From: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/display: Fix HPD short pulse handling for eDP
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:51:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com> (raw)
Commit 13ea6db2cf24 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel
powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is
usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is
some error or status that source needs to handle.
When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux
transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power()
is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored.
So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux
lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit
being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended.
v2:
- renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd()
- fixed indentation
Fixes: 13ea6db2cf24 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off")
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 619546441eae5..e83947fe2411a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -4867,7 +4867,7 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool long_hpd)
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
if (dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP &&
- (long_hpd || !intel_pps_have_power(intel_dp))) {
+ (long_hpd || !intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd(intel_dp))) {
/*
* vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which
* would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
index 9c986e8932f87..64bd4ca0edd47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
@@ -1075,14 +1075,14 @@ static void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(intel_dp);
}
-bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+bool intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
bool have_power = false;
with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) {
- have_power = edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp) &&
- edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp);
+ have_power = edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp) ||
+ edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp);
}
return have_power;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
index fbb47f6f453e4..e64144659d31f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
-bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
+bool intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
void intel_pps_wait_power_cycle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
void intel_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 18:51 José Roberto de Souza [this message]
2022-03-11 18:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/display: Do not re-enable PSR after it was marked as not reliable José Roberto de Souza
2022-03-15 13:29 ` Hogander, Jouni
2022-03-11 21:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/display: Fix HPD short pulse handling for eDP Patchwork
2022-03-14 14:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/display: Fix HPD short pulse handling for eDP (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-14 17:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox