From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: expand on the kernel-doc for cache_dirty
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:45:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211018174508.2137279-7-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211018174508.2137279-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
Add some details around non-LLC platforms and cflushing, when dealing
with the flush-on-acquire, which is potentially security sensitive.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 11 ++++++++
.../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 1231224728e4..9c323666bd7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1933,6 +1933,17 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
* !(obj->cache_coherent & I915_BO_CACHE_COHERENT_FOR_READ)
* but gcc's optimiser doesn't handle that as well and emits
* two jumps instead of one. Maybe one day...
+ *
+ * FIXME: There is also sync flushing in set_pages(), which
+ * serves a different purpose(some of the time at least).
+ *
+ * We should consider:
+ *
+ * 1. Rip out the async flush code.
+ *
+ * 2. Or make the sync flushing use the async clflush path
+ * using mandatory fences underneath. Currently the below
+ * async flush happens after we bind the object.
*/
if (unlikely(obj->cache_dirty & ~obj->cache_coherent)) {
if (i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, 0))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
index 7c3da4e3e737..da85169006d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
@@ -427,6 +427,33 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
* can freely bypass the CPU cache when touching the pages with the GPU,
* where the kernel is completely unaware. On such platform we need
* apply the sledgehammer-on-acquire regardless of the @cache_coherent.
+ *
+ * Special care is taken on non-LLC platforms, to prevent potential
+ * information leak. The driver currently ensures:
+ *
+ * 1. All userspace objects, by default, have @cache_level set as
+ * I915_CACHE_NONE. The only exception is userptr objects, where we
+ * instead force I915_CACHE_LLC, but we also don't allow userspace to
+ * ever change the @cache_level for such objects. Another special case
+ * is dma-buf, which doesn't rely on @cache_dirty, but there we
+ * always do a forced flush when acquiring the pages, if there is a
+ * chance that the pages can be read directly from main memory with
+ * the GPU.
+ *
+ * 2. All I915_CACHE_NONE objects have @cache_dirty initially true.
+ *
+ * 3. All swapped-out objects(i.e shmem) have @cache_dirty set to
+ * true.
+ *
+ * 4. The @cache_dirty is never freely reset before the initial
+ * flush, even if userspace adjusts the @cache_level through the
+ * i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl.
+ *
+ * 5. All @cache_dirty objects(including swapped-in) are initially
+ * flushed with a synchronous call to drm_clflush_sg in
+ * __i915_gem_object_set_pages. The @cache_dirty can be freely reset
+ * at this point. All further asynchronous clfushes are never security
+ * critical, i.e userspace is free to race against itself.
*/
unsigned int cache_dirty:1;
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 17:45 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: mark dmabuf objects as ALLOC_USER Matthew Auld
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: mark userptr " Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 14:36 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: extract bypass-llc check into helper Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 14:38 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dmabuf: add paranoid flush-on-acquire Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 14:42 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-26 13:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/userptr: " Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 14:52 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/shmem: ensure flush during swap-in on non-LLC Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 14:53 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 17:45 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2021-10-20 14:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: expand on the kernel-doc for cache_dirty Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: mark up internal objects with start_cpu_write Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 15:11 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/selftests: mark up hugepages object " Matthew Auld
2021-10-20 15:12 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-10-18 19:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: mark dmabuf objects as ALLOC_USER Patchwork
2021-10-18 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-18 19:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-19 2:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-10-20 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] " Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211018174508.2137279-7-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox