Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface (rev3)

["Vudum, Lakshminarayana" <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1617 bytes --]

Re-reported.

Lakshmi.

From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 12:07 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface (rev3)

On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 20:28 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series:

drm/i915, drm/ttm: Update the ttm_move_memcpy() interface (rev3)

URL:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91893/

State:

failure

Details:

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20819/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10482_full -> Patchwork_20819_full
Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20819_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_20819_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20819_full:

IGT changes
Possible regressions

  *   igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic:

     *   shard-glk: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10482/shard-glk8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic.html> -> FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20819/shard-glk5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-cursor-vs-flip-atomic.html>

Lakshmi, this failure is unrelated.

Thanks,
Thomas



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9757 bytes --]