Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:59:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728215946.1573015-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728215946.1573015-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

The only real platform with DISPLAY_VER == 10 is GLK. We don't need to
handle CNL explicitly in intel_dp.c.

Remove code and rename functions/macros accordingly to use ICL prefix.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 35 ++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index c386ef8eb200..db701ec5a221 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -222,29 +222,6 @@ bool intel_dp_can_bigjoiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 		 encoder->port != PORT_A);
 }
 
-static int cnl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
-{
-	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
-	enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
-
-	u32 voltage = intel_de_read(dev_priv, CNL_PORT_COMP_DW3) & VOLTAGE_INFO_MASK;
-
-	/* Low voltage SKUs are limited to max of 5.4G */
-	if (voltage == VOLTAGE_INFO_0_85V)
-		return 540000;
-
-	/* For this SKU 8.1G is supported in all ports */
-	if (IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv))
-		return 810000;
-
-	/* For other SKUs, max rate on ports A and D is 5.4G */
-	if (port == PORT_A || port == PORT_D)
-		return 540000;
-
-	return 810000;
-}
-
 static int icl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
 	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
@@ -270,7 +247,7 @@ static void
 intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
 	/* The values must be in increasing order */
-	static const int cnl_rates[] = {
+	static const int icl_rates[] = {
 		162000, 216000, 270000, 324000, 432000, 540000, 648000, 810000
 	};
 	static const int bxt_rates[] = {
@@ -295,12 +272,10 @@ intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
 		    intel_dp->source_rates || intel_dp->num_source_rates);
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		source_rates = cnl_rates;
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(cnl_rates);
-		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10)
-			max_rate = cnl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
-		else if (IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv))
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
+		source_rates = icl_rates;
+		size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_rates);
+		if (IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv))
 			max_rate = ehl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
 		else
 			max_rate = icl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28 21:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 23:39   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 16:23   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29  0:32   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 21:56     ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2021-07-28 23:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Patchwork
2021-07-29 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-30  0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-30  0:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-30 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210728215946.1573015-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox