From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Hariom Pandey <hariom.pandey@intel.com>,
Srinivas K <srinivasx.k@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Compute has_drrs after compute has_psr
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:56:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826072559.GJ25390@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825171331.17971-1-jose.souza@intel.com>
On 2020-08-25 at 10:13:29 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> DRRS and PSR can't be enable together, so giving preference to PSR
> as it allows more power-savings by complete shutting down display,
> so to guarantee this, it should compute DRRS state after compute PSR.
>
> Cc: Srinivas K <srinivasx.k@intel.com>
> Cc: Hariom Pandey <hariom.pandey@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 52 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 79c27f91f42c..a08d03c61b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2575,6 +2575,34 @@ intel_dp_compute_hdr_metadata_infoframe_sdp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(HDMI_PACKET_TYPE_GAMUT_METADATA);
> }
>
> +static void
> +intel_dp_drrs_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> + int output_bpp, bool constant_n)
> +{
> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +
> + /*
> + * DRRS and PSR can't be enable together, so giving preference to PSR
> + * as it allows more power-savings by complete shutting down display,
> + * so to guarantee this, intel_dp_drrs_compute_config() must be called
> + * after intel_psr_compute_config().
> + */
> + if (pipe_config->has_psr)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode ||
> + dev_priv->drrs.type != SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT)
> + return;
> +
> + pipe_config->has_drrs = true;
> + intel_link_compute_m_n(output_bpp, pipe_config->lane_count,
> + intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock,
> + pipe_config->port_clock, &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2,
> + constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
> +}
> +
> int
> intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> @@ -2605,7 +2633,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - pipe_config->has_drrs = false;
IMHO this assignment is required, i was thinking a case, when a crtc is attached to more than
one connector, suppose first eDP connector supports DRRS from panel.downclock_mode and
drrs.type but another DP connector won't support it in that case has_drrs will be still
true.
Please correct me if i am wrong here.
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
> if (!intel_dp_port_has_audio(dev_priv, port))
> pipe_config->has_audio = false;
> else if (intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_AUTO)
> @@ -2657,21 +2684,12 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> &pipe_config->dp_m_n,
> constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
>
> - if (intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode != NULL &&
> - dev_priv->drrs.type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
> - pipe_config->has_drrs = true;
> - intel_link_compute_m_n(output_bpp,
> - pipe_config->lane_count,
> - intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock,
> - pipe_config->port_clock,
> - &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2,
> - constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
> - }
> -
> if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> intel_dp_set_clock(encoder, pipe_config);
>
> intel_psr_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> + intel_dp_drrs_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config, output_bpp,
> + constant_n);
> intel_dp_compute_vsc_sdp(intel_dp, pipe_config, conn_state);
> intel_dp_compute_hdr_metadata_infoframe_sdp(intel_dp, pipe_config, conn_state);
>
> @@ -7730,16 +7748,10 @@ void intel_edp_drrs_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> - if (!crtc_state->has_drrs) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Panel doesn't support DRRS\n");
> + if (!crtc_state->has_drrs)
> return;
> - }
>
> - if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "PSR enabled. Not enabling DRRS.\n");
> - return;
> - }
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Enabling DRRS\n");
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drrs.mutex);
> if (dev_priv->drrs.dp) {
> --
> 2.28.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 17:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Compute has_drrs after compute has_psr José Roberto de Souza
2020-08-25 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/display: Disable DRRS when needed in fastsets José Roberto de Souza
2020-08-26 7:20 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-25 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/display: Fix DRRS debugfs José Roberto de Souza
2020-08-26 7:14 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-25 17:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v3,1/3] drm/i915/display: Compute has_drrs after compute has_psr Patchwork
2020-08-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-27 16:54 ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-26 7:26 ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2020-08-26 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] " Souza, Jose
2020-08-27 12:09 ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-27 16:51 ` Souza, Jose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200826072559.GJ25390@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=hariom.pandey@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=srinivasx.k@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).