Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:59:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728215946.1573015-21-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728215946.1573015-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

With the removal of CNL, let's consider ICL as the first platform using
those constants.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h   | 24 +++++++++++------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index d98c0c97c134..1be6a8c76478 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -11085,18 +11085,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
 #define  SKL_DRAM_RANK_1			(0x0 << 10)
 #define  SKL_DRAM_RANK_2			(0x1 << 10)
 #define  SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK			(0x1 << 10)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK			0x7F
-#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK			(0x3 << 7)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT			7
-#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8			(0x0 << 7)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16			(0x1 << 7)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32			(0x2 << 7)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_MASK			(0x3 << 9)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT			9
-#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_1			(0x0 << 9)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_2			(0x1 << 9)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_3			(0x2 << 9)
-#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_4			(0x3 << 9)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK			0x7F
+#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK			(0x3 << 7)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT			7
+#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8			(0x0 << 7)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16			(0x1 << 7)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32			(0x2 << 7)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_MASK			(0x3 << 9)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT			9
+#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_1			(0x0 << 9)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_2			(0x1 << 9)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_3			(0x2 << 9)
+#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_4			(0x3 << 9)
 
 #define SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC		_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5918)
 #define  DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK			REG_GENMASK(9, 2)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
index 83924732183d..91866520c173 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
@@ -77,21 +77,21 @@ static int skl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val)
 }
 
 /* Returns total Gb for the whole DIMM */
-static int cnl_get_dimm_size(u16 val)
+static int icl_get_dimm_size(u16 val)
 {
-	return (val & CNL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK) * 8 / 2;
+	return (val & ICL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK) * 8 / 2;
 }
 
-static int cnl_get_dimm_width(u16 val)
+static int icl_get_dimm_width(u16 val)
 {
-	if (cnl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
+	if (icl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	switch (val & CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) {
-	case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8:
-	case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16:
-	case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32:
-		val = (val & CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
+	switch (val & ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) {
+	case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8:
+	case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16:
+	case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32:
+		val = (val & ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
 		return 8 << val;
 	default:
 		MISSING_CASE(val);
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static int cnl_get_dimm_width(u16 val)
 	}
 }
 
-static int cnl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val)
+static int icl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val)
 {
-	if (cnl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
+	if (icl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	val = (val & CNL_DRAM_RANK_MASK) >> CNL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT;
+	val = (val & ICL_DRAM_RANK_MASK) >> ICL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT;
 
 	return val + 1;
 }
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ skl_dram_get_dimm_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 		       struct dram_dimm_info *dimm,
 		       int channel, char dimm_name, u16 val)
 {
-	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 10) {
-		dimm->size = cnl_get_dimm_size(val);
-		dimm->width = cnl_get_dimm_width(val);
-		dimm->ranks = cnl_get_dimm_ranks(val);
+	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 11) {
+		dimm->size = icl_get_dimm_size(val);
+		dimm->width = icl_get_dimm_width(val);
+		dimm->ranks = icl_get_dimm_ranks(val);
 	} else {
 		dimm->size = skl_get_dimm_size(val);
 		dimm->width = skl_get_dimm_width(val);
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28 21:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 23:39   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 16:23   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29  0:32   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 21:56     ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2021-07-28 23:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Patchwork
2021-07-29 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-30  0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-30  0:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-30 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210728215946.1573015-21-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox