From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/15] pwm: lpss: Fix off by one error in base_unit math in pwm_lpss_prepare()
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:18:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200607181840.13536-5-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200607181840.13536-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
According to the data-sheet the way the PWM controller works is that
each input clock-cycle the base_unit gets added to a N bit counter and
that counter overflowing determines the PWM output frequency.
So assuming e.g. a 16 bit counter this means that if base_unit is set to 1,
after 65535 input clock-cycles the counter has been increased from 0 to
65535 and it will overflow on the next cycle, so it will overflow after
every 65536 clock cycles and thus the calculations done in
pwm_lpss_prepare() should use 65536 and not 65535.
This commit fixes this. Note this also aligns the calculations in
pwm_lpss_prepare() with those in pwm_lpss_get_state().
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
index cae74ce61654..a764e062103b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* The equation is:
* base_unit = round(base_unit_range * freq / c)
*/
- base_unit_range = BIT(lpwm->info->base_unit_bits) - 1;
+ base_unit_range = BIT(lpwm->info->base_unit_bits);
freq *= base_unit_range;
base_unit = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(freq, c);
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void pwm_lpss_prepare(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm, struct pwm_device *pwm,
orig_ctrl = ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm);
ctrl &= ~PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK;
- ctrl &= ~(base_unit_range << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
+ ctrl &= ~((base_unit_range - 1) << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT);
ctrl |= (u32) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT;
ctrl |= on_time_div;
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-07 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-07 18:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/15] ACPI / LPSS: Resume Cherry Trail PWM controller in no-irq phase Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/15] ACPI / LPSS: Save Cherry Trail PWM ctx registers only once (at activation) Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/15] pwm: lpss: Add range limit check for the base_unit register value Hans de Goede
2020-06-08 3:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 11:07 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-08 12:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 14:19 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-11 22:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-12 11:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-13 20:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-07 18:18 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-06-08 3:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/15] pwm: lpss: Fix off by one error in base_unit math in pwm_lpss_prepare() Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 11:13 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-08 12:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/15] pwm: lpss: Set SW_UPDATE bit when enabling the PWM Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/15] pwm: crc: Fix period / duty_cycle times being off by a factor of 256 Hans de Goede
2020-06-09 11:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 13:45 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/15] pwm: crc: Fix off-by-one error in the clock-divider calculations Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/15] pwm: crc: Fix period changes not having any effect Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/15] pwm: crc: Enable/disable PWM output on enable/disable Hans de Goede
2020-06-09 11:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-11 22:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-12 16:59 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/15] pwm: crc: Implement apply() method to support the new atomic PWM API Hans de Goede
2020-06-09 11:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 13:44 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-09 13:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method Hans de Goede
2020-06-09 11:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-11 21:37 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-12 17:00 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/i915: panel: Add get_vbt_pwm_freq() helper Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM controller Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM min setting " Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/15] drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API " Hans de Goede
2020-06-07 18:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API Patchwork
2020-06-07 18:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-06-07 19:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200607181840.13536-5-hdegoede@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox