* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info
@ 2021-01-20 15:16 José Roberto de Souza
2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode José Roberto de Souza
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Valid, ranks and bandwidth_kbps are set into dram_info but are not
used anywhere else so nuking it.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 --
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 47 +++++++------------------------
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index f5666b44ea9d..a1cc60de99f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -609,8 +609,8 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv);
/*
- * Fill the dram structure to get the system raw bandwidth and
- * dram info. This will be used for memory latency calculation.
+ * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be
+ * used for memory latency calculation.
*/
intel_dram_detect(dev_priv);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 8376cff5ba86..250e92910fa1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1134,11 +1134,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
} wm;
struct dram_info {
- bool valid;
bool is_16gb_dimm;
u8 num_channels;
- u8 ranks;
- u32 bandwidth_kbps;
bool symmetric_memory;
enum intel_dram_type {
INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
index 4754296a250e..694fbd8c9cd4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
@@ -201,17 +201,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
return -EINVAL;
}
- /*
- * If any of the channel is single rank channel, worst case output
- * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank
- * memory.
- */
- if (ch0.ranks == 1 || ch1.ranks == 1)
- dram_info->ranks = 1;
- else
- dram_info->ranks = max(ch0.ranks, ch1.ranks);
-
- if (dram_info->ranks == 0) {
+ if (ch0.ranks == 0 && ch1.ranks == 0) {
drm_info(&i915->drm, "couldn't get memory rank information\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -269,16 +259,12 @@ skl_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
mem_freq_khz = DIV_ROUND_UP((val & SKL_REQ_DATA_MASK) *
SKL_MEMORY_FREQ_MULTIPLIER_HZ, 1000);
- dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = dram_info->num_channels *
- mem_freq_khz * 8;
-
- if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) {
+ if (dram_info->num_channels * mem_freq_khz == 0) {
drm_info(&i915->drm,
"Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- dram_info->valid = true;
return 0;
}
@@ -365,7 +351,7 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info;
u32 dram_channels;
u32 mem_freq_khz, val;
- u8 num_active_channels;
+ u8 num_active_channels, valid_ranks = 0;
int i;
val = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, BXT_P_CR_MC_BIOS_REQ_0_0_0);
@@ -375,10 +361,7 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
dram_channels = val & BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_MASK;
num_active_channels = hweight32(dram_channels);
- /* Each active bit represents 4-byte channel */
- dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels * 4);
-
- if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) {
+ if (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels == 0) {
drm_info(&i915->drm,
"Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -410,27 +393,18 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
dimm.size, dimm.width, dimm.ranks,
intel_dram_type_str(type));
- /*
- * If any of the channel is single rank channel,
- * worst case output will be same as if single rank
- * memory, so consider single rank memory.
- */
- if (dram_info->ranks == 0)
- dram_info->ranks = dimm.ranks;
- else if (dimm.ranks == 1)
- dram_info->ranks = 1;
+ if (valid_ranks == 0)
+ valid_ranks = dimm.ranks;
if (type != INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN)
dram_info->type = type;
}
- if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN || dram_info->ranks == 0) {
+ if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN || valid_ranks == 0) {
drm_info(&i915->drm, "couldn't get memory information\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- dram_info->valid = true;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -456,11 +430,10 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
if (ret)
return;
- drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM bandwidth: %u kBps, channels: %u\n",
- dram_info->bandwidth_kbps, dram_info->num_channels);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM channels: %u\n", dram_info->num_channels);
- drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM ranks: %u, 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n",
- dram_info->ranks, yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n",
+ yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
}
static u32 gen9_edram_size_mb(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 cap)
--
2.30.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode 2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 ` José Roberto de Souza 2021-01-27 14:49 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information José Roberto de Souza ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx Up to now we were reading some DRAM information from MCHBAR register and from pcode what is already not good but some GEN12(TGL-H and ADL-S) platforms have MCHBAR DRAM information in different offsets. This was notified to HW team that decided that the best alternative is always apply the 16gb_dimm watermark adjustment for GEN12+ platforms and read the remaning DRAM information needed to other display programming from pcode. So here moving the DRAM pcode function to intel_dram.c, removing the duplicated fields from intel_qgv_info, setting and using information from dram_info. Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 98 +++++-------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c index bd060404d249..1368bd96ed73 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c @@ -19,77 +19,9 @@ struct intel_qgv_point { struct intel_qgv_info { struct intel_qgv_point points[I915_NUM_QGV_POINTS]; - u8 num_points; - u8 num_channels; u8 t_bl; - enum intel_dram_type dram_type; }; -static int icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, - struct intel_qgv_info *qi) -{ - u32 val = 0; - int ret; - - ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, - ICL_PCODE_MEM_SUBSYSYSTEM_INFO | - ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_GLOBAL_INFO, - &val, NULL); - if (ret) - return ret; - - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) { - switch (val & 0xf) { - case 0: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; - break; - case 3: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; - break; - case 4: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; - break; - case 5: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; - break; - default: - MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); - break; - } - } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) { - switch (val & 0xf) { - case 0: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; - break; - case 1: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; - break; - case 2: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; - break; - case 3: - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; - break; - default: - MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); - break; - } - } else { - MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)); - qi->dram_type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; /* Conservative default */ - } - - qi->num_channels = (val & 0xf0) >> 4; - qi->num_points = (val & 0xf00) >> 8; - - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) - qi->t_bl = qi->dram_type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 16; - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) - qi->t_bl = qi->dram_type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 8; - - return 0; -} - static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_qgv_point *sp, int point) @@ -139,17 +71,19 @@ int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct intel_qgv_info *qi) { + struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; int i, ret; - ret = icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(dev_priv, qi); - if (ret) - return ret; + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) + qi->t_bl = dev_priv->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 16; + else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) + qi->t_bl = dev_priv->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 8; if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, - qi->num_points > ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points))) - qi->num_points = ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points); + dram_info->qgv_points > ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points))) + dram_info->qgv_points = ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points); - for (i = 0; i < qi->num_points; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < dram_info->qgv_points; i++) { struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi->points[i]; ret = icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i); @@ -171,12 +105,13 @@ static int icl_calc_bw(int dclk, int num, int den) return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(num * dclk * 100, den * 6); } -static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(const struct intel_qgv_info *qi) +static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + const struct intel_qgv_info *qi) { u16 dclk = 0; int i; - for (i = 0; i < qi->num_points; i++) + for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->dram_info.qgv_points; i++) dclk = max(dclk, qi->points[i].dclk); return dclk; @@ -207,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct intel_sa_info rkl_sa_info = { static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel_sa_info *sa) { + struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; struct intel_qgv_info qi = {}; bool is_y_tile = true; /* assume y tile may be used */ int num_channels; @@ -222,10 +158,10 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel "Failed to get memory subsystem information, ignoring bandwidth limits"); return ret; } - num_channels = qi.num_channels; + num_channels = dram_info->num_channels; deinterleave = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_channels, is_y_tile ? 4 : 2); - dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi); + dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(dev_priv, &qi); ipqdepthpch = 16; @@ -241,9 +177,9 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel clpchgroup = (sa->deburst * deinterleave / num_channels) << i; bi->num_planes = (ipqdepth - clpchgroup) / clpchgroup + 1; - bi->num_qgv_points = qi.num_points; + bi->num_qgv_points = dram_info->qgv_points; - for (j = 0; j < qi.num_points; j++) { + for (j = 0; j < dram_info->qgv_points; j++) { const struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi.points[j]; int ct, bw; @@ -274,7 +210,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel * SAGV point, but we can't send PCode commands to restrict it * as it will fail and pointless anyway. */ - if (qi.num_points == 1) + if (dram_info->qgv_points == 1) dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; else dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index a1cc60de99f0..66f763fe7a83 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c @@ -608,14 +608,15 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) goto err_msi; intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv); + + intel_pcode_init(dev_priv); + /* * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be * used for memory latency calculation. */ intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); - intel_pcode_init(dev_priv); - intel_bw_init_hw(dev_priv); return 0; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 250e92910fa1..a2ae21082b34 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private { INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3, INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4 } type; + u8 qgv_points; } dram_info; struct intel_bw_info { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c index 694fbd8c9cd4..1298823c957c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include "i915_drv.h" #include "intel_dram.h" +#include "intel_sideband.h" struct dram_dimm_info { u16 size; @@ -408,6 +409,78 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) return 0; } +static int icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; + u32 val = 0; + int ret; + + ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, + ICL_PCODE_MEM_SUBSYSYSTEM_INFO | + ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_GLOBAL_INFO, + &val, NULL); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) { + switch (val & 0xf) { + case 0: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; + break; + case 3: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; + break; + case 4: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; + break; + case 5: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; + break; + default: + MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); + return -1; + } + } else { + switch (val & 0xf) { + case 0: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; + break; + case 1: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; + break; + case 2: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; + break; + case 3: + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; + break; + default: + MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); + return -1; + } + } + + dram_info->num_channels = (val & 0xf0) >> 4; + dram_info->qgv_points = (val & 0xf00) >> 8; + + return 0; +} + +static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) +{ + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 11) { + int ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); + + if (ret) + return ret; + } else { + /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ + i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; + } + + return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); +} + void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info; @@ -423,7 +496,9 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9 || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) return; - if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915)) + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11) + ret = gen11_get_dram_info(i915); + else if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915)) ret = bxt_get_dram_info(i915); else ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); -- 2.30.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-27 14:49 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-01-27 16:37 ` Souza, Jose 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-01-27 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: José Roberto de Souza; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:16:09AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: >Up to now we were reading some DRAM information from MCHBAR register >and from pcode what is already not good but some GEN12(TGL-H and ADL-S) >platforms have MCHBAR DRAM information in different offsets. > >This was notified to HW team that decided that the best alternative is >always apply the 16gb_dimm watermark adjustment for GEN12+ platforms >and read the remaning DRAM information needed to other display >programming from pcode. > >So here moving the DRAM pcode function to intel_dram.c, removing >the duplicated fields from intel_qgv_info, setting and using >information from dram_info. > >Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 98 +++++-------------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c >index bd060404d249..1368bd96ed73 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c >@@ -19,77 +19,9 @@ struct intel_qgv_point { > > struct intel_qgv_info { > struct intel_qgv_point points[I915_NUM_QGV_POINTS]; >- u8 num_points; >- u8 num_channels; > u8 t_bl; >- enum intel_dram_type dram_type; humn... given this struct already has padding, we could very well leave the num_points field. See below. > static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > struct intel_qgv_point *sp, > int point) >@@ -139,17 +71,19 @@ int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > struct intel_qgv_info *qi) > { >+ struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; > int i, ret; > >- ret = icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(dev_priv, qi); >- if (ret) >- return ret; >+ if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) >+ qi->t_bl = dev_priv->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 16; >+ else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) >+ qi->t_bl = dev_priv->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 8; > > if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, >- qi->num_points > ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points))) >- qi->num_points = ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points); >+ dram_info->qgv_points > ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points))) >+ dram_info->qgv_points = ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points); previously we were overriding a member of qi. Now we are overriding a member of dram_info, which seems to cross the boundaries of what this code should be doing. So maybe: qi->num_points = dev_priv->dram_info->qgv_points; and leave the check alone and also the renames in this file? Also, dram_info->qgv_points should be named dram_info->num_qgv_points for consistency with other structs. > >- for (i = 0; i < qi->num_points; i++) { >+ for (i = 0; i < dram_info->qgv_points; i++) { > struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi->points[i]; > > ret = icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i); >@@ -171,12 +105,13 @@ static int icl_calc_bw(int dclk, int num, int den) > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(num * dclk * 100, den * 6); > } > >-static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(const struct intel_qgv_info *qi) >+static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >+ const struct intel_qgv_info *qi) > { > u16 dclk = 0; > int i; > >- for (i = 0; i < qi->num_points; i++) >+ for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->dram_info.qgv_points; i++) > dclk = max(dclk, qi->points[i].dclk); > > return dclk; >@@ -207,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct intel_sa_info rkl_sa_info = { > > static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel_sa_info *sa) > { >+ struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; > struct intel_qgv_info qi = {}; > bool is_y_tile = true; /* assume y tile may be used */ > int num_channels; >@@ -222,10 +158,10 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel > "Failed to get memory subsystem information, ignoring bandwidth limits"); > return ret; > } >- num_channels = qi.num_channels; >+ num_channels = dram_info->num_channels; > > deinterleave = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_channels, is_y_tile ? 4 : 2); >- dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi); >+ dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(dev_priv, &qi); > > ipqdepthpch = 16; > >@@ -241,9 +177,9 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel > clpchgroup = (sa->deburst * deinterleave / num_channels) << i; > bi->num_planes = (ipqdepth - clpchgroup) / clpchgroup + 1; > >- bi->num_qgv_points = qi.num_points; >+ bi->num_qgv_points = dram_info->qgv_points; see above, we already have num_ prefix here, let's keep it in dram_info as well. > >- for (j = 0; j < qi.num_points; j++) { >+ for (j = 0; j < dram_info->qgv_points; j++) { > const struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi.points[j]; > int ct, bw; > >@@ -274,7 +210,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel > * SAGV point, but we can't send PCode commands to restrict it > * as it will fail and pointless anyway. > */ >- if (qi.num_points == 1) >+ if (dram_info->qgv_points == 1) > dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; > else > dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED; >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c >index a1cc60de99f0..66f763fe7a83 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c >@@ -608,14 +608,15 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > goto err_msi; > > intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv); >+ >+ intel_pcode_init(dev_priv); >+ > /* > * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be > * used for memory latency calculation. > */ > intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); > >- intel_pcode_init(dev_priv); >- > intel_bw_init_hw(dev_priv); > > return 0; >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >index 250e92910fa1..a2ae21082b34 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >@@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private { > INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3, > INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4 > } type; >+ u8 qgv_points; > } dram_info; > > struct intel_bw_info { >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >index 694fbd8c9cd4..1298823c957c 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #include "i915_drv.h" > #include "intel_dram.h" >+#include "intel_sideband.h" > > struct dram_dimm_info { > u16 size; >@@ -408,6 +409,78 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > return 0; > } > >+static int icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >+{ >+ struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; >+ u32 val = 0; >+ int ret; >+ >+ ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, >+ ICL_PCODE_MEM_SUBSYSYSTEM_INFO | >+ ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_GLOBAL_INFO, >+ &val, NULL); >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ >+ if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) { >+ switch (val & 0xf) { >+ case 0: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; >+ break; >+ case 3: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; >+ break; >+ case 4: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; >+ break; >+ case 5: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; >+ break; >+ default: >+ MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); >+ return -1; >+ } >+ } else { >+ switch (val & 0xf) { >+ case 0: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; >+ break; >+ case 1: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; >+ break; >+ case 2: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; >+ break; >+ case 3: >+ dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; >+ break; >+ default: >+ MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); >+ return -1; >+ } >+ } >+ >+ dram_info->num_channels = (val & 0xf0) >> 4; >+ dram_info->qgv_points = (val & 0xf00) >> 8; >+ >+ return 0; >+} >+ >+static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >+{ >+ if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 11) { >+ int ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); >+ >+ if (ret) >+ return ret; >+ } else { >+ /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ >+ i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; >+ } >+ >+ return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); >+} >+ > void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > { > struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info; >@@ -423,7 +496,9 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9 || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) > return; > >- if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915)) >+ if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11) >+ ret = gen11_get_dram_info(i915); gen11 and gen12 implementation above are sufficiently different: better to keep the if/else chain here only static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { int ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); if (ret) return ret; return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); } static int gen12_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); } Also, now it seems we have lots of dead code since we are not calling skl_get_dram_info() for tgl. See tgl_get_dram_type(), skl_dram_get_channels_info, etc Lucas De Marchi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode 2021-01-27 14:49 ` Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-01-27 16:37 ` Souza, Jose 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Souza, Jose @ 2021-01-27 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: De Marchi, Lucas; +Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 06:49 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:16:09AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: > > Up to now we were reading some DRAM information from MCHBAR register > > and from pcode what is already not good but some GEN12(TGL-H and ADL-S) > > platforms have MCHBAR DRAM information in different offsets. > > > > This was notified to HW team that decided that the best alternative is > > always apply the 16gb_dimm watermark adjustment for GEN12+ platforms > > and read the remaning DRAM information needed to other display > > programming from pcode. > > > > So here moving the DRAM pcode function to intel_dram.c, removing > > the duplicated fields from intel_qgv_info, setting and using > > information from dram_info. > > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 98 +++++-------------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++- > > 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c > > index bd060404d249..1368bd96ed73 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c > > @@ -19,77 +19,9 @@ struct intel_qgv_point { > > > > struct intel_qgv_info { > > struct intel_qgv_point points[I915_NUM_QGV_POINTS]; > > - u8 num_points; > > - u8 num_channels; > > u8 t_bl; > > - enum intel_dram_type dram_type; > > humn... given this struct already has padding, we could very well leave > the num_points field. See below. > > > static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > struct intel_qgv_point *sp, > > int point) > > @@ -139,17 +71,19 @@ int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > struct intel_qgv_info *qi) > > { > > + struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; > > int i, ret; > > > > - ret = icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(dev_priv, qi); > > - if (ret) > > - return ret; > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) > > + qi->t_bl = dev_priv->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 16; > > + else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) > > + qi->t_bl = dev_priv->dram_info.type == INTEL_DRAM_DDR4 ? 4 : 8; > > > > if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, > > - qi->num_points > ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points))) > > - qi->num_points = ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points); > > + dram_info->qgv_points > ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points))) > > + dram_info->qgv_points = ARRAY_SIZE(qi->points); > > previously we were overriding a member of qi. Now we are overriding a > member of dram_info, which seems to cross the boundaries of what this > code should be doing. > > So maybe: > > qi->num_points = dev_priv->dram_info->qgv_points; Okay, reasonable enough to keep this duplicated. > > and leave the check alone and also the renames in this file? > Also, dram_info->qgv_points should be named dram_info->num_qgv_points > for consistency with other structs. > > > > > - for (i = 0; i < qi->num_points; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < dram_info->qgv_points; i++) { > > struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi->points[i]; > > > > ret = icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i); > > @@ -171,12 +105,13 @@ static int icl_calc_bw(int dclk, int num, int den) > > return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(num * dclk * 100, den * 6); > > } > > > > -static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(const struct intel_qgv_info *qi) > > +static int icl_sagv_max_dclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > + const struct intel_qgv_info *qi) > > { > > u16 dclk = 0; > > int i; > > > > - for (i = 0; i < qi->num_points; i++) > > + for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->dram_info.qgv_points; i++) > > dclk = max(dclk, qi->points[i].dclk); > > > > return dclk; > > @@ -207,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct intel_sa_info rkl_sa_info = { > > > > static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel_sa_info *sa) > > { > > + struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; > > struct intel_qgv_info qi = {}; > > bool is_y_tile = true; /* assume y tile may be used */ > > int num_channels; > > @@ -222,10 +158,10 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel > > "Failed to get memory subsystem information, ignoring bandwidth limits"); > > return ret; > > } > > - num_channels = qi.num_channels; > > + num_channels = dram_info->num_channels; > > > > deinterleave = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_channels, is_y_tile ? 4 : 2); > > - dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(&qi); > > + dclk_max = icl_sagv_max_dclk(dev_priv, &qi); > > > > ipqdepthpch = 16; > > > > @@ -241,9 +177,9 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel > > clpchgroup = (sa->deburst * deinterleave / num_channels) << i; > > bi->num_planes = (ipqdepth - clpchgroup) / clpchgroup + 1; > > > > - bi->num_qgv_points = qi.num_points; > > + bi->num_qgv_points = dram_info->qgv_points; > > > see above, we already have num_ prefix here, let's keep it in dram_info > as well. Done, but will keep num_point in intel_qgv_info. We can rename it latter. > > > > > - for (j = 0; j < qi.num_points; j++) { > > + for (j = 0; j < dram_info->qgv_points; j++) { > > const struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi.points[j]; > > int ct, bw; > > > > @@ -274,7 +210,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct intel > > * SAGV point, but we can't send PCode commands to restrict it > > * as it will fail and pointless anyway. > > */ > > - if (qi.num_points == 1) > > + if (dram_info->qgv_points == 1) > > dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; > > else > > dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > index a1cc60de99f0..66f763fe7a83 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > @@ -608,14 +608,15 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > goto err_msi; > > > > intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv); > > + > > + intel_pcode_init(dev_priv); > > + > > /* > > * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be > > * used for memory latency calculation. > > */ > > intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); > > > > - intel_pcode_init(dev_priv); > > - > > intel_bw_init_hw(dev_priv); > > > > return 0; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > index 250e92910fa1..a2ae21082b34 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private { > > INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3, > > INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4 > > } type; > > + u8 qgv_points; > > } dram_info; > > > > struct intel_bw_info { > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c > > index 694fbd8c9cd4..1298823c957c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > > > #include "i915_drv.h" > > #include "intel_dram.h" > > +#include "intel_sideband.h" > > > > struct dram_dimm_info { > > u16 size; > > @@ -408,6 +409,78 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static int icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > +{ > > + struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info; > > + u32 val = 0; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, > > + ICL_PCODE_MEM_SUBSYSYSTEM_INFO | > > + ICL_PCODE_MEM_SS_READ_GLOBAL_INFO, > > + &val, NULL); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12)) { > > + switch (val & 0xf) { > > + case 0: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; > > + break; > > + case 3: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; > > + break; > > + case 4: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; > > + break; > > + case 5: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; > > + break; > > + default: > > + MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + } else { > > + switch (val & 0xf) { > > + case 0: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR4; > > + break; > > + case 1: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_DDR3; > > + break; > > + case 2: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR3; > > + break; > > + case 3: > > + dram_info->type = INTEL_DRAM_LPDDR4; > > + break; > > + default: > > + MISSING_CASE(val & 0xf); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + dram_info->num_channels = (val & 0xf0) >> 4; > > + dram_info->qgv_points = (val & 0xf00) >> 8; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > +{ > > + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) == 11) { > > + int ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); > > + > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + } else { > > + /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ > > + i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; > > + } > > + > > + return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); > > +} > > + > > void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > { > > struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info; > > @@ -423,7 +496,9 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9 || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) > > return; > > > > - if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915)) > > + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11) > > + ret = gen11_get_dram_info(i915); > > gen11 and gen12 implementation above are sufficiently different: better > to keep the if/else chain here only > > static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > { > int ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); > if (ret) > return ret; > > return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); > } > > > static int gen12_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > { > /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ > i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; > > return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); > } Done > > Also, now it seems we have lots of dead code since we are not calling > skl_get_dram_info() for tgl. See > tgl_get_dram_type(), skl_dram_get_channels_info, etc Can't find those. > > Lucas De Marchi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information 2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 ` José Roberto de Souza 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed José Roberto de Souza ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx DRAM information is required to properly program display. Before "drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode" we were failing driver load if unable to fetch DRAM information from pcode form GEN11+ but we should also extend it to GEN9 plaforms. Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 6 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 13 +++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 66f763fe7a83..6bfcd3ee6c66 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c @@ -615,12 +615,16 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be * used for memory latency calculation. */ - intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); + ret = intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); + if (ret) + goto err_dram; intel_bw_init_hw(dev_priv); return 0; +err_dram: + intel_gvt_driver_remove(dev_priv); err_msi: if (pdev->msi_enabled) pci_disable_msi(pdev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c index 1298823c957c..4871d48589f9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); } -void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) +int intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) { struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info; int ret; @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = !IS_GEN9_LP(i915); if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9 || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) - return; + return 0; if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11) ret = gen11_get_dram_info(i915); @@ -502,13 +502,18 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) ret = bxt_get_dram_info(i915); else ret = skl_get_dram_info(i915); - if (ret) - return; + + if (ret) { + drm_warn(&i915->drm, "Unable to load dram information\n"); + return ret; + } drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM channels: %u\n", dram_info->num_channels); drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); + + return 0; } static u32 gen9_edram_size_mb(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 cap) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.h index 4ba13c13162c..2a0f283b1a1d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.h @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private; void intel_dram_edram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915); -void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915); +int intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915); #endif /* __INTEL_DRAM_H__ */ -- 2.30.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed 2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode José Roberto de Souza 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 ` José Roberto de Souza 2021-01-27 14:56 ` Lucas De Marchi [not found] ` <20210120183151.jpfuda4htxs5qkxq@ldmartin-desk1> ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-20 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx As it now it is always required for GEN12+ the is_16gb_dimm name do not make sense for GEN12+. Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 10 +++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index a2ae21082b34..adc008c65b14 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private { } wm; struct dram_info { - bool is_16gb_dimm; + bool wm_lv_0_adjust_needed; u8 num_channels; bool symmetric_memory; enum intel_dram_type { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c index 4871d48589f9..a5850f0f25aa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) return -EINVAL; } - dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm; + dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm; dram_info->symmetric_memory = intel_is_dram_symmetric(&ch0, &ch1); @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) return ret; } else { /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ - i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; + i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = true; } return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ int intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) * This is only used for the level 0 watermark latency * w/a which does not apply to bxt/glk. */ - dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = !IS_GEN9_LP(i915); + dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = !IS_GEN9_LP(i915); if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9 || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) return 0; @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ int intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM channels: %u\n", dram_info->num_channels); - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", - yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Watermark level 0 adjustment needed: %s\n", + yesno(dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 992fce8b8d13..f778aae19f82 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2930,7 +2930,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, * any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm * to avoid any underrun. */ - if (dev_priv->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm) + if (dev_priv->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed) wm[0] += 1; } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) { -- 2.30.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed 2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed José Roberto de Souza @ 2021-01-27 14:56 ` Lucas De Marchi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-01-27 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: José Roberto de Souza; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:16:11AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: >As it now it is always required for GEN12+ the is_16gb_dimm name >do not make sense for GEN12+. > >Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 10 +++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >index a2ae21082b34..adc008c65b14 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private { > } wm; > > struct dram_info { >- bool is_16gb_dimm; >+ bool wm_lv_0_adjust_needed; > u8 num_channels; > bool symmetric_memory; > enum intel_dram_type { >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >index 4871d48589f9..a5850f0f25aa 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > return -EINVAL; > } > >- dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm; >+ dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm; > > dram_info->symmetric_memory = intel_is_dram_symmetric(&ch0, &ch1); > >@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > return ret; > } else { > /* Always needed for GEN12+ */ >- i915->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm = true; >+ i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = true; > } > > return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915); >@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ int intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > * This is only used for the level 0 watermark latency > * w/a which does not apply to bxt/glk. > */ >- dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = !IS_GEN9_LP(i915); >+ dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = !IS_GEN9_LP(i915); comment above also needs to be updated. With that: Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Lucas De Marchi > > if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9 || !HAS_DISPLAY(i915)) > return 0; >@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ int intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM channels: %u\n", dram_info->num_channels); > >- drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", >- yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); >+ drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Watermark level 0 adjustment needed: %s\n", >+ yesno(dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)); > > return 0; > } >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >index 992fce8b8d13..f778aae19f82 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >@@ -2930,7 +2930,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > * any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm > * to avoid any underrun. > */ >- if (dev_priv->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm) >+ if (dev_priv->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed) > wm[0] += 1; > > } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) { >-- >2.30.0 > >_______________________________________________ >Intel-gfx mailing list >Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20210120183151.jpfuda4htxs5qkxq@ldmartin-desk1>]
[parent not found: <5168c1572a7c106313f7c47194cae267835b32af.camel@intel.com>]
[parent not found: <20210120185245.2eqa42nmbm6yzeki@ldmartin-desk1>]
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info [not found] ` <20210120185245.2eqa42nmbm6yzeki@ldmartin-desk1> @ 2021-01-20 19:29 ` Souza, Jose 2021-01-27 14:35 ` Lucas De Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Souza, Jose @ 2021-01-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: De Marchi, Lucas; +Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 10:52 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:42:46AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 10:31 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:16:08AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: > > > > Valid, ranks and bandwidth_kbps are set into dram_info but are not > > > > used anywhere else so nuking it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 +-- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 -- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 47 +++++++------------------------ > > > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > > > index f5666b44ea9d..a1cc60de99f0 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c > > > > @@ -609,8 +609,8 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > > > > > > > intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv); > > > > /* > > > > - * Fill the dram structure to get the system raw bandwidth and > > > > - * dram info. This will be used for memory latency calculation. > > > > + * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be > > > > + * used for memory latency calculation. > > > > */ > > > > intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > index 8376cff5ba86..250e92910fa1 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > @@ -1134,11 +1134,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private { > > > > } wm; > > > > > > > > struct dram_info { > > > > - bool valid; > > > > bool is_16gb_dimm; > > > > u8 num_channels; > > > > - u8 ranks; > > > > - u32 bandwidth_kbps; > > > > bool symmetric_memory; > > > > enum intel_dram_type { > > > > INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN, > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c > > > > index 4754296a250e..694fbd8c9cd4 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c > > > > @@ -201,17 +201,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - /* > > > > - * If any of the channel is single rank channel, worst case output > > > > - * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank > > > > - * memory. > > > > - */ > > > > - if (ch0.ranks == 1 || ch1.ranks == 1) > > > > - dram_info->ranks = 1; > > > > - else > > > > - dram_info->ranks = max(ch0.ranks, ch1.ranks); > > > > - > > > > - if (dram_info->ranks == 0) { > > > > + if (ch0.ranks == 0 && ch1.ranks == 0) { > > > > > > previously if any of them were != 0, we would not fall here. > > > > This is the same behavior. > > indeed, I misread the condition > > > > > > > > > > > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, "couldn't get memory rank information\n"); > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > } > > > > @@ -269,16 +259,12 @@ skl_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > mem_freq_khz = DIV_ROUND_UP((val & SKL_REQ_DATA_MASK) * > > > > SKL_MEMORY_FREQ_MULTIPLIER_HZ, 1000); > > > > > > > > - dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = dram_info->num_channels * > > > > - mem_freq_khz * 8; > > > > - > > > > - if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) { > > > > + if (dram_info->num_channels * mem_freq_khz == 0) { > > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, > > > > "Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n"); > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - dram_info->valid = true; > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > @@ -365,7 +351,7 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info; > > > > u32 dram_channels; > > > > u32 mem_freq_khz, val; > > > > - u8 num_active_channels; > > > > + u8 num_active_channels, valid_ranks = 0; > > > > int i; > > > > > > > > val = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, BXT_P_CR_MC_BIOS_REQ_0_0_0); > > > > @@ -375,10 +361,7 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > dram_channels = val & BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_MASK; > > > > num_active_channels = hweight32(dram_channels); > > > > > > > > - /* Each active bit represents 4-byte channel */ > > > > - dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels * 4); > > > > - > > > > - if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) { > > > > + if (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels == 0) { > > > > > > maybe better to replace with a local var? > > > > > > bandwidth_kbps = mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels; > > > > > > and then check it where needed. > > > > The only place it is used is in this if to return -EINVAL, same for the SKL function. > > The multiplication fits under the 80 col limit so don't see why add a local var. > > ok... maybe `if (!mem_freq_khz || !num_active_channels)` then? That works too but I still prefer keep it as close as possible from the previous check. > > > LUcas De Marchi > > > > > > > > > Lucas De Marchi > > > > > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, > > > > "Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n"); > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > @@ -410,27 +393,18 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > dimm.size, dimm.width, dimm.ranks, > > > > intel_dram_type_str(type)); > > > > > > > > - /* > > > > - * If any of the channel is single rank channel, > > > > - * worst case output will be same as if single rank > > > > - * memory, so consider single rank memory. > > > > - */ > > > > - if (dram_info->ranks == 0) > > > > - dram_info->ranks = dimm.ranks; > > > > - else if (dimm.ranks == 1) > > > > - dram_info->ranks = 1; > > > > + if (valid_ranks == 0) > > > > + valid_ranks = dimm.ranks; > > > > > > > > if (type != INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN) > > > > dram_info->type = type; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN || dram_info->ranks == 0) { > > > > + if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN || valid_ranks == 0) { > > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, "couldn't get memory information\n"); > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - dram_info->valid = true; > > > > - > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > @@ -456,11 +430,10 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > if (ret) > > > > return; > > > > > > > > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM bandwidth: %u kBps, channels: %u\n", > > > > - dram_info->bandwidth_kbps, dram_info->num_channels); > > > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM channels: %u\n", dram_info->num_channels); > > > > > > > > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM ranks: %u, 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", > > > > - dram_info->ranks, yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); > > > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", > > > > + yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); > > > > } > > > > > > > > static u32 gen9_edram_size_mb(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 cap) > > > > -- > > > > 2.30.0 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info 2021-01-20 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info Souza, Jose @ 2021-01-27 14:35 ` Lucas De Marchi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-01-27 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:29:37PM +0000, Jose Souza wrote: >On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 10:52 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:42:46AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: >> > On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 10:31 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:16:08AM -0800, Jose Souza wrote: >> > > > Valid, ranks and bandwidth_kbps are set into dram_info but are not >> > > > used anywhere else so nuking it. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> >> > > > --- >> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 +-- >> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 -- >> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 47 +++++++------------------------ >> > > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) >> > > > >> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c >> > > > index f5666b44ea9d..a1cc60de99f0 100644 >> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c >> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c >> > > > @@ -609,8 +609,8 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> > > > >> > > > intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv); >> > > > /* >> > > > - * Fill the dram structure to get the system raw bandwidth and >> > > > - * dram info. This will be used for memory latency calculation. >> > > > + * Fill the dram structure to get the system dram info. This will be >> > > > + * used for memory latency calculation. >> > > > */ >> > > > intel_dram_detect(dev_priv); >> > > > >> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >> > > > index 8376cff5ba86..250e92910fa1 100644 >> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >> > > > @@ -1134,11 +1134,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private { >> > > > } wm; >> > > > >> > > > struct dram_info { >> > > > - bool valid; >> > > > bool is_16gb_dimm; >> > > > u8 num_channels; >> > > > - u8 ranks; >> > > > - u32 bandwidth_kbps; >> > > > bool symmetric_memory; >> > > > enum intel_dram_type { >> > > > INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN, >> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >> > > > index 4754296a250e..694fbd8c9cd4 100644 >> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c >> > > > @@ -201,17 +201,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> > > > return -EINVAL; >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > - /* >> > > > - * If any of the channel is single rank channel, worst case output >> > > > - * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank >> > > > - * memory. >> > > > - */ >> > > > - if (ch0.ranks == 1 || ch1.ranks == 1) >> > > > - dram_info->ranks = 1; >> > > > - else >> > > > - dram_info->ranks = max(ch0.ranks, ch1.ranks); >> > > > - >> > > > - if (dram_info->ranks == 0) { >> > > > + if (ch0.ranks == 0 && ch1.ranks == 0) { >> > > >> > > previously if any of them were != 0, we would not fall here. >> > >> > This is the same behavior. >> >> indeed, I misread the condition >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, "couldn't get memory rank information\n"); >> > > > return -EINVAL; >> > > > } >> > > > @@ -269,16 +259,12 @@ skl_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> > > > mem_freq_khz = DIV_ROUND_UP((val & SKL_REQ_DATA_MASK) * >> > > > SKL_MEMORY_FREQ_MULTIPLIER_HZ, 1000); >> > > > >> > > > - dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = dram_info->num_channels * >> > > > - mem_freq_khz * 8; >> > > > - >> > > > - if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) { >> > > > + if (dram_info->num_channels * mem_freq_khz == 0) { >> > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, >> > > > "Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n"); >> > > > return -EINVAL; >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > - dram_info->valid = true; >> > > > return 0; >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > @@ -365,7 +351,7 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> > > > struct dram_info *dram_info = &i915->dram_info; >> > > > u32 dram_channels; >> > > > u32 mem_freq_khz, val; >> > > > - u8 num_active_channels; >> > > > + u8 num_active_channels, valid_ranks = 0; >> > > > int i; >> > > > >> > > > val = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, BXT_P_CR_MC_BIOS_REQ_0_0_0); >> > > > @@ -375,10 +361,7 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> > > > dram_channels = val & BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_MASK; >> > > > num_active_channels = hweight32(dram_channels); >> > > > >> > > > - /* Each active bit represents 4-byte channel */ >> > > > - dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels * 4); >> > > > - >> > > > - if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) { >> > > > + if (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels == 0) { >> > > >> > > maybe better to replace with a local var? >> > > >> > > bandwidth_kbps = mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels; >> > > >> > > and then check it where needed. >> > >> > The only place it is used is in this if to return -EINVAL, same for the SKL function. >> > The multiplication fits under the 80 col limit so don't see why add a local var. >> >> ok... maybe `if (!mem_freq_khz || !num_active_channels)` then? > >That works too but I still prefer keep it as close as possible from the previous check. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Lucas De Marchi > >> >> >> LUcas De Marchi >> >> > >> > > >> > > Lucas De Marchi >> > > >> > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, >> > > > "Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n"); >> > > > return -EINVAL; >> > > > @@ -410,27 +393,18 @@ static int bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> > > > dimm.size, dimm.width, dimm.ranks, >> > > > intel_dram_type_str(type)); >> > > > >> > > > - /* >> > > > - * If any of the channel is single rank channel, >> > > > - * worst case output will be same as if single rank >> > > > - * memory, so consider single rank memory. >> > > > - */ >> > > > - if (dram_info->ranks == 0) >> > > > - dram_info->ranks = dimm.ranks; >> > > > - else if (dimm.ranks == 1) >> > > > - dram_info->ranks = 1; >> > > > + if (valid_ranks == 0) >> > > > + valid_ranks = dimm.ranks; >> > > > >> > > > if (type != INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN) >> > > > dram_info->type = type; >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > - if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN || dram_info->ranks == 0) { >> > > > + if (dram_info->type == INTEL_DRAM_UNKNOWN || valid_ranks == 0) { >> > > > drm_info(&i915->drm, "couldn't get memory information\n"); >> > > > return -EINVAL; >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > - dram_info->valid = true; >> > > > - >> > > > return 0; >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > @@ -456,11 +430,10 @@ void intel_dram_detect(struct drm_i915_private *i915) >> > > > if (ret) >> > > > return; >> > > > >> > > > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM bandwidth: %u kBps, channels: %u\n", >> > > > - dram_info->bandwidth_kbps, dram_info->num_channels); >> > > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM channels: %u\n", dram_info->num_channels); >> > > > >> > > > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM ranks: %u, 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", >> > > > - dram_info->ranks, yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); >> > > > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DRAM 16Gb DIMMs: %s\n", >> > > > + yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm)); >> > > > } >> > > > >> > > > static u32 gen9_edram_size_mb(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 cap) >> > > > -- >> > > > 2.30.0 >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list >> > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Intel-gfx mailing list >Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info 2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza ` (3 preceding siblings ...) [not found] ` <20210120183151.jpfuda4htxs5qkxq@ldmartin-desk1> @ 2021-01-20 21:32 ` Patchwork 2021-01-21 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev2) Patchwork 2021-01-22 18:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev3) Patchwork 6 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-20 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6545 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86092/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9650 -> Patchwork_19429 ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19429 absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_19429, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/index.html Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19429: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@i915_module_load@reload: - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19429 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@i915-to-amd: - fi-snb-2520m: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-snb-2520m/igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@i915-to-amd.html * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy: - fi-glk-dsi: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271]) +13 similar issues [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy.html * igt@i915_getparams_basic@basic-subslice-total: - fi-tgl-y: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_getparams_basic@basic-subslice-total.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_getparams_basic@basic-subslice-total.html * igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any: - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271]) +116 similar issues [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html * igt@runner@aborted: - fi-glk-dsi: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2292] / [i915#2295] / [k.org#202321] / [k.org#204565]) [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic: - fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][10] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][11] [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_render_tiled_blits@basic.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: - fi-snb-2520m: [INCOMPLETE][12] -> [PASS][13] [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-snb-2520m/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-snb-2520m/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html #### Warnings #### * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#109271]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109271]) +8 similar issues [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][18] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) -> [SKIP][19] ([fdo#109271]) [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9650/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315 [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827 [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190 [i915#2292]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2292 [i915#2295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2295 [i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2575 [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402 [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533 [k.org#202321]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202321 [k.org#204565]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204565 Participating hosts (43 -> 37) ------------------------------ Missing (6): fi-kbl-soraka fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_9650 -> Patchwork_19429 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_9650: 3f989d1bb4cfd91e25549f9fd7a750412581dcc4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5960: ace82fcd5f3623f8dde7c220a825873dc53dfae4 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_19429: 61037f310a0e0d6ed56e90fd6dd5b90001b71881 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == 61037f310a0e drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed 467a885ed1a0 drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information 67139f6e2aad drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode 4ff0251bf217 drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19429/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7902 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev2) 2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2021-01-20 21:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork @ 2021-01-21 22:35 ` Patchwork 2021-01-22 18:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev3) Patchwork 6 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-21 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7840 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86092/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9664 -> Patchwork_19441 ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19441 absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_19441, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/index.html Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19441: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@i915_module_load@reload: - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19441 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@semaphore: - fi-bdw-5557u: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +22 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@semaphore.html * igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind: - fi-bdw-5557u: NOTRUN -> [WARN][4] ([i915#2283]) [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy: - fi-glk-dsi: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271]) +13 similar issues [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy.html * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3: - fi-tgl-y: [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-WARN][7] ([i915#2411] / [i915#402]) [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload: - fi-kbl-guc: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2203] / [i915#579]) [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html * igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any: - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][10] -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271]) +116 similar issues [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html * igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files: - fi-tgl-y: [PASS][12] -> [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_self_import@basic-with_one_bo_two_files.html * igt@runner@aborted: - fi-glk-dsi: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2292] / [i915#2295] / [k.org#202321] / [k.org#204565]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@fbdev@read: - fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][16] +2 similar issues [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-tgl-y/igt@fbdev@read.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-tgl-y/igt@fbdev@read.html * igt@i915_module_load@reload: - fi-byt-j1900: [DMESG-WARN][17] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][18] [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-fast: - fi-kbl-7500u: [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#2868]) -> [PASS][20] [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-fast.html [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-fast.html #### Warnings #### * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][21] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#109271]) [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][23] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109271]) +8 similar issues [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][25] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#109271]) [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9664/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827 [i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982 [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190 [i915#2203]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2203 [i915#2283]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2283 [i915#2292]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2292 [i915#2295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2295 [i915#2411]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2411 [i915#2868]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2868 [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402 [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533 [i915#579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/579 [k.org#202321]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202321 [k.org#204565]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204565 Participating hosts (41 -> 37) ------------------------------ Missing (4): fi-ilk-m540 fi-bsw-cyan fi-bdw-samus fi-hsw-4200u Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_9664 -> Patchwork_19441 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_9664: dd119a66c9fc3706c93efa10a7631a4c499d94f3 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5962: 22e3daaed82ab7890018a2f2aabf5082cd536023 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_19441: a871e378b7e4c55928f79259f724df0111cc82b8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == a871e378b7e4 drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed 1d4c44951302 drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information 4901cd6b2e8f drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode 51817b52f494 drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19441/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9483 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev3) 2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2021-01-21 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev2) Patchwork @ 2021-01-22 18:49 ` Patchwork 6 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-22 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6347 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86092/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9670 -> Patchwork_19460 ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19460 absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_19460, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/index.html Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19460: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@i915_module_load@reload: - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19460 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@userptr: - fi-byt-j1900: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-byt-j1900/igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@userptr.html * igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy: - fi-glk-dsi: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271]) +13 similar issues [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy.html * igt@i915_hangman@error-state-basic: - fi-tgl-y: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_hangman@error-state-basic.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_hangman@error-state-basic.html * igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any: - fi-glk-dsi: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271]) +116 similar issues [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-set-prop-any.html * igt@runner@aborted: - fi-glk-dsi: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2292] / [i915#2295] / [k.org#202321] / [k.org#204565]) [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload: - fi-byt-j1900: [INCOMPLETE][10] ([i915#142] / [i915#2405]) -> [PASS][11] [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html * igt@vgem_basic@setversion: - fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][12] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][13] +2 similar issues [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-tgl-y/igt@vgem_basic@setversion.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-tgl-y/igt@vgem_basic@setversion.html #### Warnings #### * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#109271]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109271]) +8 similar issues [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d: - fi-glk-dsi: [SKIP][18] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) -> [SKIP][19] ([fdo#109271]) [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9670/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/fi-glk-dsi/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827 [i915#142]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/142 [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190 [i915#2292]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2292 [i915#2295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2295 [i915#2405]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2405 [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402 [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533 [k.org#202321]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202321 [k.org#204565]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204565 Participating hosts (41 -> 37) ------------------------------ Missing (4): fi-ilk-m540 fi-bsw-cyan fi-bdw-samus fi-hsw-4200u Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_9670 -> Patchwork_19460 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_9670: 85fd189b9fbfb6e7af8d956d37be012fdd6ae0ad @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5964: 0949766cb9846d7d55fac9cdf31d3d8e8ed1d0c6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_19460: c1f73ccb6d94db8505fdc03789e66427e71dcd6e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == c1f73ccb6d94 drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed 7a0944ee9f63 drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information f532480817a9 drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode d61e40e438c6 drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19460/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7825 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-27 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-20 15:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info José Roberto de Souza
2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gen11+: Only load DRAM information from pcode José Roberto de Souza
2021-01-27 14:49 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-01-27 16:37 ` Souza, Jose
2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Fail driver probe when unable to load DRAM information José Roberto de Souza
2021-01-20 15:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Rename is_16gb_dimm to wm_lv_0_adjust_needed José Roberto de Souza
2021-01-27 14:56 ` Lucas De Marchi
[not found] ` <20210120183151.jpfuda4htxs5qkxq@ldmartin-desk1>
[not found] ` <5168c1572a7c106313f7c47194cae267835b32af.camel@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20210120185245.2eqa42nmbm6yzeki@ldmartin-desk1>
2021-01-20 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info Souza, Jose
2021-01-27 14:35 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-01-20 21:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork
2021-01-21 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-22 18:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Nuke not needed members of dram_info (rev3) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox