From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/gem: only allow WB for smem only placements
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:27:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210625122751.590289-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210625122751.590289-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
We only support single mode and this should be immutable. For smem only
placements on DGFX this should be WB. On DG1 everything is snooped,
always, and so should be coherent.
I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT looks like it's for the aperture which is now gone
for DGFX, so hopefully can also be safely rejected.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
index d0c91697bb22..e3459a524e64 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
@@ -577,6 +577,13 @@ i915_gem_set_domain_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
goto out_unpin;
}
+ if (IS_DGFX(to_i915(obj->base.dev)) && obj->mm.n_placements == 1 &&
+ i915_gem_object_placements_contain_type(obj, INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM) &&
+ read_domains != I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unpin;
+ }
+
if (read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_WC)
err = i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(obj, write_domain);
else if (read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index f3586b36dd53..afc9f3dc38b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ __assign_mmap_offset(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
enum i915_mmap_type mmap_type,
u64 *offset, struct drm_file *file)
{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
struct i915_mmap_offset *mmo;
if (i915_gem_object_never_mmap(obj))
@@ -697,6 +698,15 @@ __assign_mmap_offset(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
i915_gem_object_placements_contain_type(obj, INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL))
return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * For smem only placements on DGFX we need to default to WB. On DG1
+ * everything is snooped always, so should always be coherent.
+ */
+ if (IS_DGFX(i915) &&
+ mmap_type != I915_MMAP_TYPE_WB && obj->mm.n_placements == 1 &&
+ i915_gem_object_placements_contain_type(obj, INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
mmo = mmap_offset_attach(obj, mmap_type, file);
if (IS_ERR(mmo))
return PTR_ERR(mmo);
--
2.26.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-25 12:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/gem: only allow WC for lmem Matthew Auld
2021-06-25 12:27 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2021-06-28 7:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/gem: only allow WB for smem only placements Thomas Hellström
2021-06-28 9:12 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-28 9:38 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-28 10:20 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-28 10:55 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-25 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gem: only allow WC for lmem Patchwork
2021-06-25 13:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-25 13:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-06-25 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-06-28 7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210625122751.590289-2-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox