this struct contains only single member
> which makes it unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 +++++-----
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 +++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 53dc310a5f6d..530832067113 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -13393,10 +13393,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct skl_hw_state {
> struct skl_ddb_entry ddb_y[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> struct skl_ddb_entry ddb_uv[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
> + struct skl_ddb_values ddb;
> } *hw;
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *sw_ddb;
> + struct skl_ddb_values *sw_ddb;
> struct skl_pipe_wm *sw_wm;
> struct skl_ddb_entry *hw_ddb_entry, *sw_ddb_entry;
> const enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> @@ -13415,7 +13415,7 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(crtc, hw->ddb_y, hw->ddb_uv);
>
> skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, &hw->ddb);
> - sw_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> + sw_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 &&
> hw->ddb.enabled_slices != sw_ddb->enabled_slices)
> @@ -14647,8 +14647,8 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> unsigned int updated = 0;
> bool progress;
> int i;
> - u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices;
> - u8 required_slices = state->wm_results.ddb.enabled_slices;
> + u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices;
> + u8 required_slices = state->wm_results.enabled_slices;
> struct skl_ddb_entry entries[I915_MAX_PIPES] = {};
>
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index ce1b64f4dd44..75198da13479 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -4264,7 +4264,7 @@ static u8 intel_dbuf_max_slices(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u8 req_slices)
> {
> - const u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices;
> + const u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices;
> bool ret;
>
> if (req_slices > intel_dbuf_max_slices(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -4281,7 +4281,7 @@ void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> ret = intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL_S2, false);
>
> if (ret)
> - dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = req_slices;
> + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices = req_slices;
> }
>
> static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -4300,7 +4300,7 @@ static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * FIXME: for now pretend that we only have 1 slice, see
> * intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num().
> */
> - dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 1;
> + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices = 1;
> }
>
> static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -4319,7 +4319,7 @@ static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> * FIXME: for now pretend that the first slice is always
> * enabled, see intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num().
> */
> - dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 1;
> + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.enabled_slices = 1;
> }
>
> static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index fdae5a919bc8..6457f8e557a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -798,13 +798,9 @@ static inline bool skl_ddb_entry_equal(const struct skl_ddb_entry *e1,
> return false;
> }
>
> -struct skl_ddb_allocation {
> - u8 enabled_slices; /* GEN11 has configurable 2 slices */
> -};
> -
> struct skl_ddb_values {
> unsigned dirty_pipes;
Didn't I already nuke this dirty_pipes crap?
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
> + u8 enabled_slices; /* GEN11 has configurable 2 slices */
> };
>
> struct skl_wm_level {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 5aad9d49a528..3857ec3d2bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3823,7 +3823,7 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const u64 total_data_rate,
> const int num_active,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb)
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb)
> {
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode;
> u64 total_data_bw;
> @@ -3859,7 +3859,7 @@ static void
> skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const u64 total_data_rate,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb,
> struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */
> int *num_active /* out */)
> {
> @@ -4047,7 +4047,7 @@ void skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> }
>
> void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb /* out */)
> {
> ddb->enabled_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num(dev_priv);
> }
> @@ -4227,7 +4227,7 @@ icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>
> static int
> skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */)
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb /* out */)
> {
> struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> struct drm_crtc *crtc = crtc_state->uapi.crtc;
> @@ -5184,13 +5184,13 @@ static int
> skl_compute_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &state->wm_results.ddb;
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb = &state->wm_results;
> struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> int ret, i;
>
> - memcpy(ddb, &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb, sizeof(*ddb));
> + memcpy(ddb, &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw, sizeof(*ddb));
>
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state, i) {
> @@ -5666,11 +5666,10 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> struct skl_ddb_values *hw = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw;
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>
> - skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, ddb);
> + skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, hw);
> for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
> crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> index b579c724b915..1d03732ff22e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
> struct intel_plane;
> -struct skl_ddb_allocation;
> struct skl_ddb_entry;
> +struct skl_ddb_values;
> struct skl_pipe_wm;
> struct skl_wm_level;
>
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb_y,
> struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb_uv);
> void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */);
> + struct skl_ddb_values *ddb /* out */);
> void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct skl_pipe_wm *out);
> void g4x_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-28 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-27 14:41 [PATCH v6 0/4] Enable second DBuf slice for ICL and TGL Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] drm/i915: Remove skl_ddl_allocation struct Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-28 16:13 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-11-28 16:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-28 17:39 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-11-28 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2019-11-28 18:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-28 18:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] drm/i915: Move dbuf slice update to proper place Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] drm/i915: Manipulate DBuf slices properly Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] drm/i915: Correctly map DBUF slices to pipes Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2019-11-27 19:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Enable second DBuf slice for ICL and TGL (rev2) Patchwork
2019-11-27 19:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-27 19:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-27 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-29 0:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-29 0:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191128161357.GU1208@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox