public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
	Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RPS sysfs interfaces
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:47:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217144158.21555-7-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Hi Andi,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm/drm-next tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next airlied/drm-next v5.17-rc4 next-20220217]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andi-Shyti/Introduce-multitile-support/20220217-224547
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip
config: x86_64-randconfig-a011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220218/202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/f1802e7224006bf4801fe56193bf5eb223a3f4d0
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Andi-Shyti/Introduce-multitile-support/20220217-224547
        git checkout f1802e7224006bf4801fe56193bf5eb223a3f4d0
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function 'act_freq_mhz_show':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:250:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     250 |  s64 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
         |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function 'boost_freq_mhz_store':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:318:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     318 |  return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func +250 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c

   246	
   247	static ssize_t act_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   248					 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buff)
   249	{
 > 250		s64 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   251							    __act_freq_mhz_show);
   252	
   253		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) actual_freq);
   254	}
   255	
   256	static s64 __cur_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
   257	{
   258		return intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(&gt->rps);
   259	}
   260	
   261	static ssize_t cur_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   262					 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buff)
   263	{
   264		s64 cur_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   265							 __cur_freq_mhz_show);
   266	
   267		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) cur_freq);
   268	}
   269	
   270	static s64 __boost_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
   271	{
   272		return intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(&gt->rps);
   273	}
   274	
   275	static ssize_t boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
   276					   struct device_attribute *attr,
   277					   char *buff)
   278	{
   279		s64 boost_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(dev, attr,
   280							   __boost_freq_mhz_show);
   281	
   282		return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", (u32) boost_freq);
   283	}
   284	
   285	static int __boost_freq_mhz_store(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 val)
   286	{
   287		struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
   288		bool boost = false;
   289	
   290		/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
   291		val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
   292		if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
   293			return -EINVAL;
   294	
   295		mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
   296		if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
   297			rps->boost_freq = val;
   298			boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
   299		}
   300		mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
   301		if (boost)
   302			schedule_work(&rps->work);
   303	
   304		return 0;
   305	}
   306	
   307	static ssize_t boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *dev,
   308					    struct device_attribute *attr,
   309					    const char *buff, size_t count)
   310	{
   311		ssize_t ret;
   312		u32 val;
   313	
   314		ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &val);
   315		if (ret)
   316			return ret;
   317	
 > 318		return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
   319						 __boost_freq_mhz_store, val) ?: count;
   320	}
   321	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17 14:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce multitile support Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] drm/i915: Rename INTEL_REGION_LMEM with INTEL_REGION_LMEM_0 Andi Shyti
2022-02-28 19:53   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-01 15:19   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/7] drm/i915: Prepare for multiple GTs Andi Shyti
2022-03-01 15:15   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 19:20     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/7] drm/i915/gt: add gt_is_root() helper Andi Shyti
2022-02-28 20:02   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-01 15:25     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 19:23       ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/i915/gt: create per-tile sysfs interface Andi Shyti
2022-03-02 16:57   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-06 23:04     ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-07 20:25       ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 19:45         ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-13 21:30           ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-14 12:08           ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RC6 " Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:34   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-17 15:53     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18  9:12       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-18  9:21         ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-18 10:46       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-02-21 17:12         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-22  8:57           ` Andi Shyti
2022-11-07  0:08             ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-02-17 20:49   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-17 23:53   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-03 10:19   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 22:15     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Create per-tile RPS sysfs interfaces Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 19:47   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-03-03 10:55   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-03-13 23:09     ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 7/7] drm/i915/gt: Adding new sysfs frequency attributes Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 15:45   ` Andi Shyti
2022-02-17 17:06     ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-02-28 20:37   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-03-14  0:38     ` Andi Shyti
2022-03-14  1:32       ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2022-03-03 11:17   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-17 23:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce multitile support Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-17 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202202180224.l042viYj-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox