From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915/gt: Track the overall awake/busy time
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:51:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210175111.GA26573@sdutt-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207193824.18114-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:38:16PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since we wake the GT up before executing a request, and go to sleep as
> soon as it is retired, the GT wake time not only represents how long the
> device is powered up, but also provides a summary, albeit an overestimate,
> of the device runtime (i.e. the rc0 time to compare against rc6 time).
>
> v2: s/busy/awake/
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 24 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 6 +++
> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
> index 174a24553322..8975717ace06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "intel_gt.h"
> #include "intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
> +#include "intel_gt_pm.h"
> #include "intel_llc.h"
> #include "intel_rc6.h"
> #include "intel_rps.h"
> @@ -558,7 +559,9 @@ static int rps_boost_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>
> seq_printf(m, "RPS enabled? %s\n", yesno(intel_rps_is_enabled(rps)));
> seq_printf(m, "RPS active? %s\n", yesno(intel_rps_is_active(rps)));
> - seq_printf(m, "GPU busy? %s\n", yesno(gt->awake));
> + seq_printf(m, "GPU busy? %s, %llums\n",
> + yesno(gt->awake),
> + ktime_to_ms(intel_gt_get_awake_time(gt)));
I think it would be useful to print the total time the gt has been alive
too. This would give a nice comparison to total awake time which you
print here. Should be easy enough to do.
> seq_printf(m, "Boosts outstanding? %d\n",
> atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters));
> seq_printf(m, "Interactive? %d\n", READ_ONCE(rps->power.interactive));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
> index 274aa0dd7050..c94e8ac884eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,28 @@ static void user_forcewake(struct intel_gt *gt, bool suspend)
> intel_gt_pm_put(gt);
> }
>
> +static void runtime_begin(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + local_irq_disable();
> + write_seqcount_begin(>->stats.lock);
> + gt->stats.start = ktime_get();
> + gt->stats.active = true;
> + write_seqcount_end(>->stats.lock);
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
> +
> +static void runtime_end(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + local_irq_disable();
> + write_seqcount_begin(>->stats.lock);
> + gt->stats.active = false;
> + gt->stats.total =
> + ktime_add(gt->stats.total,
> + ktime_sub(ktime_get(), gt->stats.start));
> + write_seqcount_end(>->stats.lock);
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
> +
> static int __gt_unpark(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> {
> struct intel_gt *gt = container_of(wf, typeof(*gt), wakeref);
> @@ -67,6 +89,7 @@ static int __gt_unpark(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> i915_pmu_gt_unparked(i915);
>
> intel_gt_unpark_requests(gt);
> + runtime_begin(gt);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -79,6 +102,7 @@ static int __gt_park(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
>
> GT_TRACE(gt, "\n");
>
> + runtime_end(gt);
> intel_gt_park_requests(gt);
>
> i915_vma_parked(gt);
> @@ -106,6 +130,7 @@ static const struct intel_wakeref_ops wf_ops = {
> void intel_gt_pm_init_early(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> intel_wakeref_init(>->wakeref, gt->uncore->rpm, &wf_ops);
> + seqcount_mutex_init(>->stats.lock, >->wakeref.mutex);
> }
>
> void intel_gt_pm_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> @@ -339,6 +364,30 @@ int intel_gt_runtime_resume(struct intel_gt *gt)
> return intel_uc_runtime_resume(>->uc);
> }
>
> +static ktime_t __intel_gt_get_awake_time(const struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + ktime_t total = gt->stats.total;
> +
> + if (gt->stats.active)
> + total = ktime_add(total,
> + ktime_sub(ktime_get(), gt->stats.start));
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> +ktime_t intel_gt_get_awake_time(const struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + unsigned int seq;
> + ktime_t total;
> +
> + do {
> + seq = read_seqcount_begin(>->stats.lock);
> + total = __intel_gt_get_awake_time(gt);
> + } while (read_seqcount_retry(>->stats.lock, seq));
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> #include "selftest_gt_pm.c"
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
> index 60f0e2fbe55c..63846a856e7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ int intel_gt_resume(struct intel_gt *gt);
> void intel_gt_runtime_suspend(struct intel_gt *gt);
> int intel_gt_runtime_resume(struct intel_gt *gt);
>
> +ktime_t intel_gt_get_awake_time(const struct intel_gt *gt);
> +
> static inline bool is_mock_gt(const struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> return I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(gt->awake == -ENODEV);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> index 6d39a4a11bf3..c7bde529feab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,30 @@ struct intel_gt {
>
> u32 pm_guc_events;
>
> + struct {
> + bool active;
> +
> + /**
> + * @lock: Lock protecting the below fields.
> + */
> + seqcount_mutex_t lock;
> +
> + /**
> + * @total: Total time this engine was busy.
> + *
> + * Accumulated time not counting the most recent block in cases
> + * where engine is currently busy (active > 0).
> + */
> + ktime_t total;
> +
> + /**
> + * @start: Timestamp of the last idle to active transition.
> + *
> + * Idle is defined as active == 0, active is active > 0.
> + */
> + ktime_t start;
> + } stats;
> +
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine_class[MAX_ENGINE_CLASS + 1]
> [MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE + 1];
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index f48df3545e39..c72160e3702f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -858,9 +858,10 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>
> wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
>
> - seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s [%d]\n",
> + seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s [%d], %llums\n",
> yesno(i915->gt.awake),
> - atomic_read(&i915->gt.wakeref.count));
> + atomic_read(&i915->gt.wakeref.count),
> + ktime_to_ms(intel_gt_get_awake_time(&i915->gt)));
Same here as above.
With that nit:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> seq_printf(m, "CS timestamp frequency: %u Hz\n",
> RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> index 97bb4aaa5236..fc762eec9601 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> @@ -516,6 +516,8 @@ config_status(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u64 config)
> if (!HAS_RC6(i915))
> return -ENODEV;
> break;
> + case I915_PMU_GT_AWAKE:
> + break;
> default:
> return -ENOENT;
> }
> @@ -623,6 +625,9 @@ static u64 __i915_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
> case I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY:
> val = get_rc6(&i915->gt);
> break;
> + case I915_PMU_GT_AWAKE:
> + val = ktime_to_ns(intel_gt_get_awake_time(&i915->gt));
> + break;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -938,6 +943,7 @@ create_event_attributes(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> __event(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY, "requested-frequency", "M"),
> __event(I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS, "interrupts", NULL),
> __event(I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY, "rc6-residency", "ns"),
> + __event(I915_PMU_GT_AWAKE, "awake", "ns"),
> };
> static const struct {
> enum drm_i915_pmu_engine_sample sample;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 6edcb2b6c708..04abd1ee89bf 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ enum drm_i915_pmu_engine_sample {
> #define I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY __I915_PMU_OTHER(1)
> #define I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS __I915_PMU_OTHER(2)
> #define I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY __I915_PMU_OTHER(3)
> +#define I915_PMU_GT_AWAKE __I915_PMU_OTHER(4)
>
> #define I915_PMU_LAST /* Deprecated - do not use */ I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 19:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915/gem: Drop false !i915_vma_is_closed assertion Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/20] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/20] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/20] drm/i915/gt: Remove virtual breadcrumb before transfer Chris Wilson
2020-12-10 17:28 ` Matthew Brost
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/20] drm/i915/gt: Shrink the critical section for irq signaling Chris Wilson
2020-12-10 17:37 ` Matthew Brost
2020-12-11 11:21 ` Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/20] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/20] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915/gt: Track the overall awake/busy time Chris Wilson
2020-12-10 17:51 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2020-12-13 19:51 ` Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915: Encode fence specific waitqueue behaviour into the wait.flags Chris Wilson
2020-12-10 18:03 ` Matthew Brost
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915/gt: Track all timelines created using the HWSP Chris Wilson
2020-12-08 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/20] drm/i915/gt: Wrap intel_timeline.has_initial_breadcrumb Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/20] drm/i915/gt: Track timeline GGTT offset separately from subpage offset Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/20] drm/i915/gt: Add timeline "mode" Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/20] drm/i915/gt: Use indices for writing into relative timelines Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/20] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise relative timeline modes Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/20] drm/i915/gt: Use ppHWSP for unshared non-semaphore related timelines Chris Wilson
2020-12-07 19:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [01/20] drm/i915/gem: Drop false !i915_vma_is_closed assertion Patchwork
2020-12-07 20:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-07 21:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-12-08 13:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [01/20] drm/i915/gem: Drop false !i915_vma_is_closed assertion (rev2) Patchwork
2020-12-08 13:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915/gem: Drop false !i915_vma_is_closed assertion Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-12-08 14:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/20] drm/i915/gem: Drop false !i915_vma_is_closed assertion (rev2) Patchwork
2020-12-08 16:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201210175111.GA26573@sdutt-i7 \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox