From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 58/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region tests for obj->mm.lock removal
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:42:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311134249.588632-59-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311134249.588632-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Use the unlocked variants for pin_map and pin_pages, and add lock
around unpinning/putting pages.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
.../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index 3e583139f767..759ac7e26e13 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -31,10 +31,12 @@ static void close_objects(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *on;
list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, on, objects, st_link) {
+ i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
/* No polluting the memory region between tests */
__i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj);
+ i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
list_del(&obj->st_link);
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
}
@@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ static int igt_mock_fill(void *arg)
break;
}
- err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+ err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
if (err) {
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
break;
@@ -109,7 +111,7 @@ igt_object_create(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
if (IS_ERR(obj))
return obj;
- err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+ err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
if (err)
goto put;
@@ -123,8 +125,10 @@ igt_object_create(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
static void igt_object_release(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
+ i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
__i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj);
+ i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
list_del(&obj->st_link);
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
}
@@ -509,7 +513,7 @@ static int igt_cpu_check(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, u32 dword, u32 val)
if (err)
return err;
- ptr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+ ptr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(obj, I915_MAP_WC);
if (IS_ERR(ptr))
return PTR_ERR(ptr);
@@ -614,7 +618,7 @@ static int igt_lmem_create(void *arg)
if (IS_ERR(obj))
return PTR_ERR(obj);
- err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+ err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
if (err)
goto out_put;
@@ -653,7 +657,7 @@ static int igt_lmem_write_gpu(void *arg)
goto out_file;
}
- err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+ err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
if (err)
goto out_put;
@@ -725,7 +729,7 @@ static int igt_lmem_write_cpu(void *arg)
if (IS_ERR(obj))
return PTR_ERR(obj);
- vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+ vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(obj, I915_MAP_WC);
if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
goto out_put;
@@ -828,7 +832,7 @@ create_region_for_mapping(struct intel_memory_region *mr, u64 size, u32 type,
return obj;
}
- addr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
+ addr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(obj, type);
if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
if (PTR_ERR(addr) == -ENXIO)
--
2.30.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 13:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 00/69] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 01/69] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 21:22 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-15 12:08 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 02/69] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 21:44 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-03-15 12:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 03/69] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 04/69] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 05/69] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 06/69] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 07/69] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 08/69] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 09/69] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 10/69] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 11/69] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/69] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 13/69] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 14/69] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 15/69] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 16/69] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 17:24 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-15 12:36 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-16 8:47 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 17/69] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 18/69] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 19/69] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 20/69] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 21/69] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 22/69] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 23/69] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 24/69] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 25/69] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 26/69] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 27/69] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 28/69] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 29/69] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 30/69] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 31/69] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 32/69] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 33/69] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 34/69] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 35/69] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 36/69] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 37/69] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 38/69] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 39/69] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 40/69] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 41/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 42/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 43/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 44/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 45/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 46/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 47/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 48/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 49/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 50/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 51/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 52/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 53/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 54/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 55/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 56/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 57/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 59/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 60/69] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 61/69] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 62/69] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 63/69] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 64/69] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 65/69] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 66/69] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 67/69] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 68/69] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 69/69] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst
2021-03-11 14:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev16) Patchwork
2021-03-11 14:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-11 14:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-11 14:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-03-16 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev17) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210311134249.588632-59-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox