From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Nuke intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() from skl+ wm code
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:22:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201111222233.GA31444@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106173042.7534-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:30:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() peeks at the
> plane's current state without holding the plane's mutex, trusting
> that the crtc's mutex will protect it. In practice that does work
> since our planes can't move between pipes, but it sets a bad
> example. intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() also
> relies on crtc_state.uapi.plane_mask which may be full of lies
> when it comes to the bigjoiner stuff, so soon we can't use it as
> is anyway. So best to just get rid of it entirely. Which we can
> easily do by switching to the g4x/vlv "raw" watermark approach.
>
> Later on we should even be able to move the "raw" watermark
> computation into the normal .plane_check() code, leaving only
> the merging/clamping of the final watermarks to the later
> stages. But that will require adjusting the ilk+ wm code
> similarly as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 41 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index f6f0626649e0..6b249969c394 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -755,6 +755,8 @@ struct intel_crtc_wm_state {
> } ilk;
>
> struct {
> + /* "raw" watermarks */
> + struct skl_pipe_wm raw;
> /* gen9+ only needs 1-step wm programming */
> struct skl_pipe_wm optimal;
> struct skl_ddb_entry ddb;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index e9ac6f1a5d28..85b4bfb02e2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5480,7 +5480,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> - struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> + struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.raw.planes[plane_id];
> struct skl_wm_params wm_params;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -5503,7 +5503,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_uv(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> enum plane_id plane_id)
> {
> - struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> + struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.raw.planes[plane_id];
> struct skl_wm_params wm_params;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -5524,10 +5524,13 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> {
> struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane);
> - const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id;
> + struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.raw.planes[plane_id];
> + const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> int ret;
>
> + memset(wm, 0, sizeof(*wm));
> +
> if (!intel_wm_plane_visible(crtc_state, plane_state))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -5549,10 +5552,14 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> static int icl_build_plane_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> - enum plane_id plane_id = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane)->id;
> + struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> + enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id;
> + struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.raw.planes[plane_id];
> int ret;
>
> + memset(wm, 0, sizeof(*wm));
> +
> /* Watermarks calculated in master */
> if (plane_state->planar_slave)
> return 0;
> @@ -5591,19 +5598,18 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> - struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> - struct intel_plane *plane;
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
> - int ret;
> + struct intel_plane *plane;
> + int ret, i;
>
> - /*
> - * We'll only calculate watermarks for planes that are actually
> - * enabled, so make sure all other planes are set as disabled.
> - */
> - memset(pipe_wm->planes, 0, sizeof(pipe_wm->planes));
> -
> - intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, plane_state,
> - crtc_state) {
> + for_each_new_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i) {
> + /*
> + * FIXME should perhaps check {old,new}_plane_crtc->hw.crtc
> + * instead but we don't populate that correctly for NV12 Y
> + * planes so for now hack this.
> + */
> + if (plane->pipe != crtc->pipe)
> + continue;
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> ret = icl_build_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane_state);
> @@ -5613,6 +5619,8 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal = crtc_state->wm.skl.raw;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -6273,6 +6281,7 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>
> skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(crtc, &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal);
> + crtc_state->wm.skl.raw = crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> }
>
> if (dev_priv->active_pipes) {
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-11 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-06 17:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: Eliminate intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() from skl+ wm code Ville Syrjala
2020-11-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Pass intel_atomic_state around Ville Syrjala
2020-11-09 21:47 ` Navare, Manasi
2020-11-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Nuke intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() from skl+ wm code Ville Syrjala
2020-11-11 22:22 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2020-11-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Pimp the watermark documentation a bit Ville Syrjala
2020-11-11 22:51 ` Navare, Manasi
2020-11-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Precompute can_sagv for each wm level Ville Syrjala
2020-11-12 13:59 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-11-13 14:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-11-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Store plane relative data rate in crtc_state Ville Syrjala
2020-11-13 15:26 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-11-06 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Remove skl_adjusted_plane_pixel_rate() Ville Syrjala
2020-11-13 15:24 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-11-06 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Eliminate intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() from skl+ wm code Patchwork
2020-11-06 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-11-13 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Eliminate intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state() from skl+ wm code (rev2) Patchwork
2020-11-13 22:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-14 2:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201111222233.GA31444@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox