From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, hariom.pandey@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/ehl: Implement W/A 22010492432
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:42:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201103154251.GC3990501@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103134651.165527-1-tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:16:51PM +0530, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> As per W/A implemented for TGL to program half of the nominal
> DCO divider fraction value which is also applicable on EHL.
>
> Changes since V1:
> - ehl_ used as to keep earliest platform prefix
> - WA required B0 stepping onwards
>
> Cc: Deak Imre <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index eaef7a2d041f..cb6ebf627c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2636,13 +2636,16 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Display WA #22010492432: tgl
> + * Display WA #22010492432: ehl, tgl
> * Program half of the nominal DCO divider fraction value.
> */
> static bool
> -tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +ehl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - return IS_TIGERLAKE(i915) && i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc == 38400;
> + return ((IS_PLATFORM(i915, INTEL_ELKHARTLAKE) &&
> + IS_JSL_EHL_REVID(i915, EHL_REVID_B0, EHL_REVID_B0)) ||
Imo, better to add a definition for IS_ELKHARTLAKE() and IS_EHL_REVID().
It also applies after B0, so it'd be
IS_EHL_REVID(EHL_REVID_B0, REVID_FOREVER);
> + IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) &&
> + i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc == 38400;
> }
>
> static int __cnl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -2696,7 +2699,7 @@ static int __cnl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> dco_fraction = (pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_MASK) >>
> DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_SHIFT;
>
> - if (tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(dev_priv))
> + if (ehl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(dev_priv))
> dco_fraction *= 2;
>
> dco_freq += (dco_fraction * ref_clock) / 0x8000;
> @@ -3086,7 +3089,7 @@ static void icl_calc_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>
> memset(pll_state, 0, sizeof(*pll_state));
>
> - if (tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(i915))
> + if (ehl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(i915))
> dco_fraction = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dco_fraction, 2);
>
> pll_state->cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(dco_fraction) |
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index d548e10e1600..8bf59b57efc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ extern const struct i915_rev_steppings kbl_revids[];
> (IS_ICELAKE(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
>
> #define EHL_REVID_A0 0x0
> +#define EHL_REVID_B0 0x2
Where are the steppings specified for EHL? At least on the BSpec/29153
page I see EHL/B0 being 1.
>
> #define IS_JSL_EHL_REVID(p, since, until) \
> (IS_JSL_EHL(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
> --
> 2.28.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 13:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/ehl: Implement W/A 22010492432 Tejas Upadhyay
2020-11-03 14:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/ehl: Implement W/A 22010492432 (rev2) Patchwork
2020-11-03 14:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-03 15:42 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2020-11-03 16:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/ehl: Implement W/A 22010492432 Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
2020-11-03 16:54 ` Imre Deak
2020-11-03 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/ehl: Implement W/A 22010492432 (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201103154251.GC3990501@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=hariom.pandey@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox