Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 9/8/20 1:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:22:06 +0200 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/8/20 6:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>>     f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
> 
> This should have been
> 
>    899c537c25f9 ("drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro")

Yes that makes more sense.

>>> from Linus' tree and commit:
>>>
>>>     6b51e7d23aa8 ("drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM controller")
>>
>> That doesn't sound correct, those are both commits from the drm-intel tree.
>>
>>> from the drm-intel tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (I just used the latter)
>>
>> Just taking the drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c contents of:
>>
>> f8bd54d21904 ("drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controller")
>>
>> Is the right thing to do, the problem is a difference in a line which gets
>> removed in that commit.
> 
> Which is what I actually did, I guess :-)

Yes, looks good.

> Sorry about that.

No problem and thank you for all the work you do on -next.

Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx