From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move the lspcon resume from .reset() to intel_dp_sink_dpms()
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:51:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019155137.GI3199870@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019153434.GR6112@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:34:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:27:01PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:47:59PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Rather that try to trick LSPCON back into PCON mode from the .reset()
> > > hook let's just do that as a regular part of the normal modeset
> > > sequence, which is going to take care of the system resume case. During
> > > a normal modeset this should normally be a nop as the mode should have
> > > already been switched by .detect().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 5 ++---
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > index 52075a241eaf..4784aaeb934e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -3490,6 +3490,8 @@ void intel_dp_sink_dpms(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int mode)
> > > } else {
> > > struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = dp_to_lspcon(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > + lspcon_resume(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp));
> >
> > Only applies when lspcon->active (the check could be moved to
> > lspcon_resume).
>
> lspcon->active is mostly nonsense these days, and lspcon_resume()
> already checks it to se if it should take the resume or init path.
> I have no idea why there would be any difference between those paths
> anyway.
Ah ok, I was looking at an old version of the code, so this patch looks
ok.
> >
> > With that fixed:
> > Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * When turning on, we need to retry for 1ms to give the sink
> > > * time to wake up.
> > > @@ -6782,14 +6784,11 @@ void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->dev);
> > > struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(to_intel_encoder(encoder));
> > > - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > >
> > > if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> > > intel_dp->DP = intel_de_read(dev_priv, intel_dp->output_reg);
> > >
> > > - lspcon_resume(dig_port);
> > > -
> > > intel_dp->reset_link_params = true;
> > >
> > > if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) &&
> > > --
> > > 2.26.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-16 19:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move the lspcon resume from .reset() to intel_dp_sink_dpms() Ville Syrjala
2020-10-16 19:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: s/intel_dp_sink_dpms/intel_dp_set_power/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-19 15:31 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-16 20:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Move the lspcon resume from .reset() to intel_dp_sink_dpms() Patchwork
2020-10-17 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-19 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Imre Deak
2020-10-19 15:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-19 15:51 ` Imre Deak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019155137.GI3199870@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox