Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/28] drm/i915/selftests: Remove live_suppress_wait_preempt
Date: Sun,  7 Jun 2020 23:20:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200607222108.14401-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200607222108.14401-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

With the removal of the internal wait-priority boosting, we can also
remove the selftest to ensure that those waits were being suppressed
from causing preemptions.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 178 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 178 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 67d74e6432a8..e838e38a262c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -2379,183 +2379,6 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
 	goto err_client_b;
 }
 
-static int __i915_sw_fence_call
-dummy_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum i915_sw_fence_notify state)
-{
-	return NOTIFY_DONE;
-}
-
-static struct i915_request *dummy_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
-{
-	struct i915_request *rq;
-
-	rq = kzalloc(sizeof(*rq), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!rq)
-		return NULL;
-
-	rq->engine = engine;
-
-	spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->fence.cb_list);
-	rq->fence.lock = &rq->lock;
-	rq->fence.ops = &i915_fence_ops;
-
-	i915_sched_node_init(&rq->sched);
-
-	/* mark this request as permanently incomplete */
-	rq->fence.seqno = 1;
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rq->fence.seqno) != 8); /* upper 32b == 0 */
-	rq->hwsp_seqno = (u32 *)&rq->fence.seqno + 1;
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq));
-
-	i915_sw_fence_init(&rq->submit, dummy_notify);
-	set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags);
-
-	spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
-	rq->fence.lock = &rq->lock;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->fence.cb_list);
-
-	return rq;
-}
-
-static void dummy_request_free(struct i915_request *dummy)
-{
-	/* We have to fake the CS interrupt to kick the next request */
-	i915_sw_fence_commit(&dummy->submit);
-
-	i915_request_mark_complete(dummy);
-	dma_fence_signal(&dummy->fence);
-
-	i915_sched_node_fini(&dummy->sched);
-	i915_sw_fence_fini(&dummy->submit);
-
-	dma_fence_free(&dummy->fence);
-}
-
-static int live_suppress_wait_preempt(void *arg)
-{
-	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
-	struct preempt_client client[4];
-	struct i915_request *rq[ARRAY_SIZE(client)] = {};
-	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
-	enum intel_engine_id id;
-	int err = -ENOMEM;
-	int i;
-
-	/*
-	 * Waiters are given a little priority nudge, but not enough
-	 * to actually cause any preemption. Double check that we do
-	 * not needlessly generate preempt-to-idle cycles.
-	 */
-
-	if (!HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(gt->i915))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[0])) /* ELSP[0] */
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[1])) /* ELSP[1] */
-		goto err_client_0;
-	if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[2])) /* head of queue */
-		goto err_client_1;
-	if (preempt_client_init(gt, &client[3])) /* bystander */
-		goto err_client_2;
-
-	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
-		int depth;
-
-		if (!intel_engine_has_preemption(engine))
-			continue;
-
-		if (!engine->emit_init_breadcrumb)
-			continue;
-
-		for (depth = 0; depth < ARRAY_SIZE(client); depth++) {
-			struct i915_request *dummy;
-
-			engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count = 0;
-
-			dummy = dummy_request(engine);
-			if (!dummy)
-				goto err_client_3;
-
-			for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(client); i++) {
-				struct i915_request *this;
-
-				this = spinner_create_request(&client[i].spin,
-							      client[i].ctx, engine,
-							      MI_NOOP);
-				if (IS_ERR(this)) {
-					err = PTR_ERR(this);
-					goto err_wedged;
-				}
-
-				/* Disable NEWCLIENT promotion */
-				__i915_active_fence_set(&i915_request_timeline(this)->last_request,
-							&dummy->fence);
-
-				rq[i] = i915_request_get(this);
-				i915_request_add(this);
-			}
-
-			dummy_request_free(dummy);
-
-			GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq[0]));
-			if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&client[0].spin, rq[0])) {
-				pr_err("%s: First client failed to start\n",
-				       engine->name);
-				goto err_wedged;
-			}
-			GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_started(rq[0]));
-
-			if (i915_request_wait(rq[depth],
-					      I915_WAIT_PRIORITY,
-					      1) != -ETIME) {
-				pr_err("%s: Waiter depth:%d completed!\n",
-				       engine->name, depth);
-				goto err_wedged;
-			}
-
-			for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(client); i++) {
-				igt_spinner_end(&client[i].spin);
-				i915_request_put(rq[i]);
-				rq[i] = NULL;
-			}
-
-			if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915))
-				goto err_wedged;
-
-			if (engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count) {
-				pr_err("%s: Preemption recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n",
-				       engine->name,
-				       engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count,
-				       depth);
-				err = -EINVAL;
-				goto err_client_3;
-			}
-		}
-	}
-
-	err = 0;
-err_client_3:
-	preempt_client_fini(&client[3]);
-err_client_2:
-	preempt_client_fini(&client[2]);
-err_client_1:
-	preempt_client_fini(&client[1]);
-err_client_0:
-	preempt_client_fini(&client[0]);
-	return err;
-
-err_wedged:
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(client); i++) {
-		igt_spinner_end(&client[i].spin);
-		i915_request_put(rq[i]);
-	}
-	intel_gt_set_wedged(gt);
-	err = -EIO;
-	goto err_client_3;
-}
-
 static int live_chain_preempt(void *arg)
 {
 	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
@@ -4592,7 +4415,6 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 		SUBTEST(live_nopreempt),
 		SUBTEST(live_preempt_cancel),
 		SUBTEST(live_suppress_self_preempt),
-		SUBTEST(live_suppress_wait_preempt),
 		SUBTEST(live_chain_preempt),
 		SUBTEST(live_preempt_gang),
 		SUBTEST(live_preempt_timeout),
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-07 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-07 22:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/28] drm/i915: Adjust the sentinel assert to match implementation Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/28] drm/i915/selftests: Make the hanging request non-preemptible Chris Wilson
2020-06-08 20:58   ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/28] drm/i915/selftests: Teach hang-self to target only itself Chris Wilson
2020-06-10 13:21   ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-06-07 22:20 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-06-11 11:38   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/28] drm/i915/selftests: Remove live_suppress_wait_preempt Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/28] drm/i915/selftests: Trim execlists runtime Chris Wilson
2020-06-12 23:05   ` Andi Shyti
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/28] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/28] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/28] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/28] drm/i915: Add list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/28] drm/i915/gem: Separate reloc validation into an earlier step Chris Wilson
2020-06-09  7:47   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-09 10:48     ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/28] drm/i915/gem: Lift GPU relocation allocation Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/28] drm/i915/gem: Build the reloc request first Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/28] drm/i915/gem: Add all GPU reloc awaits/signals en masse Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/28] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/28] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/28] drm/i915: Unpeel awaits on a proxy fence Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/28] drm/i915/gem: Make relocations atomic within execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/28] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/28] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/28] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/28] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/28] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/28] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/28] ipi-dag Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/28] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/28] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-06-16  9:07   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-16 10:12     ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-16 12:11       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-06-16 12:44         ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-16 10:54     ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/28] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/28] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2020-06-07 22:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/28] drm/i915: Adjust the sentinel assert to match implementation Patchwork
2020-06-07 22:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-07 23:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-06-08  0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-06-08  7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/28] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-08  9:33   ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-09  6:59     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-09 10:29       ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-09 10:39         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-09 10:47           ` Chris Wilson
2020-06-09 11:45             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-06-08 20:43 ` Mika Kuoppala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200607222108.14401-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox