From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp/tgl+: Update combo phy vswing tables
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:18:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191203131852.GQ1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203023110.488972-2-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:31:10PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> TGL has now a table for RBR and HBR and another table for HBR2 over
> combo phys. The HBR2 one has some small changes comparing to the ICL
> one, so adding two new tables and adding a function to return TGL
> combo phy tables.
>
> BSpec: 49291
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 914f0cc4d237..facf3dfa2a41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -625,6 +625,34 @@ static const struct tgl_dkl_phy_ddi_buf_trans tgl_dkl_phy_hdmi_ddi_trans[] = {
> { 0x0, 0x0, 0xA }, /* 10 Full -3 dB */
> };
>
> +static const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr2[] = {
> + /* NT mV Trans mV db */
> + { 0xA, 0x35, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 350 350 0.0 */
> + { 0xA, 0x4F, 0x37, 0x00, 0x08 }, /* 350 500 3.1 */
> + { 0xC, 0x63, 0x2F, 0x00, 0x10 }, /* 350 700 6.0 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x2B, 0x00, 0x14 }, /* 350 900 8.2 */
> + { 0xA, 0x47, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 500 500 0.0 */
> + { 0xC, 0x63, 0x34, 0x00, 0x0B }, /* 500 700 2.9 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x2F, 0x00, 0x10 }, /* 500 900 5.1 */
> + { 0xC, 0x61, 0x3C, 0x00, 0x03 }, /* 650 700 0.6 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7B, 0x35, 0x00, 0x0A }, /* 600 900 3.5 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 900 900 0.0 */
> +};
> +
> +static const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr[] = {
> + /* NT mV Trans mV db */
> + { 0xA, 0x32, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 350 350 0.0 */
> + { 0xA, 0x4F, 0x37, 0x00, 0x08 }, /* 350 500 3.1 */
> + { 0xC, 0x71, 0x2F, 0x00, 0x10 }, /* 350 700 6.0 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7D, 0x2B, 0x00, 0x14 }, /* 350 900 8.2 */
> + { 0xA, 0x4C, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 500 500 0.0 */
> + { 0xC, 0x73, 0x34, 0x00, 0x0B }, /* 500 700 2.9 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x2F, 0x00, 0x10 }, /* 500 900 5.1 */
> + { 0xC, 0x6C, 0x3C, 0x00, 0x03 }, /* 650 700 0.6 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x35, 0x00, 0x0A }, /* 600 900 3.5 */
> + { 0x6, 0x7F, 0x3F, 0x00, 0x00 }, /* 900 900 0.0 */
> +};
> +
> static const struct ddi_buf_trans *
> bdw_get_buf_trans_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int *n_entries)
> {
> @@ -904,6 +932,32 @@ icl_get_combo_buf_trans(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int type, int rate,
> return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr2;
> }
>
> +static const struct cnl_ddi_buf_trans *
> +tgl_get_combo_buf_trans(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int type, int rate,
> + int *n_entries)
> +{
> + if (type == INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI) {
> + *n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_hdmi);
> + return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_hdmi;
> + } else if (type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
> + if (rate > HBR2_RATE) {
> + *n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr3);
> + return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr3;
> + } else if (dev_priv->vbt.edp.low_vswing) {
> + *n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2);
> + return icl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_edp_hbr2;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (rate > HBR_RATE) {
> + *n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr2);
> + return tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr2;
> + }
ICL uses just a single if-else ladder. IMO should do the same here for
consistency.
> +
> + *n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr);
> + return tgl_combo_phy_ddi_translations_dp_hbr;
> +}
> +
> static int intel_ddi_hdmi_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
> {
> struct ddi_vbt_port_info *port_info = &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[port];
> @@ -912,7 +966,7 @@ static int intel_ddi_hdmi_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port por
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy))
> - icl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI,
> + tgl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI,
> 0, &n_entries);
> else
> n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_dkl_phy_hdmi_ddi_trans);
> @@ -2373,7 +2427,7 @@ u8 intel_ddi_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy))
> - icl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, encoder->type,
> + tgl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, encoder->type,
> intel_dp->link_rate, &n_entries);
> else
> n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_dkl_phy_dp_ddi_trans);
> @@ -2568,8 +2622,12 @@ static void icl_ddi_combo_vswing_program(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u32 n_entries, val;
> int ln;
>
> - ddi_translations = icl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, type, rate,
> - &n_entries);
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> + ddi_translations = tgl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, type, rate,
> + &n_entries);
> + else
> + ddi_translations = icl_get_combo_buf_trans(dev_priv, type, rate,
> + &n_entries);
> if (!ddi_translations)
> return;
>
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 2:31 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Define each HBR link rate José Roberto de Souza
2019-12-03 2:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-12-03 2:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp/tgl+: Update combo phy vswing tables José Roberto de Souza
2019-12-03 2:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-12-03 13:18 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-12-03 16:35 ` Matt Roper
2019-12-03 3:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Define each HBR link rate Patchwork
2019-12-03 3:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-12-03 9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Jani Nikula
2019-12-03 13:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-03 21:48 ` Souza, Jose
2019-12-03 22:01 ` Manasi Navare
2019-12-03 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2019-12-03 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191203131852.GQ1208@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox