From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Return both master and slave pipes from enabled_bigjoiner_pipes()
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:10:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgQfwpQxueke3AX2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209200026.GC31646@labuser-Z97X-UD5H>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:00:26PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:38:22PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Return both the master and slave pipe bitmasks from
> > enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(). We'll have use for both during
> > readout soon.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> This looks good, can this be just combined with the patch that would use the slave and mastr pipes
> in the readout ?
I think that patch is already far too big. But I couldn't immediately
think how to split it up even more.
>
> Either way,
>
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>
> Manasi
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 25 +++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index 6df498fc720a..34b6b4ab3a1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -4064,11 +4064,14 @@ static bool transcoder_ddi_func_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > return tmp & TRANS_DDI_FUNC_ENABLE;
> > }
> >
> > -static u8 enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +static void enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + u8 *master_pipes, u8 *slave_pipes)
> > {
> > - u8 master_pipes = 0, slave_pipes = 0;
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >
> > + *master_pipes = 0;
> > + *slave_pipes = 0;
> > +
> > for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, crtc,
> > bigjoiner_pipes(dev_priv)) {
> > enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> > @@ -4083,9 +4086,9 @@ static u8 enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > continue;
> >
> > if (tmp & MASTER_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE)
> > - master_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > + *master_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > else
> > - slave_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > + *slave_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > }
> >
> > if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 13)
> > @@ -4096,18 +4099,16 @@ static u8 enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > u32 tmp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe));
> >
> > if (tmp & UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_MASTER)
> > - master_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > + *master_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > if (tmp & UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SLAVE)
> > - slave_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > + *slave_pipes |= BIT(pipe);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /* Bigjoiner pipes should always be consecutive master and slave */
> > - drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, slave_pipes != master_pipes << 1,
> > + drm_WARN(&dev_priv->drm, *slave_pipes != *master_pipes << 1,
> > "Bigjoiner misconfigured (master pipes 0x%x, slave pipes 0x%x)\n",
> > - master_pipes, slave_pipes);
> > -
> > - return slave_pipes;
> > + *master_pipes, *slave_pipes);
> > }
> >
> > static u8 hsw_panel_transcoders(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > @@ -4126,6 +4127,7 @@ static u8 hsw_enabled_transcoders(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > u8 panel_transcoder_mask = hsw_panel_transcoders(dev_priv);
> > enum transcoder cpu_transcoder;
> > + u8 master_pipes, slave_pipes;
> > u8 enabled_transcoders = 0;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -4177,7 +4179,8 @@ static u8 hsw_enabled_transcoders(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
> >
> > /* bigjoiner slave -> consider the master pipe's transcoder as well */
> > - if (enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(dev_priv) & BIT(crtc->pipe)) {
> > + enabled_bigjoiner_pipes(dev_priv, &master_pipes, &slave_pipes);
> > + if (slave_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) {
> > cpu_transcoder = (enum transcoder) crtc->pipe - 1;
> > if (transcoder_ddi_func_is_enabled(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder))
> > enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 18:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Flag crtc scaling_filter changes as modeset Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 21:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-04 6:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Fix bigjoiner state copy fails Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 22:13 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-04 7:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-04 7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 20:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Remove weird code from intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-03 22:20 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Clean up the bigjoiner state copy logic Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 20:52 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-07 7:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Nuke some dead code Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 21:08 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Introduce intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_{slave, master}() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 21:27 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-07 7:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 10:53 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Convert for_each_intel_crtc_mask() to take a pipe mask instead Ville Syrjala
2022-02-09 19:57 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Use for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask() more Ville Syrjala
2022-02-09 19:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Return both master and slave pipes from enabled_bigjoiner_pipes() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-09 20:00 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-09 20:10 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-02-03 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Change bigjoiner state tracking to use the pipe bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-04 23:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-07 7:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-07 23:56 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-03 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking Patchwork
2022-02-03 18:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-03 19:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-03 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-04 7:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking (rev3) Patchwork
2022-02-04 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-04 8:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-04 9:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-15 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Use a bitmask for bigjoiner state tracking (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgQfwpQxueke3AX2@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox