public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Make most pre-skl primary plane registers unlocked
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:19:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221111914.GB17861@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210062403.18690-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:24:02AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Drop the locks around most primary plane register writes.
> The lock isn't needed since each plane's register are neatly
> contained on their own cachelines.
> 
> The one exception we have to make is DSPADDR/DSPSURF which is
> (ab)used to also trigger FBC nukes on pre-snb (since the
> hardware doesn't seem to have any dedicated mechanism to
> trigger nukes). So we need to keep the lock around it to
> protect against the rmw performed by the fbc code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c | 24 +++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
> index a87b65cd41fd..af190bacdd97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
> @@ -418,9 +418,6 @@ static void i9xx_plane_update_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
>  	enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = plane->i9xx_plane;
> -	unsigned long irqflags;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPSTRIDE(i9xx_plane),
>  			  plane_state->view.color_plane[0].mapping_stride);
> @@ -441,8 +438,6 @@ static void i9xx_plane_update_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPSIZE(i9xx_plane),
>  				  DISP_HEIGHT(crtc_h - 1) | DISP_WIDTH(crtc_w - 1));
>  	}
> -
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  }
>  
>  static void i9xx_plane_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -465,8 +460,6 @@ static void i9xx_plane_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	else
>  		dspaddr_offset = linear_offset;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> -
>  	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) && i9xx_plane == PLANE_B) {
>  		int crtc_x = plane_state->uapi.dst.x1;
>  		int crtc_y = plane_state->uapi.dst.y1;
> @@ -496,13 +489,15 @@ static void i9xx_plane_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	 * the control register just before the surface register.
>  	 */
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPCNTR(i9xx_plane), dspcntr);
> +
> +	/* lock to protect against rmw in fbc nuke */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 4)
>  		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPSURF(i9xx_plane),
>  				  intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) + dspaddr_offset);
>  	else
>  		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPADDR(i9xx_plane),
>  				  intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) + dspaddr_offset);
> -
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  }
>  
> @@ -540,14 +535,14 @@ static void i9xx_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	 */
>  	dspcntr = i9xx_plane_ctl_crtc(crtc_state);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> -
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPCNTR(i9xx_plane), dspcntr);
> +
> +	/* lock to protect against rmw in fbc nuke */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 4)
>  		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPSURF(i9xx_plane), 0);
>  	else
>  		intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPADDR(i9xx_plane), 0);
> -
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  }
>  
> @@ -566,8 +561,10 @@ g4x_primary_async_flip(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	if (async_flip)
>  		dspcntr |= DISP_ASYNC_FLIP;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPCNTR(i9xx_plane), dspcntr);
> +
> +	/* lock to protect against rmw in fbc nuke */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPSURF(i9xx_plane),
>  			  intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) + dspaddr_offset);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> @@ -582,12 +579,9 @@ vlv_primary_async_flip(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
>  	u32 dspaddr_offset = plane_state->view.color_plane[0].offset;
>  	enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = plane->i9xx_plane;
> -	unsigned long irqflags;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPADDR_VLV(i9xx_plane),
>  			  intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) + dspaddr_offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-21 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10  6:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates Ville Syrjala
2022-02-10  6:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Optimize icl+ universal plane programming Ville Syrjala
2022-02-21 11:21   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10  6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Make skl+ universal plane registers unlocked Ville Syrjala
2022-02-24 14:38   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10  6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Make cursor " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11  9:26   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-24 14:37     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-24 17:00       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-10  6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Make most pre-skl primary " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-21 11:19   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2022-02-10  6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Make pre-skl sprite " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-21 11:18   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10  7:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates (rev3) Patchwork
2022-02-10  8:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-10 12:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates (rev4) Patchwork
2022-02-10 14:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates (rev5) Patchwork
2022-02-11 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220221111914.GB17861@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox