public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:56:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47710db9-235c-5cee-2924-6854b5cd1b11@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013204231.19287-2-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On 10/13/2021 13:42, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Move guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct as a future
> patch will reuse the spin lock as a global submission state lock. Moving
> this into sub-struct makes ownership of fields / lock clear.
>
> v2:
>   (Docs)
>    - Add comment for submission_state sub-structure
> v3:
>   (John Harrison)
>    - Fixup a few comments
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  6 +--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        | 28 +++++++----
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 48 ++++++++++---------
>   3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> index 12252c411159..e7e3984aab78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -197,18 +197,18 @@ struct intel_context {
>   	struct {
>   		/**
>   		 * @id: handle which is used to uniquely identify this context
> -		 * with the GuC, protected by guc->contexts_lock
> +		 * with the GuC, protected by guc->submission_state.lock
>   		 */
>   		u16 id;
>   		/**
>   		 * @ref: the number of references to the guc_id, when
>   		 * transitioning in and out of zero protected by
> -		 * guc->contexts_lock
> +		 * guc->submission_state.lock
>   		 */
>   		atomic_t ref;
>   		/**
>   		 * @link: in guc->guc_id_list when the guc_id has no refs but is
> -		 * still valid, protected by guc->contexts_lock
> +		 * still valid, protected by guc->submission_state.lock
>   		 */
>   		struct list_head link;
>   	} guc_id;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> index 5dd174babf7a..82e248c2290c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
> @@ -71,16 +71,26 @@ struct intel_guc {
>   	} interrupts;
>   
>   	/**
> -	 * @contexts_lock: protects guc_ids, guc_id_list, ce->guc_id.id, and
> -	 * ce->guc_id.ref when transitioning in and out of zero
> +	 * @submission_state: sub-structure for submission state protected by
> +	 * single lock
>   	 */
> -	spinlock_t contexts_lock;
> -	/** @guc_ids: used to allocate unique ce->guc_id.id values */
> -	struct ida guc_ids;
> -	/**
> -	 * @guc_id_list: list of intel_context with valid guc_ids but no refs
> -	 */
> -	struct list_head guc_id_list;
> +	struct {
> +		/**
> +		 * @lock: protects everything in submission_state,
> +		 * ce->guc_id.id, and ce->guc_id.ref when transitioning in and
> +		 * out of zero
> +		 */
> +		spinlock_t lock;
> +		/**
> +		 * @guc_ids: used to allocate new guc_ids
> +		 */
> +		struct ida guc_ids;
> +		/**
> +		 * @guc_id_list: list of intel_context with valid guc_ids but no
> +		 * refs
> +		 */
> +		struct list_head guc_id_list;
> +	} submission_state;
>   
>   	/**
>   	 * @submission_supported: tracks whether we support GuC submission on
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index ba0de35f6323..b2646b088c7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -68,14 +68,14 @@
>    * fence is used to stall all requests associated with this guc_id until the
>    * corresponding G2H returns indicating the guc_id has been deregistered.
>    *
> - * guc_ids:
> + * submission_state.guc_ids:
>    * Unique number associated with private GuC context data passed in during
>    * context registration / submission / deregistration. 64k available. Simple ida
>    * is used for allocation.
>    *
>    * Stealing guc_ids:
>    * If no guc_ids are available they can be stolen from another context at
> - * request creation time if that context is unpinned. If a guc_id can't be found
> + * request creation time if that context is unpinned. If a guc_id an't be found
Oops?

John.


>    * we punt this problem to the user as we believe this is near impossible to hit
>    * during normal use cases.
>    *
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
>    * sched_engine can be submitting at a time. Currently only one sched_engine is
>    * used for all of GuC submission but that could change in the future.
>    *
> - * guc->contexts_lock
> + * guc->submission_state.lock
>    * Protects guc_id allocation for the given GuC, i.e. only one context can be
>    * doing guc_id allocation operations at a time for each GuC in the system.
>    *
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
>    *
>    * Lock ordering rules:
>    * sched_engine->lock -> ce->guc_state.lock
> - * guc->contexts_lock -> ce->guc_state.lock
> + * guc->submission_state.lock -> ce->guc_state.lock
>    *
>    * Reset races:
>    * When a full GT reset is triggered it is assumed that some G2H responses to
> @@ -1148,9 +1148,9 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   
>   	xa_init_flags(&guc->context_lookup, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
>   
> -	spin_lock_init(&guc->contexts_lock);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&guc->guc_id_list);
> -	ida_init(&guc->guc_ids);
> +	spin_lock_init(&guc->submission_state.lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&guc->submission_state.guc_id_list);
> +	ida_init(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
>   
>   static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   {
> -	return ida_simple_get(&guc->guc_ids, 0,
> +	return ida_simple_get(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids, 0,
>   			      GUC_MAX_LRC_DESCRIPTORS, GFP_KERNEL |
>   			      __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
>   }
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,8 @@ static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   static void __release_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	if (!context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
> -		ida_simple_remove(&guc->guc_ids, ce->guc_id.id);
> +		ida_simple_remove(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids,
> +				  ce->guc_id.id);
>   		reset_lrc_desc(guc, ce->guc_id.id);
>   		set_context_guc_id_invalid(ce);
>   	}
> @@ -1235,9 +1236,9 @@ static void release_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   	__release_guc_id(guc, ce);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   }
>   
>   static int steal_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
> @@ -1245,10 +1246,10 @@ static int steal_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   	struct intel_context *ce;
>   	int guc_id;
>   
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&guc->contexts_lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&guc->submission_state.lock);
>   
> -	if (!list_empty(&guc->guc_id_list)) {
> -		ce = list_first_entry(&guc->guc_id_list,
> +	if (!list_empty(&guc->submission_state.guc_id_list)) {
> +		ce = list_first_entry(&guc->submission_state.guc_id_list,
>   				      struct intel_context,
>   				      guc_id.link);
>   
> @@ -1273,7 +1274,7 @@ static int assign_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, u16 *out)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&guc->contexts_lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&guc->submission_state.lock);
>   
>   	ret = new_guc_id(guc);
>   	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> @@ -1295,7 +1296,7 @@ static int pin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id.ref));
>   
>   try_again:
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   
>   	might_lock(&ce->guc_state.lock);
>   
> @@ -1310,7 +1311,7 @@ static int pin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>   	atomic_inc(&ce->guc_id.ref);
>   
>   out_unlock:
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * -EAGAIN indicates no guc_id are available, let's retire any
> @@ -1346,11 +1347,12 @@ static void unpin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
>   	if (unlikely(context_guc_id_invalid(ce)))
>   		return;
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   	if (!context_guc_id_invalid(ce) && list_empty(&ce->guc_id.link) &&
>   	    !atomic_read(&ce->guc_id.ref))
> -		list_add_tail(&ce->guc_id.link, &guc->guc_id_list);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +		list_add_tail(&ce->guc_id.link,
> +			      &guc->submission_state.guc_id_list);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   }
>   
>   static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> @@ -1921,16 +1923,16 @@ static void guc_context_destroy(struct kref *kref)
>   	 * returns indicating this context has been deregistered the guc_id is
>   	 * returned to the pool of available guc_id.
>   	 */
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   	if (context_guc_id_invalid(ce)) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   		__guc_context_destroy(ce);
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!list_empty(&ce->guc_id.link))
>   		list_del_init(&ce->guc_id.link);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
>   
>   	/* Seal race with Reset */
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13 20:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 23:56   ` John Harrison [this message]
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 23:59   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:05   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:10   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14  4:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement parallel context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 16:56   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:25   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:28   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 16:26   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  1:02   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 15:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 16:43       ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 16:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 17:15           ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:48   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:55   ` John Harrison
2021-10-14 15:34     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:57   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: Make request conflict tracking understand parallel submits Matthew Brost
2021-10-14  0:59   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: Update I915_GEM_BUSY IOCTL to understand composite fences Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 21:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev6) Patchwork
2021-10-13 21:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-13 22:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-14 17:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-14 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47710db9-235c-5cee-2924-6854b5cd1b11@intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox