Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
Date: Thu,  9 Sep 2021 22:33:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910053317.3379249-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910053317.3379249-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Now that the reference to the shadow table is stored within the uncore,
we don't need to generate separate fwtable, gen11_fwtable, and
gen12_fwtable variants of the register write functions; a single
'fwtable' implementation will work for all of those platforms now.

Note that while consolidating down to __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains()
we drop the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check.  If an MMIO offset is outside that
range on older platforms, it also won't be part of a range in the
forcewake table, so a '0' will be returned anyway.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 54 +++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 80533cf24fe8..c181e74fbf43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1081,23 +1081,6 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
 };
 
 #define __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
-({ \
-	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
-	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset)) && !is_shadowed(uncore, offset)) \
-		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, offset); \
-	__fwd; \
-})
-
-#define __gen11_fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
-({ \
-	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
-	const u32 __offset = (offset); \
-	if (!is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
-		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, __offset); \
-	__fwd; \
-})
-
-#define __gen12_fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
 ({ \
 	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
 	const u32 __offset = (offset); \
@@ -1685,34 +1668,29 @@ __gen6_write(8)
 __gen6_write(16)
 __gen6_write(32)
 
-#define __gen_write(func, x) \
+#define __gen_fwtable_write(x) \
 static void \
-func##_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+fwtable_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
 	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
 	GEN6_WRITE_HEADER; \
-	fw_engine = __##func##_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
+	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
 	if (fw_engine) \
 		__force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_engine); \
 	__raw_uncore_write##x(uncore, reg, val); \
 	GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
 }
 
-#define __gen_reg_write_funcs(func) \
-static enum forcewake_domains \
-func##_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) { \
-	return __##func##_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
-} \
-\
-__gen_write(func, 8) \
-__gen_write(func, 16) \
-__gen_write(func, 32)
-
+static enum forcewake_domains
+fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
+{
+	return __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg));
+}
 
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen12_fwtable);
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(fwtable);
+__gen_fwtable_write(8)
+__gen_fwtable_write(16)
+__gen_fwtable_write(32)
 
-#undef __gen_reg_write_funcs
+#undef __gen_fwtable_write
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_HEADER
 
@@ -2090,22 +2068,22 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen11_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
-- 
2.25.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-10  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-10  5:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table Matt Roper
2021-09-10  5:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable Matt Roper
2021-09-10 12:55   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10  5:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore Matt Roper
2021-09-10  5:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable Matt Roper
2021-09-10  5:33 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2021-09-10  5:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers Matt Roper
2021-09-10 12:54   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10  5:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table Matt Roper
2021-09-10  5:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table Patchwork
2021-09-10  5:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-10  6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-10  7:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-10 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 14:24   ` Matt Roper
2021-09-10 15:03     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 15:07       ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210910053317.3379249-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox