From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/28] drm/i915/selftests: Remove live_suppress_wait_preempt
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 23:20:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200607222108.14401-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200607222108.14401-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With the removal of the internal wait-priority boosting, we can also
remove the selftest to ensure that those waits were being suppressed
from causing preemptions.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 178 -------------------------
1 file changed, 178 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 67d74e6432a8..e838e38a262c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -2379,183 +2379,6 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
goto err_client_b;
}
-static int __i915_sw_fence_call
-dummy_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
-{
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
-}
-
-static struct i915_request *dummy_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
-{
- struct i915_request *rq;
-
- rq = kzalloc(sizeof(*rq), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rq)
- return NULL;
-
- rq->engine = engine;
-
- spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->fence.cb_list);
- rq->fence.lock = &rq->lock;
- rq->fence.ops = &i915_fence_ops;
-
- i915_sched_node_init(&rq->sched);
-
- /* mark this request as permanently incomplete */
- rq->fence.seqno = 1;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rq->fence.seqno) != 8); /* upper 32b == 0 */
- rq->hwsp_seqno = (u32 *)&rq->fence.seqno + 1;
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq));
-
- i915_sw_fence_init(&rq->submit, dummy_notify);
- set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags);
-
- spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
- rq->fence.lock = &rq->lock;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->fence.cb_list);
-
- return rq;
-}
-
-static void dummy_request_free(struct i915_request *dummy)
-{
- /* We have to fake the CS interrupt to kick the next request */
- i915_sw_fence_commit(&dummy->submit);
-
- i915_request_mark_complete(dummy);
- dma_fence_signal(&dummy->fence);
-
- i915_sched_node_fini(&dummy->sched);
- i915_sw_fence_fini(&dummy->submit);
-
- dma_fence_free(&dummy->fence);
-}
-
-static int live_suppress_wait_preempt(void *arg)
-{
- struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
- struct preempt_client client[4];
- struct i915_request *rq[ARRAY_SIZE(client)] = {};
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
- enum intel_engine_id id;
- int err = -ENOMEM;
- int i;
-
- /*
- * Waiters are given a little priority nudge, but not enough
- * to actually cause any preemption. Double check that we do
- * not needlessly generate preempt-to-idle cycles.
- */
-
- if (!HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(gt->i915))
- return 0;
-
- if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[0])) /* ELSP[0] */
- return -ENOMEM;
- if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[1])) /* ELSP[1] */
- goto err_client_0;
- if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[2])) /* head of queue */
- goto err_client_1;
- if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[3])) /* bystander */
- goto err_client_2;
-
- for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
- int depth;
-
- if (!intel_engine_has_preemption(engine))
- continue;
-
- if (!engine->emit_init_breadcrumb)
- continue;
-
- for (depth = 0; depth < ARRAY_SIZE(client); depth++) {
- struct i915_request *dummy;
-
- engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count = 0;
-
- dummy = dummy_request(engine);
- if (!dummy)
- goto err_client_3;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(client); i++) {
- struct i915_request *this;
-
- this = spinner_create_request(&client[i].spin,
- client[i].ctx, engine,
- MI_NOOP);
- if (IS_ERR(this)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(this);
- goto err_wedged;
- }
-
- /* Disable NEWCLIENT promotion */
- __i915_active_fence_set(&i915_request_timeline(this)->last_request,
- &dummy->fence);
-
- rq[i] = i915_request_get(this);
- i915_request_add(this);
- }
-
- dummy_request_free(dummy);
-
- GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq[0]));
- if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&client[0].spin, rq[0])) {
- pr_err("%s: First client failed to start\n",
- engine->name);
- goto err_wedged;
- }
- GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_started(rq[0]));
-
- if (i915_request_wait(rq[depth],
- I915_WAIT_PRIORITY,
- 1) != -ETIME) {
- pr_err("%s: Waiter depth:%d completed!\n",
- engine->name, depth);
- goto err_wedged;
- }
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(client); i++) {
- igt_spinner_end(&client[i].spin);
- i915_request_put(rq[i]);
- rq[i] = NULL;
- }
-
- if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915))
- goto err_wedged;
-
- if (engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count) {
- pr_err("%s: Preemption recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n",
- engine->name,
- engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count,
- depth);
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto err_client_3;
- }
- }
- }
-
- err = 0;
-err_client_3:
- preempt_client_fini(&client[3]);
-err_client_2:
- preempt_client_fini(&client[2]);
-err_client_1:
- preempt_client_fini(&client[1]);
-err_client_0:
- preempt_client_fini(&client[0]);
- return err;
-
-err_wedged:
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(client); i++) {
- igt_spinner_end(&client[i].spin);
- i915_request_put(rq[i]);
- }
- intel_gt_set_wedged(gt);
- err = -EIO;
- goto err_client_3;
-}
-
static int live_chain_preempt(void *arg)
{
struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
@@ -4592,7 +4415,6 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
SUBTEST(live_nopreempt),
SUBTEST(live_preempt_cancel),
SUBTEST(live_suppress_self_preempt),
- SUBTEST(live_suppress_wait_preempt),
SUBTEST(live_chain_preempt),
SUBTEST(live_preempt_gang),
SUBTEST(live_preempt_timeout),
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-07 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-07 22:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/28] drm/i915: Adjust the sentinel assert to match implementation Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/28] drm/i915/selftests: Make the hanging request non-preemptible Chris Wilson
2020-06-08 20:58 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/28] drm/i915/selftests: Teach hang-self to target only itself Chris Wilson
2020-06-10 13:21 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-07 22:20 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-06-11 11:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/28] drm/i915/selftests: Remove live_suppress_wait_preempt Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/28] drm/i915/selftests: Trim execlists runtime Chris Wilson
2020-06-12 23:05 ` Andi Shyti
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/28] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/28] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/28] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/28] drm/i915: Add list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/28] drm/i915/gem: Separate reloc validation into an earlier step Chris Wilson
2020-06-09 7:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-09 10:48 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/28] drm/i915/gem: Lift GPU relocation allocation Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/28] drm/i915/gem: Build the reloc request first Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/28] drm/i915/gem: Add all GPU reloc awaits/signals en masse Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/28] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/28] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/28] drm/i915: Unpeel awaits on a proxy fence Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/28] drm/i915/gem: Make relocations atomic within execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/28] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/28] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/28] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/28] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/28] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/28] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/28] ipi-dag Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/28] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/28] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-06-16 9:07 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-16 10:12 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-16 12:11 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-16 12:44 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-16 10:54 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/28] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/28] drm/i915: Adjust the sentinel assert to match implementation Patchwork
2020-06-07 22:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-07 23:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-06-08 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-06-08 7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/28] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-08 9:33 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-09 6:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-09 10:29 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-09 10:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-09 10:47 ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-09 11:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-08 20:43 ` Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200607222108.14401-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox