public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:42:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211013204231.19287-11-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013204231.19287-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids. This
is accomplished by partitioning guc_id space between ones that need to
be consecutive (1/16 available guc_ids) and ones that do not (15/16 of
available guc_ids). The consecutive search is implemented via the bitmap
API.

This is a precursor to the full GuC multi-lrc implementation but aligns
to how GuC mutli-lrc interface is defined - guc_ids must be consecutive
when using the GuC multi-lrc interface.

v2:
 (Daniel Vetter)
  - Explicitly state why we assign consecutive guc_ids
v3:
 (John Harrison)
  - Bring back in spin lock

Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |   6 +-
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 104 ++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 74f071a0b6d5..4ca197f400ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -82,9 +82,13 @@ struct intel_guc {
 		 */
 		spinlock_t lock;
 		/**
-		 * @guc_ids: used to allocate new guc_ids
+		 * @guc_ids: used to allocate new guc_ids, single-lrc
 		 */
 		struct ida guc_ids;
+		/**
+		 * @guc_ids_bitmap: used to allocate new guc_ids, multi-lrc
+		 */
+		unsigned long *guc_ids_bitmap;
 		/**
 		 * @guc_id_list: list of intel_context with valid guc_ids but no
 		 * refs
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index abf867f4f659..c4d7a5c3b558 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -128,6 +128,16 @@ guc_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings, unsigned int count);
 
 #define GUC_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
 
+/*
+ * We reserve 1/16 of the guc_ids for multi-lrc as these need to be contiguous
+ * per the GuC submission interface. A different allocation algorithm is used
+ * (bitmap vs. ida) between multi-lrc and single-lrc hence the reason to
+ * partition the guc_id space. We believe the number of multi-lrc contexts in
+ * use should be low and 1/16 should be sufficient. Minimum of 32 guc_ids for
+ * multi-lrc.
+ */
+#define NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID		(GUC_MAX_LRC_DESCRIPTORS / 16)
+
 /*
  * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which
  * require a lock.
@@ -1208,6 +1218,11 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	INIT_WORK(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker,
 		  destroyed_worker_func);
 
+	guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap =
+		bitmap_zalloc(NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1219,6 +1234,7 @@ void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(guc);
 	guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
 	i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
+	bitmap_free(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap);
 }
 
 static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
@@ -1270,18 +1286,43 @@ static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
-static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 {
-	return ida_simple_get(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids, 0,
-			      GUC_MAX_LRC_DESCRIPTORS, GFP_KERNEL |
-			      __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	int ret;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
+
+	if (intel_context_is_parent(ce))
+		ret = bitmap_find_free_region(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap,
+					      NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID,
+					      order_base_2(ce->parallel.number_children
+							   + 1));
+	else
+		ret = ida_simple_get(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids,
+				     NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID,
+				     GUC_MAX_LRC_DESCRIPTORS,
+				     GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+				     __GFP_NOWARN);
+	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
+		return ret;
+
+	ce->guc_id.id = ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __release_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 {
+	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
+
 	if (!context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
-		ida_simple_remove(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids,
-				  ce->guc_id.id);
+		if (intel_context_is_parent(ce))
+			bitmap_release_region(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap,
+					      ce->guc_id.id,
+					      order_base_2(ce->parallel.number_children
+							   + 1));
+		else
+			ida_simple_remove(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids,
+					  ce->guc_id.id);
 		reset_lrc_desc(guc, ce->guc_id.id);
 		set_context_guc_id_invalid(ce);
 	}
@@ -1298,49 +1339,64 @@ static void release_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
 }
 
-static int steal_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int steal_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 {
-	struct intel_context *ce;
-	int guc_id;
+	struct intel_context *cn;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&guc->submission_state.lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_parent(ce));
 
 	if (!list_empty(&guc->submission_state.guc_id_list)) {
-		ce = list_first_entry(&guc->submission_state.guc_id_list,
+		cn = list_first_entry(&guc->submission_state.guc_id_list,
 				      struct intel_context,
 				      guc_id.link);
 
-		GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id.ref));
-		GEM_BUG_ON(context_guc_id_invalid(ce));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&cn->guc_id.ref));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(context_guc_id_invalid(cn));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(cn));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_parent(cn));
 
-		list_del_init(&ce->guc_id.link);
-		guc_id = ce->guc_id.id;
+		list_del_init(&cn->guc_id.link);
+		ce->guc_id = cn->guc_id;
 
 		spin_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
-		clr_context_registered(ce);
+		clr_context_registered(cn);
 		spin_unlock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
-		set_context_guc_id_invalid(ce);
-		return guc_id;
+		set_context_guc_id_invalid(cn);
+
+		return 0;
 	} else {
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 }
 
-static int assign_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, u16 *out)
+static int assign_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 {
 	int ret;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&guc->submission_state.lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
 
-	ret = new_guc_id(guc);
+	ret = new_guc_id(guc, ce);
 	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
-		ret = steal_guc_id(guc);
+		if (intel_context_is_parent(ce))
+			return -ENOSPC;
+
+		ret = steal_guc_id(guc, ce);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	*out = ret;
+	if (intel_context_is_parent(ce)) {
+		struct intel_context *child;
+		int i = 1;
+
+		for_each_child(ce, child)
+			child->guc_id.id = ce->guc_id.id + i++;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1358,7 +1414,7 @@ static int pin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 	might_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
 
 	if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
-		ret = assign_guc_id(guc, &ce->guc_id.id);
+		ret = assign_guc_id(guc, ce);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out_unlock;
 		ret = 1;	/* Indidcates newly assigned guc_id */
@@ -1400,8 +1456,10 @@ static void unpin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id.ref) < 0);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
 
-	if (unlikely(context_guc_id_invalid(ce)))
+	if (unlikely(context_guc_id_invalid(ce) ||
+		     intel_context_is_parent(ce)))
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13 20:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 23:56   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 23:59   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:05   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:10   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14  4:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement parallel context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 16:56   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:25   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:28   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 16:26   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  1:02   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 15:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 16:43       ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 16:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 17:15           ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:48   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:55   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 15:34     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:57   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: Make request conflict tracking understand parallel submits Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:59   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: Update I915_GEM_BUSY IOCTL to understand composite fences Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev6) Patchwork
2021-10-13 21:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-13 22:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-14 17:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211013204231.19287-11-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox