From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:04:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908210449.1a4f8e52@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db369f50-a3a0-2504-0628-ce5e6780d31b@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1208 bytes --]
Hi Hans,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:22:06 +0200 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/8/20 6:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
This should have been
899c537c25f9 ("drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > 6b51e7d23aa8 ("drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM controller")
>
> That doesn't sound correct, those are both commits from the drm-intel tree.
>
> > from the drm-intel tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I just used the latter)
>
> Just taking the drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c contents of:
>
> f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
>
> Is the right thing to do, the problem is a difference in a line which gets
> removed in that commit.
Which is what I actually did, I guess :-)
Sorry about that.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 4:00 [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-08 8:22 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-08 11:04 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-09-08 13:20 ` Hans de Goede
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-12 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-20 0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-21 1:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-02 15:29 Mark Brown
2022-01-24 22:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-24 22:39 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-05 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-17 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-13 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14 8:19 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 10:35 ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-14 11:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-14 19:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-03-06 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200908210449.1a4f8e52@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gurus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox