Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Fix bigjoiner state copy fails
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 14:13:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203221340.GB17816@labuser-Z97X-UD5H> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220203183823.22890-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:38:15PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> We seem to be missing a few things from the bigjoiner state copy.
> Namely hw.mode isn't getting copied (which probably causes PIPESRC
> to be misconfigured), CTM/LUTs aren't getting copied (which could
> cause the pipe to produced incorrect output), and we also forgot
> to copy over the color_mgmt_changed flag so potentially we fail
> to do the actual CTM/LUT programming (assuming we aren't doing
> a full modeset or fastset). Fix it all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 85dce8a093d4..2006eec6e166 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5827,8 +5827,10 @@ intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state_nomodeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	master_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, master_crtc);
>  
>  	/* No need to copy state if the master state is unchanged */
> -	if (master_crtc_state)
> +	if (master_crtc_state) {
> +		crtc_state->uapi.color_mgmt_changed = master_crtc_state->uapi.color_mgmt_changed;

Since in this function we are copying from uapi_to_hw_state, is this the right function to copy to uapi state ?


>  		intel_crtc_copy_color_blobs(crtc_state, master_crtc_state);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -5890,13 +5892,23 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	memset(&crtc_state->hw, 0, sizeof(saved_state->hw));
>  	crtc_state->hw.enable = from_crtc_state->hw.enable;
>  	crtc_state->hw.active = from_crtc_state->hw.active;
> +	crtc_state->hw.mode = from_crtc_state->hw.mode;
>  	crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode = from_crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
>  	crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode = from_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +	crtc_state->hw.scaling_filter = from_crtc_state->hw.scaling_filter;
> +
> +	drm_property_replace_blob(&crtc_state->hw.degamma_lut,
> +				  from_crtc_state->hw.degamma_lut);
> +	drm_property_replace_blob(&crtc_state->hw.gamma_lut,
> +				  from_crtc_state->hw.gamma_lut);
> +	drm_property_replace_blob(&crtc_state->uapi.ctm,
> +				  from_crtc_state->hw.ctm);
>  
>  	/* Some fixups */
>  	crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed;
>  	crtc_state->uapi.connectors_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.connectors_changed;
>  	crtc_state->uapi.active_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.active_changed;
> +	crtc_state->uapi.color_mgmt_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.color_mgmt_changed;
>  	crtc_state->nv12_planes = crtc_state->c8_planes = crtc_state->update_planes = 0;
>  	crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = to_intel_crtc(from_crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = true;

This looks good

Manasi

> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-03 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-03 18:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Flag crtc scaling_filter changes as modeset Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 21:58   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-04  6:53     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Fix bigjoiner state copy fails Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 22:13   ` Navare, Manasi [this message]
2022-02-04  7:05     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-04  7:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 20:58     ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Remove weird code from intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 22:20   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Clean up the bigjoiner state copy logic Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04  7:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 20:52     ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-07  7:32       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Nuke some dead code Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 21:08   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Introduce intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_{slave, master}() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 21:27   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-07  7:31     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 10:53       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Convert for_each_intel_crtc_mask() to take a pipe mask instead Ville Syrjala
2022-02-09 19:57   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Use for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask() more Ville Syrjala
2022-02-09 19:58   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Return both master and slave pipes from enabled_bigjoiner_pipes() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-09 20:00   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-09 20:10     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Change bigjoiner state tracking to use the pipe bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 23:58   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-07  7:31     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-07 23:56       ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking Patchwork
2022-02-03 18:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-03 19:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-03 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-04  7:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking (rev3) Patchwork
2022-02-04  7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-04  8:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-04  9:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-15 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220203221340.GB17816@labuser-Z97X-UD5H \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox