From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 31/69] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:42:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311134249.588632-32-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311134249.588632-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
pin_map needs the ww lock, so ensure we pin both before submission.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 12 +++
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c | 95 +++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 6c3f75adb53c..983f2d4b2a85 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -437,6 +437,9 @@ void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
enum i915_map_type type);
+void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ enum i915_map_type type);
+
void __i915_gem_object_flush_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
unsigned long offset,
unsigned long size);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index e947d4c0da1f..a24617af3c93 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -400,6 +400,18 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
goto out_unlock;
}
+void *i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ enum i915_map_type type)
+{
+ void *ret;
+
+ i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
+ ret = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
+ i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
void __i915_gem_object_flush_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
unsigned long offset,
unsigned long size)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
index de6136bd10ac..a508614b2fd5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
@@ -103,15 +103,13 @@ read_nonprivs(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_vma *result)
int err;
int i;
- rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
+ rq = i915_request_create(ce);
if (IS_ERR(rq))
return rq;
- i915_vma_lock(result);
err = i915_request_await_object(rq, result->obj, true);
if (err == 0)
err = i915_vma_move_to_active(result, rq, EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
- i915_vma_unlock(result);
if (err)
goto err_rq;
@@ -176,10 +174,11 @@ static int check_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
u32 *vaddr;
int i;
- result = __vm_create_scratch_for_read(&engine->gt->ggtt->vm, PAGE_SIZE);
+ result = __vm_create_scratch_for_read_pinned(&engine->gt->ggtt->vm, PAGE_SIZE);
if (IS_ERR(result))
return PTR_ERR(result);
+ i915_gem_object_lock(result->obj, NULL);
vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(result->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
@@ -219,6 +218,8 @@ static int check_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
out_map:
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(result->obj);
out_put:
+ i915_vma_unpin(result);
+ i915_gem_object_unlock(result->obj);
i915_vma_put(result);
return err;
}
@@ -279,10 +280,14 @@ static int check_whitelist_across_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (IS_ERR(ce))
return PTR_ERR(ce);
- err = igt_spinner_init(&spin, engine->gt);
+ err = intel_context_pin(ce);
if (err)
goto out_ctx;
+ err = igt_spinner_init(&spin, engine->gt);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_unpin;
+
err = check_whitelist(ce);
if (err) {
pr_err("Invalid whitelist *before* %s reset!\n", name);
@@ -315,6 +320,13 @@ static int check_whitelist_across_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
err = PTR_ERR(tmp);
goto out_spin;
}
+ err = intel_context_pin(tmp);
+ if (err) {
+ intel_context_put(tmp);
+ goto out_spin;
+ }
+
+ intel_context_unpin(ce);
intel_context_put(ce);
ce = tmp;
@@ -327,6 +339,8 @@ static int check_whitelist_across_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
out_spin:
igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
+out_unpin:
+ intel_context_unpin(ce);
out_ctx:
intel_context_put(ce);
return err;
@@ -475,6 +489,7 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
for (i = 0; i < engine->whitelist.count; i++) {
u32 reg = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+ struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
u64 addr = scratch->node.start;
struct i915_request *rq;
u32 srm, lrm, rsvd;
@@ -490,6 +505,29 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
ro_reg = ro_register(reg);
+ i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, false);
+retry:
+ cs = NULL;
+ err = i915_gem_object_lock(scratch->obj, &ww);
+ if (!err)
+ err = i915_gem_object_lock(batch->obj, &ww);
+ if (!err)
+ err = intel_context_pin_ww(ce, &ww);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
+ cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+ if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(cs);
+ goto out_ctx;
+ }
+
+ results = i915_gem_object_pin_map(scratch->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+ if (IS_ERR(results)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(results);
+ goto out_unmap_batch;
+ }
+
/* Clear non priv flags */
reg &= RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ADDRESS_MASK;
@@ -501,12 +539,6 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
pr_debug("%s: Writing garbage to %x\n",
engine->name, reg);
- cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
- if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(cs);
- goto out_batch;
- }
-
/* SRM original */
*cs++ = srm;
*cs++ = reg;
@@ -553,11 +585,12 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
i915_gem_object_flush_map(batch->obj);
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(batch->obj);
intel_gt_chipset_flush(engine->gt);
+ cs = NULL;
- rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
+ rq = i915_request_create(ce);
if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
err = PTR_ERR(rq);
- goto out_batch;
+ goto out_unmap_scratch;
}
if (engine->emit_init_breadcrumb) { /* Be nice if we hang */
@@ -566,20 +599,16 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
goto err_request;
}
- i915_vma_lock(batch);
err = i915_request_await_object(rq, batch->obj, false);
if (err == 0)
err = i915_vma_move_to_active(batch, rq, 0);
- i915_vma_unlock(batch);
if (err)
goto err_request;
- i915_vma_lock(scratch);
err = i915_request_await_object(rq, scratch->obj, true);
if (err == 0)
err = i915_vma_move_to_active(scratch, rq,
EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
- i915_vma_unlock(scratch);
if (err)
goto err_request;
@@ -595,13 +624,7 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
pr_err("%s: Futzing %x timedout; cancelling test\n",
engine->name, reg);
intel_gt_set_wedged(engine->gt);
- goto out_batch;
- }
-
- results = i915_gem_object_pin_map(scratch->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
- if (IS_ERR(results)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(results);
- goto out_batch;
+ goto out_unmap_scratch;
}
GEM_BUG_ON(values[ARRAY_SIZE(values) - 1] != 0xffffffff);
@@ -612,7 +635,7 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
pr_err("%s: Unable to write to whitelisted register %x\n",
engine->name, reg);
err = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unpin;
+ goto out_unmap_scratch;
}
} else {
rsvd = 0;
@@ -678,15 +701,27 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
err = -EINVAL;
}
-out_unpin:
+out_unmap_scratch:
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(scratch->obj);
+out_unmap_batch:
+ if (cs)
+ i915_gem_object_unpin_map(batch->obj);
+out_ctx:
+ intel_context_unpin(ce);
+out:
+ if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+ err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+ if (!err)
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
if (err)
break;
}
if (igt_flush_test(engine->i915))
err = -EIO;
-out_batch:
+
i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&batch, 0);
out_scratch:
i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&scratch, 0);
@@ -820,7 +855,7 @@ static int scrub_whitelisted_registers(struct intel_context *ce)
if (IS_ERR(batch))
return PTR_ERR(batch);
- cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+ cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
err = PTR_ERR(cs);
goto err_batch;
@@ -955,11 +990,11 @@ check_whitelisted_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
u32 *a, *b;
int i, err;
- a = i915_gem_object_pin_map(A->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+ a = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(A->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
if (IS_ERR(a))
return PTR_ERR(a);
- b = i915_gem_object_pin_map(B->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+ b = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(B->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
if (IS_ERR(b)) {
err = PTR_ERR(b);
goto err_a;
--
2.30.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 13:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 00/69] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 01/69] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 21:22 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-15 12:08 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 02/69] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 21:44 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-15 12:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 03/69] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 04/69] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 05/69] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 06/69] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 07/69] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 08/69] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 09/69] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 10/69] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 11/69] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/69] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 13/69] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 14/69] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 15/69] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 16/69] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 17:24 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-15 12:36 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-16 8:47 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 17/69] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 18/69] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 19/69] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 20/69] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 21/69] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 22/69] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 23/69] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 24/69] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 25/69] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 26/69] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 27/69] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 28/69] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 29/69] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 30/69] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 32/69] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 33/69] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 34/69] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 35/69] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 36/69] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 37/69] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 38/69] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 39/69] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 40/69] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 41/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 42/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 43/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 44/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 45/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 46/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 47/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 48/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 49/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 50/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 51/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 52/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 53/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 54/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 55/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 56/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 57/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 58/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 59/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 60/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 61/69] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 62/69] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 63/69] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 64/69] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 65/69] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 66/69] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 67/69] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 68/69] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 69/69] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 14:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev16) Patchwork
2021-03-11 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-11 14:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-11 14:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-16 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev17) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210311134249.588632-32-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox