From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Unconfuse pre-icl vs. icl+ intel_sagv_{pre, post}_plane_update()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 19:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214173928.GB25816@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214091811.13725-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> intel_sagv_{pre,post}_plane_update() can accidentally forget
> to bail out early on pre-icl and proceed down the icl+ codepath
> at the end of the function. Fortunately it'll bail out before
> it gets too far due to old_qgv_mask==new_qgv_mask==0 so no real
> bug here. But lets make the code less confusing anyway.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index d8eb553ffad3..068870b17c43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3806,8 +3806,9 @@ void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (!new_bw_state)
> return;
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 && !intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
> - intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
> + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
> + intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> return;
> }
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Agree, I think that was my original code as well. However to be honest, don't like
the whole idea of splitting the code flow and bailing our prematurely for gen < 11 here.
Would be nice to have some unified approach, so that we have common main logic for all platforms,
like
if (intel_bw_state_equals(new, old))
return
intel_bw_state_apply_restrictions(...) -> here we would add intel_enable/disable_sagv for gen <11 and
qgv point restrictions for gen >= 11
Stan
>
> @@ -3857,8 +3858,9 @@ void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (!new_bw_state)
> return;
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 && intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state)) {
> - intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
> + if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
> + intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 9:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: SAGV fixes Ville Syrjala
2022-02-14 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Correctly populate use_sagv_wm for all pipes Ville Syrjala
2022-02-14 10:16 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Fix bw atomic check when switching between SAGV vs. no SAGV Ville Syrjala
2022-02-14 10:05 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 10:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-14 17:03 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 20:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 8:59 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-15 10:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 11:02 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-15 11:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 16:33 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-15 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 16:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 19:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-14 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Widen the QGV point mask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-14 17:17 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Unconfuse pre-icl vs. icl+ intel_sagv_{pre, post}_plane_update() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-14 17:39 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2022-02-14 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Split pre-icl vs. icl+ SAGV hooks apart Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17 18:31 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Pimp icl+ sagv pre/post update Ville Syrjala
2022-02-14 10:00 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 10:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-14 17:48 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-14 18:04 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-15 21:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: SAGV fixes Patchwork
2022-02-16 1:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220214173928.GB25816@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox