Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"open list:INTEL GVT-g DRIVERS Intel GPU Virtualization"
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...,
	 Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	\"H. Peter Anvin\" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2022 17:28:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220207152847.836777-24-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207152847.836777-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

This was tested with kvm-unit-test that was developed
for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c    |  8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h    |  1 +
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 9f7bc7db08dd3..4a228a76b27d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -536,8 +536,19 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12
 		vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_DR);
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))
+	if (unlikely(svm->lbrv_enabled && (svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))) {
+
+		/* Copy LBR related registers from vmcb12,
+		 * but make sure that we only pick LBR enable bit from the guest.
+		 */
+
+		svm_copy_lbrs(vmcb12, svm->vmcb);
+		svm->vmcb->save.dbgctl &= LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+		svm_update_lbrv(&svm->vcpu);
+
+	} else if (unlikely(svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
 		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->vmcb01.ptr, svm->vmcb);
+	}
 }
 
 static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
@@ -592,6 +603,9 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext            = svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.virt_ext &
 						 LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
+	if (svm->lbrv_enabled)
+		svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext  |=
+			(svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK);
 
 	nested_svm_transition_tlb_flush(vcpu);
 
@@ -858,7 +872,10 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->vmcb01);
 
-	if (unlikely(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
+	if (unlikely(svm->lbrv_enabled && (svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))) {
+		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr, vmcb12);
+		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
+	} else if (unlikely(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK)) {
 		svm_copy_lbrs(svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr, svm->vmcb);
 		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 294e016f575a8..76aa6054d9db2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -890,6 +890,10 @@ void svm_update_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	bool current_enable_lbrv = !!(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext &
 				      LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK);
 
+	if (unlikely(is_guest_mode(vcpu) && svm->lbrv_enabled))
+		if (unlikely(svm->nested.ctl.virt_ext & LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK))
+			enable_lbrv = true;
+
 	if (enable_lbrv == current_enable_lbrv)
 		return;
 
@@ -3987,6 +3991,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			     guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_NRIPS);
 
 	svm->tsc_scaling_enabled = tsc_scaling && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_TSCRATEMSR);
+	svm->lbrv_enabled = lbrv && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV);
 
 	svm_recalc_instruction_intercepts(vcpu, svm);
 
@@ -4791,6 +4796,9 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
 		if (tsc_scaling)
 			kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_TSCRATEMSR);
 
+		if (lbrv)
+			kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_LBRV);
+
 		/* Nested VM can receive #VMEXIT instead of triggering #GP */
 		kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index b83e06d5d942a..0012ba5affcba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
 	/* cached guest cpuid flags for faster access */
 	bool nrips_enabled                : 1;
 	bool tsc_scaling_enabled          : 1;
+	bool lbrv_enabled                 : 1;
 
 	u32 ldr_reg;
 	u32 dfr_reg;
-- 
2.26.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-07 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 15:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/30] My patch queue Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/30] KVM: x86: SVM: don't passthrough SMAP/SMEP/PKE bits in !NPT && !gCR0.PG case Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: fix potential NULL derefernce on nested migration Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: mark vmcb01 as dirty when restoring SMM saved state Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/30] KVM: x86: nSVM/nVMX: set nested_run_pending on VM entry which is a result of RSM Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: expose clean bit support to the guest Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/30] KVM: x86: mark syntethic SMM vmexit as SVM_EXIT_SW Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control them Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/30] KVM: x86: lapic: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/30] KVM: x86: SVM: move avic definitions from AMD's spec to svm.h Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/30] KVM: x86: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/30] KVM: x86: SVM: use vmcb01 in avic_init_vmcb Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/30] KVM: x86: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/30] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID when apic acceleration is enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/30] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change local apic id when using older x2apic api Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/30] KVM: x86: SVM: remove avic's broken code that updated APIC ID Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/30] KVM: x86: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/30] KVM: x86: mmu: trace kvm_mmu_set_spte after the new SPTE was set Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/30] KVM: x86: mmu: add strict mmu mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/30] KVM: x86: mmu: add gfn_in_memslot helper Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/30] KVM: x86: mmu: allow to enable write tracking externally Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/30] x86: KVMGT: use kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enable Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: correctly virtualize LBR msrs when L2 is running Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested VMLOAD/VMSAVE Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: support PAUSE filter threshold and count when cpu_pm=on Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/30] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested vGIF Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/30] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/30] KVM: SVM: implement force_intercept_exceptions_mask Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/30] KVM: VMX: " Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/30] KVM: x86: get rid of KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-07 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for My patch queue Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220207152847.836777-24-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox