From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/ttm: Reorganize the ttm move code somewhat
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:43:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210813144331.372957-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210813144331.372957-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
In order to make the code a bit more readable and to facilitate
async memcpy moves, reorganize the move code a little. Determine
at an early stage whether to copy or to clear.
v2:
- Don't set up the memcpy iterators unless we are actually going to memcpy.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 77 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
index 771eb2963123..d07de18529ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ i915_ttm_resource_get_st(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
}
static int i915_ttm_accel_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+ bool clear,
struct ttm_resource *dst_mem,
struct sg_table *dst_st)
{
@@ -449,13 +450,10 @@ static int i915_ttm_accel_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
return -EINVAL;
dst_level = i915_ttm_cache_level(i915, dst_mem, ttm);
- if (!ttm || !ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm)) {
+ if (clear) {
if (bo->type == ttm_bo_type_kernel)
return -EINVAL;
- if (ttm && !(ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC))
- return 0;
-
intel_engine_pm_get(i915->gt.migrate.context->engine);
ret = intel_context_migrate_clear(i915->gt.migrate.context, NULL,
dst_st->sgl, dst_level,
@@ -489,6 +487,41 @@ static int i915_ttm_accel_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
return ret;
}
+static void __i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool clear,
+ struct ttm_resource *dst_mem,
+ struct sg_table *dst_st)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = i915_ttm_accel_move(bo, clear, dst_mem, dst_st);
+ if (ret) {
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
+ struct intel_memory_region *dst_reg, *src_reg;
+ union {
+ struct ttm_kmap_iter_tt tt;
+ struct ttm_kmap_iter_iomap io;
+ } _dst_iter, _src_iter;
+ struct ttm_kmap_iter *dst_iter, *src_iter;
+
+ dst_reg = i915_ttm_region(bo->bdev, dst_mem->mem_type);
+ src_reg = i915_ttm_region(bo->bdev, bo->resource->mem_type);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!dst_reg || !src_reg);
+
+ dst_iter = !cpu_maps_iomem(dst_mem) ?
+ ttm_kmap_iter_tt_init(&_dst_iter.tt, bo->ttm) :
+ ttm_kmap_iter_iomap_init(&_dst_iter.io, &dst_reg->iomap,
+ dst_st, dst_reg->region.start);
+
+ src_iter = !cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) ?
+ ttm_kmap_iter_tt_init(&_src_iter.tt, bo->ttm) :
+ ttm_kmap_iter_iomap_init(&_src_iter.io, &src_reg->iomap,
+ obj->ttm.cached_io_st,
+ src_reg->region.start);
+
+ ttm_move_memcpy(bo, dst_mem->num_pages, dst_iter, src_iter);
+ }
+}
+
static int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
struct ttm_resource *dst_mem,
@@ -497,19 +530,11 @@ static int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
struct ttm_resource_manager *dst_man =
ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, dst_mem->mem_type);
- struct intel_memory_region *dst_reg, *src_reg;
- union {
- struct ttm_kmap_iter_tt tt;
- struct ttm_kmap_iter_iomap io;
- } _dst_iter, _src_iter;
- struct ttm_kmap_iter *dst_iter, *src_iter;
+ struct ttm_tt *ttm = bo->ttm;
struct sg_table *dst_st;
+ bool clear;
int ret;
- dst_reg = i915_ttm_region(bo->bdev, dst_mem->mem_type);
- src_reg = i915_ttm_region(bo->bdev, bo->resource->mem_type);
- GEM_BUG_ON(!dst_reg || !src_reg);
-
/* Sync for now. We could do the actual copy async. */
ret = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, ctx);
if (ret)
@@ -526,9 +551,8 @@ static int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
}
/* Populate ttm with pages if needed. Typically system memory. */
- if (bo->ttm && (dst_man->use_tt ||
- (bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SWAPPED))) {
- ret = ttm_tt_populate(bo->bdev, bo->ttm, ctx);
+ if (ttm && (dst_man->use_tt || (ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SWAPPED))) {
+ ret = ttm_tt_populate(bo->bdev, ttm, ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -537,23 +561,10 @@ static int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
if (IS_ERR(dst_st))
return PTR_ERR(dst_st);
- ret = i915_ttm_accel_move(bo, dst_mem, dst_st);
- if (ret) {
- /* If we start mapping GGTT, we can no longer use man::use_tt here. */
- dst_iter = !cpu_maps_iomem(dst_mem) ?
- ttm_kmap_iter_tt_init(&_dst_iter.tt, bo->ttm) :
- ttm_kmap_iter_iomap_init(&_dst_iter.io, &dst_reg->iomap,
- dst_st, dst_reg->region.start);
-
- src_iter = !cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) ?
- ttm_kmap_iter_tt_init(&_src_iter.tt, bo->ttm) :
- ttm_kmap_iter_iomap_init(&_src_iter.io, &src_reg->iomap,
- obj->ttm.cached_io_st,
- src_reg->region.start);
+ clear = !cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) && (!ttm || !ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm));
+ if (!(clear && ttm && !(ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC)))
+ __i915_ttm_move(bo, clear, dst_mem, dst_st);
- ttm_move_memcpy(bo, dst_mem->num_pages, dst_iter, src_iter);
- }
- /* Below dst_mem becomes bo->resource. */
ttm_bo_move_sync_cleanup(bo, dst_mem);
i915_ttm_adjust_domains_after_move(obj);
i915_ttm_free_cached_io_st(obj);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 14:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface Thomas Hellström
2021-08-13 14:43 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2021-08-13 14:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/ttm, drm/i915: Update ttm_move_memcpy for async use Thomas Hellström
2021-08-23 9:09 ` Christian König
2021-08-13 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface (rev3) Patchwork
2021-08-13 20:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-23 7:07 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-08-23 15:38 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-08-23 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210813144331.372957-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox