From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:45:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220407164532.1242578-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220407164532.1242578-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of
the module:
i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page,
which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks
like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the
remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 2998d895a6b3..1c88d4121658 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -772,9 +772,14 @@ int i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
int i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
bool intr)
{
+ long ret;
+
assert_object_held(obj);
- return dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
- intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+
+ ret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
+ intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 16:45 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fix broken build Matthew Auld
2022-04-07 16:45 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-04-08 1:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence Lucas De Marchi
2022-04-08 5:00 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-04-08 8:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-04-08 9:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-04-08 9:12 ` Christian König
2022-04-08 9:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-04-08 9:29 ` Christian König
2022-04-07 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fix broken build Christian König
2022-04-07 17:07 ` Matthew Auld
2022-04-08 8:32 ` Matthew Auld
2022-04-08 8:45 ` Christian König
2022-04-07 22:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2022-04-08 0:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220407164532.1242578-2-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox