From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:21:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317202153.5719-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317171948.10400-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Currently get_lvds_fp_timing() still returns a pointer to the original
data block rather than our copy. Let's convert the data pointer offsets
to be relative to the data block rather than the whole BDB. With that
we can make get_lvds_fp_timing() return a pointer to the copy.
v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index ffeaf7f6405f..777339f5dd79 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -153,6 +153,29 @@ static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
return block - bdb;
}
+/* make the data table offsets relative to the data block */
+static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void *ptrs_block)
+{
+ struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs = ptrs_block;
+ u32 offset;
+ int i;
+
+ offset = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+ if (ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset < offset ||
+ ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset < offset ||
+ ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset < offset)
+ return false;
+
+ ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset -= offset;
+ ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset -= offset;
+ ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset -= offset;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static const void *
find_section(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id,
@@ -189,6 +212,13 @@ find_section(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Found BDB block %d (size %zu, min size %zu)\n",
section_id, block_size, min_size);
+ if (section_id == BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS &&
+ !fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(bdb, entry->data + 3)) {
+ drm_err(&i915->drm, "VBT has malformed LFP data table pointers\n");
+ kfree(entry);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
list_add(&entry->node, &i915->vbt.bdb_blocks);
return entry->data + 3;
@@ -270,22 +300,19 @@ get_lvds_dvo_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *lvds_lfp_data,
* this function may return NULL if the corresponding entry is invalid
*/
static const struct lvds_fp_timing *
-get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_header *bdb,
- const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
+get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs,
int index)
{
- size_t data_ofs = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
u16 data_size = ((const u16 *)data)[-1]; /* stored in header */
size_t ofs;
if (index >= ARRAY_SIZE(ptrs->ptr))
return NULL;
ofs = ptrs->ptr[index].fp_timing.offset;
- if (ofs < data_ofs ||
- ofs + sizeof(struct lvds_fp_timing) > data_ofs + data_size)
+ if (ofs + sizeof(struct lvds_fp_timing) > data_size)
return NULL;
- return (const struct lvds_fp_timing *)((const u8 *)bdb + ofs);
+ return (const struct lvds_fp_timing *)((const u8 *)data + ofs);
}
/* Parse general panel options */
@@ -388,7 +415,7 @@ parse_lfp_panel_dtd(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
"Found panel mode in BIOS VBT legacy lfp table:\n");
drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(panel_fixed_mode);
- fp_timing = get_lvds_fp_timing(bdb, lvds_lfp_data,
+ fp_timing = get_lvds_fp_timing(lvds_lfp_data,
lvds_lfp_data_ptrs,
panel_type);
if (fp_timing) {
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 17:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/bios: Extract struct lvds_lfp_data_ptr_table Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 18:33 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/bios: Make copies of VBT data blocks Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 19:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 22:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-18 9:44 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/bios: Use the copy of the LFP data table always Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 19:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-17 20:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-17 20:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-17 20:21 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/bios: Validate LFP data table pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/bios: Trust the LFP data pointers Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/bios: Validate the panel_name table Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/bios: Reorder panel DTD parsing Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/bios: Generate LFP data table pointers if the VBT lacks them Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 23:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/bios: Get access to the tail end of the LFP data block Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/bios: Parse the seamless DRRS min refresh rate Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Respect VBT " Ville Syrjala
2022-03-17 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling Patchwork
2022-03-17 17:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-17 20:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 22:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-17 22:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 22:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-18 0:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Rework BDB block handling (rev4) Patchwork
2022-03-18 0:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-18 0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-18 2:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220317202153.5719-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox