From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/i915: Make cursor plane registers unlocked
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:37:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220224143703.GA19081@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211092604.393-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Drop the locks around cursor plane register writes. The
> lock isn't needed since each plane's register are neatly
> contained on their own cachelines.
>
> The locking did have a secondary effect of disabling
> interrupts around the cursor registers writes though.
> If we drop that then we open outselves up for sceduling
> delays and whatnot while on the middle of the register
> writes. That increases the chance of not all the register
> writes land during the same frame. For normal atomic
> commits this is not a concern as the vblank evade mechanism
> anyway disables interrupts around the update, but the legacy
> cursor codepath does not. Technically we should do a vblank
> evade there as well, but so far no one has bothered to hook
> that up. So in the meantime let's put an explicit local irq
> disable/enable around the legacy cursor update to keep the
> race window minimal.
>
> v2: local_irq_{disable,enable}() for legacy cursor ioctl
Guess, this will help our infamous atomic update evasion time exceeeded.
I think I've even checked with similar patch.
Good that its finally will make its way into kernel.
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> index 2ade8fdd9bdd..b648be744cf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> @@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ static void i845_cursor_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> u32 cntl = 0, base = 0, pos = 0, size = 0;
> - unsigned long irqflags;
>
> if (plane_state && plane_state->uapi.visible) {
> unsigned int width = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.dst);
> @@ -270,8 +269,6 @@ static void i845_cursor_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> pos = intel_cursor_position(plane_state);
> }
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> -
> /* On these chipsets we can only modify the base/size/stride
> * whilst the cursor is disabled.
> */
> @@ -290,8 +287,6 @@ static void i845_cursor_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> } else {
> intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, CURPOS(PIPE_A), pos);
> }
> -
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> }
>
> static void i845_cursor_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -492,7 +487,6 @@ static void i9xx_cursor_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe;
> u32 cntl = 0, base = 0, pos = 0, fbc_ctl = 0;
> - unsigned long irqflags;
>
> if (plane_state && plane_state->uapi.visible) {
> int width = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.dst);
> @@ -508,8 +502,6 @@ static void i9xx_cursor_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> pos = intel_cursor_position(plane_state);
> }
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> -
> /*
> * On some platforms writing CURCNTR first will also
> * cause CURPOS to be armed by the CURBASE write.
> @@ -555,8 +547,6 @@ static void i9xx_cursor_update_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, CURPOS(pipe), pos);
> intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, CURBASE(pipe), base);
> }
> -
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> }
>
> static void i9xx_cursor_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> @@ -715,6 +705,14 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *_plane,
> */
> crtc_state->active_planes = new_crtc_state->active_planes;
>
> + /*
> + * Technically we should do a vblank evasion here to make
> + * sure all the cursor registers update on the same frame.
> + * For now just make sure the register writes happen as
> + * quickly as possible to minimize the race window.
> + */
> + local_irq_disable();
> +
> if (new_plane_state->uapi.visible) {
> intel_plane_update_noarm(plane, crtc_state, new_plane_state);
> intel_plane_update_arm(plane, crtc_state, new_plane_state);
> @@ -722,6 +720,8 @@ intel_legacy_cursor_update(struct drm_plane *_plane,
> intel_plane_disable_arm(plane, crtc_state);
> }
>
> + local_irq_enable();
> +
> intel_plane_unpin_fb(old_plane_state);
>
> out_free:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-24 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 6:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates Ville Syrjala
2022-02-10 6:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Optimize icl+ universal plane programming Ville Syrjala
2022-02-21 11:21 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10 6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Make skl+ universal plane registers unlocked Ville Syrjala
2022-02-24 14:38 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10 6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Make cursor " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 9:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-24 14:37 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2022-02-24 17:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-10 6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Make most pre-skl primary " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-21 11:19 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10 6:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Make pre-skl sprite " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-21 11:18 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-10 7:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates (rev3) Patchwork
2022-02-10 8:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-10 12:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates (rev4) Patchwork
2022-02-10 14:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Futher optimize plane updates (rev5) Patchwork
2022-02-11 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220224143703.GA19081@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox