Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/bios: Validate the panel_name table
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:19:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317171948.10400-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317171948.10400-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

In addition to the fp_timing,dvo_timing,panel_pnp_id tables
there also exists a panel_name table. Unlike the others this
is just one offset+table_size even though there are still 16
actual panel_names in the data block.

The panel_name table made its first appearance somewhere
around VBT version 156-163. The exact version is not known.
But we don't need to know that since we can just check whether
the pointers block has enough room for it or not.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index a2a3fb459a9d..59f16c460d7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static u32 block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
 static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
 				   const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs)
 {
-	int fp_timing_size, dvo_timing_size, panel_pnp_id_size;
+	int fp_timing_size, dvo_timing_size, panel_pnp_id_size, panel_name_size;
 	int data_block_size, lfp_data_size;
 	int i;
 
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
 	fp_timing_size = ptrs->ptr[0].fp_timing.table_size;
 	dvo_timing_size = ptrs->ptr[0].dvo_timing.table_size;
 	panel_pnp_id_size = ptrs->ptr[0].panel_pnp_id.table_size;
+	panel_name_size = ptrs->panel_name.table_size;
 
 	/* fp_timing has variable size */
 	if (fp_timing_size < 32 ||
@@ -190,6 +191,11 @@ static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
 	    panel_pnp_id_size != sizeof(struct lvds_pnp_id))
 		return false;
 
+	/* panel_name is not present in old VBTs */
+	if (panel_name_size != 0 &&
+	    panel_name_size != sizeof(struct lvds_lfp_panel_name))
+		return false;
+
 	lfp_data_size = ptrs->ptr[1].fp_timing.offset - ptrs->ptr[0].fp_timing.offset;
 	if (16 * lfp_data_size > data_block_size)
 		return false;
@@ -230,6 +236,9 @@ static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
 			return false;
 	}
 
+	if (ptrs->panel_name.offset + 16 * panel_name_size > data_block_size)
+		return false;
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -253,6 +262,13 @@ static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block)
 		ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset -= offset;
 	}
 
+	if (ptrs->panel_name.table_size) {
+		if (ptrs->panel_name.offset < offset)
+			return false;
+
+		ptrs->panel_name.offset -= offset;
+	}
+
 	return validate_lfp_data_ptrs(bdb, ptrs);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
index d727fcd6cdab..e4a11c3e3f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h
@@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr {
 struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs {
 	u8 lvds_entries; /* followed by one or more lvds_data_ptr structs */
 	struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr ptr[16];
+	struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table panel_name; /* 156-163? */
 } __packed;
 
 /*
@@ -778,6 +779,10 @@ struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data {
 	struct lvds_lfp_data_entry data[16];
 } __packed;
 
+struct lvds_lfp_panel_name {
+	u8 name[13];
+} __packed;
+
 /*
  * Block 43 - LFP Backlight Control Data Block
  */
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-17 17:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/bios: Extract struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 18:33   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/bios: Make copies of VBT data blocks Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 19:02   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 22:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-18  9:44       ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 20:21   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 19:10   ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 20:04     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-17 20:08       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-17 20:21   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/bios: Validate LFP data table pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/bios: Trust the LFP data pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/bios: Reorder panel DTD parsing Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 23:41   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/bios: Get access to the tail end of the LFP data block Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/bios: Parse the seamless DRRS min refresh rate Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Respect VBT " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling Patchwork
2022-03-17 17:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-17 20:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 22:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-17 22:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 22:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-18  0:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling (rev4) Patchwork
2022-03-18  0:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-18  0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-18  2:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220317171948.10400-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox