From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/3] drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:36:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200316233613.GA24231@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316113744.31203-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> We need to calculate cdclk after watermarks/ddb has been calculated
> as with recent hw CDCLK needs to be adjusted accordingly to DBuf
> requirements, which is not possible with current code organization.
>
> Setting CDCLK according to DBuf BW requirements and not just rejecting
> if it doesn't satisfy BW requirements, will allow us to save power when
> it is possible and gain additional bandwidth when it's needed - i.e
> boosting both our power management and perfomance capabilities.
>
> This patch is preparation for that, first we now extract modeset
> calculation from modeset checks, in order to call it after wm/ddb
Did you mean to type extract cdclk calculation from modeset checks?
Manasi
> has been calculated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 8f23c4d51c33..cdff3054b344 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14542,6 +14542,14 @@ static int intel_modeset_checks(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_modeset_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> ret = intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(state);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -14879,10 +14887,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - ret = intel_atomic_check_crtcs(state);
> - if (ret)
> - goto fail;
> -
> intel_fbc_choose_crtc(dev_priv, state);
> ret = calc_watermark_data(state);
> if (ret)
> @@ -14892,6 +14896,16 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (ret)
> goto fail;
>
> + if (any_ms) {
> + ret = intel_modeset_cdclk(state);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail;
> + }
> +
> + ret = intel_atomic_check_crtcs(state);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail;
> +
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state, i) {
> if (!needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) &&
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-16 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-16 11:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 0/3] Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-16 11:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/3] drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-16 23:36 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2020-03-17 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-16 11:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 2/3] drm/i915: Adjust CDCLK accordingly to our DBuf bw needs Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-16 22:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-17 13:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-17 14:40 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-16 11:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 3/3] drm/i915: Remove unneeded hack now for CDCLK Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-16 23:51 ` Manasi Navare
2020-03-16 20:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK Patchwork
2020-03-16 20:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-03-17 0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev2) Patchwork
2020-03-17 10:43 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-18 8:33 ` Arkadiusz Hiler
2020-03-18 8:43 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-18 8:55 ` Arkadiusz Hiler
2020-03-18 9:00 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-17 0:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-17 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200316233613.GA24231@intel.com \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox